FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24-06-2021, 10:16 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Royal Academy apologises to artist Jess de Wahls in transphobia row The Royal Academy of Arts has apologised to artist Jess de Wahls after removing her work from its gift shop following complaints that she had expressed transphobic views. Her embroidery was removed after a backlash over comments she made in 2019 saying "humans can not change sex". De Wahls, who denies transphobia, said she "appreciates" the apology. "We had no right to judge her views," the prestigious London institution said in a statement on Wednesday. "We have thought long and hard since then about this and the wider issues it raises. "One thing is clear to us now - we should have handled this better. We have apologised to Jess de Wahls for the way we have treated her and do so again publicly now. We had no right to judge her views on our social media. This betrayed our most important core value - the protection of free speech." De Wahls said the apology was "common sense and I am glad we are getting back to that", adding: "I hope this makes other institutions wake up and take note." The German-born textiles artist wrote in a blog in 2019 that "a woman is an adult human female. (Not an identity or feeling.)" She told BBC Radio 4 on Monday she had received lots of support in the light of the Royal Academy's original decision to remove her work. "The feedback I'm getting from the general public is quite the opposite [from the Royal Academy's stance]. This isn't going to go away. This is a conversation that needs to happen in public." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-57578732 |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 10:35 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Transphobia,
gets Toxic in Debates |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 10:37 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:26 AM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Notice how it’s always always always white women? Transphobia is white supremacy. I hope desperately appealing to white patriarchy by throwing trans women under the bus works out for these middle age white women
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:32 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
i can't even imagine how you came up with this point of view, it has nothing to do with the subject at all
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:32 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
If anything your post here is racist, misogynistic and ageist
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:35 AM | #7 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
I would ask though that if you actually realise that you can't rationalise any of it into an actual debate, and you're operating from a place of pure feeling/moral absolutism, you give that some thought on your own time. Your business of course it doesn't affect me either way if you do or not. |
||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:44 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
It's not a view, it's a literal fact that transwomen aren't biological women, and that you can't change sex |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:46 AM | #9 | ||
|
|||
-
|
I would however point out that there is ample circumstantial evidence that white patriarchy and systems of power actually benefit from several aspects of trans rights and can, has and will (disingenuously) latch onto several aspects of the debate, on the side of transwomen, to pursue misogynistic and patriarchal agendas. The "strength of feeling" I mentioned above has been used to very successfully blinker the community to the fact that it is being used, weaponised, further marginalised and will eventually be discarded in a worse position than it was before.
Happening in far more areas than just the trans rights debate, of course, but it's becoming clear as day that this is the current script. The LAST thing patriarchal structures of power want, is women and transpeople getting together to have nuanced, calm, mutually beneficial discussions... and right now the trans and gay communities - and I'm going to be quite frank here and say the YOUNGER elements of the communities who have neither the education nor experience to understand what's actually happening sociologically - is being played like an angry fiddle. It's a ****ing tragedy and not least for the older generation (of both women and LGBTQ+) that's losing a lot what was fought for over decades. You wonder why a lot of "middle aged" women are involved? Because they better remember a time when much of the progress for women that has happened over the last 20 years was not a thing and thus they FAR BETTER understand that it could easily slip through their fingers, and are rightly far more concerned about that than people whose living memories don't go back further than the year 2000. |
||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:46 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
so in your view only black women should have a voice?
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Last edited by Cherie; 24-06-2021 at 11:48 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 11:53 AM | #11 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Keira Bell also, who's neither white nor middle aged has one of the loudest voices of all, famously winning her case against the Tavistock
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...s-for-children
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by Niamh.; 24-06-2021 at 11:54 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 12:34 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 12:43 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Alison Bailey (also a BLM supporter btw........)
https://filia.org.uk/latest-news/202...ng-free-speech
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 12:45 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 02:17 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Bringing race into something that has nothing to do with race just makes your weak argument even weaker.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-06-2021, 06:24 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think that's what it was, anyway. Which I guess also means that stopping people from performing ritualistic sacrifice is also white supremacy? Either way, most transphobia is actually routed in homophobia, because some people don't like to see males not conform to sex roles. And in some cases, it's not even transphobia. Posie Parker doesn't do what she does because she hates transwomen, she does it to protect female spaces. Oh wait, I mean she's a white supremacist Last edited by Oliver_W; 24-06-2021 at 07:08 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|