FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
View Poll Results: Freud or Jung: who’s yo. O.G. (preferred psychologist)? | ||||||
Jung |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 66.67% | |||
|
||||||
Freud |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
Both |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
Neither |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 33.33% | |||
|
||||||
It’s not that black-and-white to me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Who’s your preferred psychologist of the two (for those with a bit of an interest in psychology)?
I personally very-much dislike Freud’s teachings, but that’s just me. For me, his kind of psychoanalysis was what made psychiatry between the ’50s and ’70s (including the undermining of the severity of bipolar disorder and deep clinician depression and over-attribution of bipolar/depressive psychosis to schizophrenia) but I can accept that some of his contributions (especially about anxiety) have the right to stick and are actually pretty well-crafted as far as conceptualisation goes. So I can’t begrudge him of everything. I just think he was a bit pervy and not in the full know about the severity of “mood disorders”.
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
One thing I will say about Freud, in his favour, is his underpinning of the unconscious/subconscious mind, in terms of shadow-parts to our personalities and so-on. He had a point there, and I even mentioned the possibility he (and other frameworks) lay/s out there in the poll-options of my thread about pure good vs. pure evil (and everything in-between), even if I didn’t have Freud in-mind when I crafted that option.
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
I've never studied either in depth. Did a bit of Freud in AS-level psychology before I dropped it - the ego, superego and the id and all that. Seemed relatively plausible. Jung I've never read but Jordan Peterson draws on him a lot and I like most of Peterson's work even though that's not a very popular thing to say these days
Last edited by MTVN; Yesterday at 06:26 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Apart from the odd time where I get a bit "rabbit-holey" I'm not particularly interested in psychology...
... but I love history and mythology, so Jung's work on Archetypes and how it ties into the various pantheons and recurring stories is interesting to me.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
OG(den)
|
Q: What's a Freudian slip?
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
I think they are both useful historically in the context of you have to start somewhere if you are going to attempt to understand/explain something because it encourages thought and discussion.
Personally, with billions of people on the planet and an almost infinite number of defining influences on peoples lives, i just don't think there are simple answers. I think it's an area where AI can be put to good use though, so watch this space is what i would say |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. Last edited by Redway; Yesterday at 04:38 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|