[StrawberryCake]

Dear Miss May,

Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding BIG BROTHER.

You can be assured all housemates found to be in breach of the Big Brother
rules will be dealt with accordingly. Please be assured your concerns have
been logged and forwarded for the attention of the production team
responsible for the this programme.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us. We appreciate all
feedback from our viewers; complimentary or otherwise.

Regards,

Lorna Dane
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries

For information about Channel 4 have a look at our FAQ section at
www.channel4.com/help




basicly nothing is gunna be done

[Beastie]

oh yeah i heard on the forums.. lisa, karly and dogface were talking about nominations.. or coughing.. or doing something to make up a code?

[vesavius]

I love their brush offs.. They are almost art.

[StrawberryCake]

Originally posted by vesavius
I love their brush offs.. They are almost art.

yea this is prolly an automated answer

[BBLB]

I hope you added that freddie did similar with his wolves and sheep code.
Even my favourite Siavash has talked noms and his punishment was to wear a dunces hat.
And yes that response from CH4 is automated.

[StrawberryCake]

Originally posted by BBLB
I hope you added that freddie did similar with his wolves and sheep code.
Even my favourite Siavash has talked noms and his punishment was to wear a dunces hat.

i know but siavash got delt with

[xmynxiex]

All they ever do is send out that same old clap trap.

[vesavius]

At the risk of sounding like Marcus, Lorna Dane is the real name of the X-Man Polaris, which entertained me for a nano second.

[BBLB]

Originally posted by StrawberryCake

i know but siavash got delt with

Yeah but you know how it goes,if Karly and Lisa had to wear a dunces hat then threads would be up everywhere screaming they should have had a much stronger punishment.

The problem is they dont issue the same punishment for the same rule break and that causes shouts of unfairness and favouritism.

Nominations talk should be punished in 3 stages
1st nom talk : hms involved are not allowed to nominate
2nd nom talk noms not allowed and they are up for eviction.
3rd nom talk : immediate eviction from the house.

When you consider what happened to nasty nick you see how the rules have softened.

[Patrick]

Originally posted by StrawberryCake

yea this is prolly an automated answer

OBVIOUSLY

[BigBummer]

Originally posted by BBLB
I hope you added that freddie did similar with his wolves and sheep code.
Even my favourite Siavash has talked noms and his punishment was to wear a dunces hat.
And yes that response from CH4 is automated.

#

Are you serious? Surely you can understand he was using a very well known psychological metaphor to explain a common human group behaviour trait?
Very intuitive, not.

[*mazedsalv**]

When I wrote about punishments, the rumour of the triple eviction and people going in, this was my reply, its more packed than I thought:

Dear Salv, Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding BIG BROTHER. Big Brother will punish those who they believe are breaking the rules. Anyupdates will on the highlights programmes, BIG BROTHER'S LITTLE BROTHER andthe website, the address is as follows: www.channel4.com/bb There are many rumours regarding evictions each week, this week there are noplans for a triple eviction. However, any updates will be on the website. Thank you again for taking the time to contact us. Regards, Penny WatsonChannel 4 Viewer Enquiries

[bettiepage]

Lol. You can tell they didn't read your email. You lame for sending off one in the first place; They ain't gonna listen.

[SoFarSoGood282]

Typical!! Given the brush off!!

[*mazedsalv**]

Originally posted by Rice_square
Lol. You can tell they didn't read your email. You lame for sending off one in the first place; They ain't gonna listen.

Why's it lame? its there for a reason, we know we will get generic replies but we still post questions.

[tentpeg]

1. Ch4 do listen, believe me.
2. Wolves and sheep - Freddie wasn't coding nominations at all with this.

[StrawberryCake]

Originally posted by Rice_square
Lol. You can tell they didn't read your email. You lame for sending off one in the first place; They ain't gonna listen.

might as well give it a go

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by *mazedsalv**

Why's it lame? its there for a reason, we know we will get generic replies but we still post questions.

Because you know nothing you send is gonna change their minds, DUH

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by StrawberryCake

might as well give it a go

Well it failed

[StrawberryCake]

Originally posted by Rice_square

Well it failed

still had a chance to succeed, more of a chance if i had not wrote to them

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by StrawberryCake

still had a chance to succeed, more of a chance if i had not wrote to them

Suppose. I just feel sorry for people who think they can make a difference with one email

[StrawberryCake]

Originally posted by Rice_square

Suppose. I just feel sorry for people who think they can make a difference with one email

doesnt have to be an email....could be more serious if people where like that (could do big bro for fixing with legal ways) :P but since as i;m not then its the best I could do

[StrawberryCake]

and i didnt think i couild make a difference

[BBLB]

Originally posted by BigBummer

#

Are you serious? Surely you can understand he was using a very well known psychological metaphor to explain a common human group behaviour trait?
Very intuitive, not.

Did you listen to his conversation with Marcus,we need to take on the wolves..it was very clearly nomination talk.
The metaphor was used to discuss without naming names who his targets were.
People continue to disregard halfwits rule breaking and see him as a victim.
He has been nominated every week but nobody mentions how many times halfwit has continually voted lisa.
Heck in another forum some were saying they dont care how many rules halfwit breaks its fair because of the amount of times he has been up.

You cant have 1 rule for 1 hm and another rule for the others.

Halfwit has been guilty of nomination talk and wrapping it up in some philisophical metaphor does not change the fact its still a rule break.

[Caramel77]

Originally posted by StrawberryCake

still had a chance to succeed, more of a chance if i had not wrote to them

Good for you.