About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Marches · 31-01-2018, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

the context.

Ann rolling her eyes at loud music is different from rolling her eyes listening to a conversation between two gay men uplifting each other about their sexuality especially with her history in the parliament.

Not if she does it all the time

montblanc · 31-01-2018, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marches

Not if she does it all the time

it'd be different if the conversation was a joke but it was pretty serious conversation. it doesn't take a genius to figure out that she was rolling her eyes at their conversation topic & it's not as if she rolls her eyes for fun either

chuff me dizzy · 31-01-2018, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

the context.

Ann rolling her eyes at loud music is different from rolling her eyes listening to a conversation between two gay men uplifting each other about their sexuality especially with her history in the parliament.

Exactly the same roll

montblanc · 31-01-2018, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Exactly the same roll

ok we'll just agree to disagree i guess

Paula D · 31-01-2018, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

it'd be different if the conversation was a joke but it was pretty serious conversation. it doesn't take a genius to figure out that she was rolling her eyes at their conversation topic & it's not as if she rolls her eyes for fun either

Jesus you're really not going to drop it are you?

Ann rolls her eyes at EVERYONE, therefore it is not a homophobic action. Fact.

Not going to change no matter how many times you say it.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

montblanc · 31-01-2018, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paula D

Jesus you're really not going to drop it are you?

Ann rolls her eyes at EVERYONE, therefore it is not a homophobic action. Fact.

Not going to change no matter how many times you say it.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

alright

Marsh. · 31-01-2018, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

alright

That racist spits on ALL non-white people so he's not discriminating ALRIGHT!!!

Alf · 31-01-2018, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

it'd be different if the conversation was a joke but it was pretty serious conversation. it doesn't take a genius to figure out that she was rolling her eyes at their conversation topic & it's not as if she rolls her eyes for fun either

Big Brother edits those eye rolls in.

Marsh. · 31-01-2018, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alf

Big Brother edits those eye rolls in.

I knew it!

I could see the pixellation on her face where the CGI fades in.

poppsywoppsy · 31-01-2018, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by montblanc

when someone has a background of voting against certain LGBT rights & then they roll their eyes, make faces, etc. at anything to do with the LGBT what makes you think the LGBT person wouldn't get offended? It's the context. And you can't use Jess or Ashley as examples because they aren't gay.

& it isn't about "having a sense of humor" because even though I strongly dislike Ann I can admit she has a lot of funny moments through out the series

Oh please, if it was a programme about Gay rights, LGBT or other serious issues you would be right.

But it is not, it is an entertainment show. So many just want to feel morally superior whilst not knowing the basics of why, how, what Ann's reasons were, just that they want to score antiquated points.

So what if you are right, slap on the back, well done, you have surely shown it to Ann, good for you, hurray, and millions more of plaudits for showing little old Ann just how magnanimous you are when bringing up her past, voting records, mariage status, sexual habits and the kitchen sink.

OK noted, understood, underlined, gold star, woohoo, does it change anything which hasn't already been changed? A big fat NO. Will Ann change her mind Another big fat NO, will it bother Ann, yet another big fat NO.

CBB is a television reality show, the theme is the Year of the Woman, not Gay Rights, LGBT agendas and one Drag act.

There were many housemates who haven't whined on and on for something which they have already received. Gays have got it, what's the problem?

No, Gays are seriously in jeopardy of looking like they cannot accept what they already have and will instigate a witch hunt after an elderly woman who broke no laws, served her constituents as a MP for years and voted for her religious beliefs.

I salute those posters who have said they are Gay but will not let Shane's rabble rousing on social media and LGBTs agendas stop them from leading a very full & happy life and would abhor what has been happening in their name.

One last point, those who attack Ann at every turn might be very surprised that life does not begin and end in what's in your pants. It is only a part of life and one which seems to consume those who presumably are sexually active anyway, what more do you want? Demand demand demand, is all I have read on here, you do as we say or you are this or that. No we are not, you can't make us it by name calling or labeling. Some of the childish posts on here are pitiful, just pitiful yet they think we will say, Yes of course you are right. What might happen is that Gays could face a backlash because of their demands.

They are not the biggest group in the population yet by anymeans, yet make the loudest noises. There is a thing called a silent majority which is happy to accommodate all people, races, orientations and opinions, but to push them too far by the sort of behaviour that has gone on recently could very well be to the detriment of everything achieved by those who worked so hard to achieve them over the years.

pontyboi · 31-01-2018, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Surely it would be today..should have been then too. Electroshock treatment should never ever have been a thing. Plus this was on a ****ing 12 year old. Whoever did that should have been jailed for child abuse tbh

It was assault.

The **** he told me as an 18 year old I was so shocked.

He went on to be Mr gay UK though so good for him.....the **** he described to me is like something you see on american horror story.

How can we support any of these issues? This isn't directed at you Vicky just at everyone I know if one of your children turned out gay you as a good person would not endorse them being made to have 1950s style electric shock treatment.

Ive loved how housemates have been able to talk freely this year it's made it a social experiment again but Ann to me is the female version of hitler.

chuff me dizzy · 31-01-2018, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Oh please, if it was a programme about Gay rights, LGBT or other serious issues you would be right.

But it is not, it is an entertainment show. So many just want to feel morally superior whilst not knowing the basics of why, how, what Ann's reasons were, just that they want to score antiquated points.

So what if you are right, slap on the back, well done, you have surely shown it to Ann, good for you, hurray, and millions more of plaudits for showing little old Ann just how magnanimous you are when bringing up her past, voting records, mariage status, sexual habits and the kitchen sink.

