[Kate!]

I'm bloody sick to death of all this constant crap, day after day!!

Labour are fcuking useless, worse than that they totally do not give a flying feck. Starmer is inherently evil, moronically robotic and a dangerous nasty man.


I'm sat here watching a woman crying, begging Starmer to do something about all this migrant crime, she's absolutely traumatised and living in fear.

This is the tip.of the iceberg.

You've got David Lammy publicly laughing out loud and blaming the Tories after the total debacle with the prisoner they released. Yes he did. Its only thanks to the public that he got caught again despite he himself trying to get returned to jail. They are utterly inept in every way. I'm convinced Lammy is actually retarded God forgive me.

Migrants!! The Government have so much blood on their hands. I'll wait here while people call me racist. I do not care. They are evil, they do not.have our ways, they are allowed to come here willy nilly, with enticements to do so. It's a joke. People are angry.

Now let's talk about our pathetic excuse for a King. Charles.could intervene, he has the authority and wherewithal to do so. A general election should be called.immediately!! We need to get shut seriously. But he doesn't give a fig either. Bumbling old adulterer, he's really not on this planet. We need him gone too, William needs to take over.

I'm typing all this as my thoughts are racing, so it might not be presented in logical order.

Now we have Rachel Reeves who's done what Angela Rayner did and is now crying, bleating about it that it was a genuine mistake. Yadda yadda yadda. Of course Starmer is backing her. Get her gone. Grasping cow.

Going back to the enticements for illegal migrants to come which grows daily, do not tell me again that they don't get these things because they DO. Hotels phones laptops gym memberships, bikes or scooters, priority medical and dental treatment and more....

This country is in a TERRIBLE state and it's getting worse. For crying out loud.

There are 10 thousand foreign law breakers, including murderers and rapists in our jails. And Labour are patting themselves on the back for now actually deporting one. One!! Again it was only.because of the public that he was FINALLY dealt with. Useless doesn't begin to describe it.

No wonder feelings run high.

Now let's talk about poppies and our flags. They are apparently triggering. Boo bloody hoo. They are an inherent part of being British and proud. Utterly ridiculous. Stop pandering because you want votes.

I used to be a staunch Labour supporter once upon a time. Never again
I'm done. It's past time for these sycophantic wasters to be shown the door.

The country is crying out for change.

Every day I think it can't get worse and every day I'm wrong.

Sigh.

[joeysteele]

Needless to say.
I don't agree with just all that.

It just sounds more prejuducial divisive tripe.

I'll add, particularly now even as to myself and I'm a strong person.
If I see a group of people now, even if just walking my Stafffie, however if I see a group of people immaterial of ages..
With particularly the St George's flags.
I'll go another way round on that walk to avoid them
I am more seeing that flag as a more sinister emblem now.

I detest all prejudice against other human beings and detest people who hold prejudice.
Looking only for division.
Irrational outbursts lumping all immigrants as bad or undesirables is despicable in my view.
It's actually frightening and worrying that people may think like the tone and content of what's been created in this thread.
Extremely worrying that should be.

It sounds like something from Germany before the war as to just scapegoating of other human beings.

[Oliver_W]

There is a precedent for a Monarch dismissing a Prime Minister - William IV kicked Lord Melbourne out as PM, and appointed a minority government.

The new government quickly fell apart, and Melbourne was reinstated and was PM for a further 6 years.

As a result, the Monarch (technically) lost the ability to choose members of their Cabinet - or rather, they'd "choose" them upon the "advice" of the leader of the largest party in the Commons, who would be the now-implicit "choice" for PM.

My point is, Charles technically can dismiss the current Parliament, but unless there's a literal bulging majority in his side, both in Government and the wider population, it could cause further changes.

[joeysteele]

The Monarch cannot really dismiss a serving PM elected in a democratically held election.
People moan at immigrants yet don't even seem to know our own constitution as to the Monarchy.

The Monarch isn't even allowed to enter the Commons.

If any Monarch tried to interfere with the parliamentary and electoral process it would lead to a massive constitutional crisis.
The Monarch rules only more ceremonially now.
Keeping detached more from the political process.

A Monarch is decided too not on popularity but birthright.
Whoever is Monarch can stay there no matter how good or poor they are until they die.
Yet some people seem to not even understand our Royal set up.

I do think however, IF a Prime Minister or government actually loses a vote of confidence in parliament.
However then refused to resign.
Then the Monarch in that near impossible and extreme scenario could dictate resignation and an election.

Governments no matter how good or bad, are ELECTED in one day after campaigning for up to 5 years
As long as they can command an overall majority in parliament.
That's our democratic system.
Then only the serving PM can call an election at the time of his or her choosing.
We choose on election day.
That choice then stands for up to 5 years as long as the government has an overall majority in the Commons.
That's UK democracy and OUR electoral system.

It's crazy some people don't seem to know those basic UK facts.

[MTVN]

Time for a cuppa I think Kate

[Kate!]

Yes well pretty much what I was expecting. Condescension, a bit of contempt, blindness and patronising.