OK noted, understood, underlined, gold star, woohoo, does it change anything which hasn't already been changed? A big fat NO. Will Ann change her mind Another big fat NO, will it bother Ann, yet another big fat NO.

CBB is a television reality show, the theme is the Year of the Woman, not Gay Rights, LGBT agendas and one Drag act.

There were many housemates who haven't whined on and on for something which they have already received. Gays have got it, what's the problem?

No, Gays are seriously in jeopardy of looking like they cannot accept what they already have and will instigate a witch hunt after an elderly woman who broke no laws, served her constituents as a MP for years and voted for her religious beliefs.

I salute those posters who have said they are Gay but will not let Shane's rabble rousing on social media and LGBTs agendas stop them from leading a very full & happy life and would abhor what has been happening in their name.

One last point, those who attack Ann at every turn might be very surprised that life does not begin and end in what's in your pants. It is only a part of life and one which seems to consume those who presumably are sexually active anyway, what more do you want? Demand demand demand, is all I have read on here, you do as we say or you are this or that. No we are not, you can't make us it by name calling or labeling. Some of the childish posts on here are pitiful, just pitiful yet they think we will say, Yes of course you are right. What might happen is that Gays could face a backlash because of their demands.

They are not the biggest group in the population yet by anymeans, yet make the loudest noises. There is a thing called a silent majority which is happy to accommodate all people, races, orientations and opinions, but to push them too far by the sort of behaviour that has gone on recently could very well be to the detriment of everything achieved by those who worked so hard to achieve them.

Amazing ... post of the day award to you my lovely

Paula D · 31-01-2018, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pontyboi

It was assault.

The **** he told me as an 18 year old I was so shocked.

He went on to be Mr gay UK though so good for him.....the **** he described to me is like something you see on american horror story.

How can we support any of these issues? This isn't directed at you Vicky just at everyone I know if one of your children turned out gay you as a good person would not endorse them being made to have 1950s style electric shock treatment.

Ive loved how housemates have been able to talk freely this year it's made it a social experiment again but Ann to me is the female version of hitler.

So now Ann has killed people has she?

What an atrocious statement.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Niamh. · 31-01-2018, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paula D

We're not talking about the legal definition Niamh.

I disagree with you, no-one should be encouraging one person to attack another.

I didn't say people should do that though

Fetch The Bolt Cutters · 31-01-2018, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paula D

So now Ann has killed people has she?

What an atrocious statement.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

probably

she looks the type

pontyboi · 31-01-2018, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paula D

So now Ann has killed people has she?

What an atrocious statement.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Ffs I was comparing her to someone who had a grudge against a certain group of people which Ann has allways had.

I never said Ann killed people infact Hitler got his followers to do it.

I think we can both agree that Ann's views on curing gays is backwards! No?!

joeysteele · 31-01-2018, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paula D

So now Ann has killed people has she?

What an atrocious statement.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Any valid comment as to the horrific content of the account of the poster's friend and what happened to him.

Or is it easier to just deflect from the things Ann actually has appeared to support such as this vicious so called therapy.

Marsh. · 31-01-2018, 07:58 PM

Deflection, ignorance, selective memory.

Jamie89 · 31-01-2018, 08:03 PM

This thread reminded me of the scene in Bruno where he talks to a conversion therapist (or might have been ex-gay) but I couldn't find the clip and found this instead

it's pretty funny so I thought I'd post it

Youtube video

joeysteele · 31-01-2018, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Why on earth does he need the support of others to challenge her though? That makes it sound even worse tbh. I cannot bring up something thats bothering me unless I have managed to convince everyone around me to back me up when I say it? Nah.

Its not misconstrued at all. It was clear what he was doing and he did want Wayne to go and start.

I would have respected him for doing this. Very near the start of the show he had this out with Ann about her voting record, and it seemed a mature convo where they were polar opposites but both respected each others right to an opinion.

I am not bothered at all about him challenging her on her views. I like conversations about difficult topics. I just dislike the childish sneaking around behind someones back. Seems the rest of the housemates (bar Malika) agree too.

I dont see it your way sorry.
I only see him as wrong for not going to Ann directly.

Other than that as someone else said, the previous night Wayne had mouthed off against Ann.

Wayne inferred he felt Shane would have liked him to approach Ann on the rights issue but Wayne clearly said to Amanda that Shane had not asked him to.
Shane misguidedly possibly thought Wayne may have sided with him.

Also,I have myself,come across a fair number of people who need possibly,or seek support for their position before raIsing possibly contentious issues with others.

We disagree on his reasoning.
I just neither see him being really vindictive or bad.

Misguided as to his hopes and wrong to not just go to Ann directly.
That to me is all I concluded,I saw little to really get at him for on it.

Cherie · 31-01-2018, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Oh please, if it was a programme about Gay rights, LGBT or other serious issues you would be right.

But it is not, it is an entertainment show. So many just want to feel morally superior whilst not knowing the basics of why, how, what Ann's reasons were, just that they want to score antiquated points.

So what if you are right, slap on the back, well done, you have surely shown it to Ann, good for you, hurray, and millions more of plaudits for showing little old Ann just how magnanimous you are when bringing up her past, voting records, mariage status, sexual habits and the kitchen sink.

OK noted, understood, underlined, gold star, woohoo, does it change anything which hasn't already been changed? A big fat NO. Will Ann change her mind Another big fat NO, will it bother Ann, yet another big fat NO.

CBB is a television reality show, the theme is the Year of the Woman, not Gay Rights, LGBT agendas and one Drag act.

There were many housemates who haven't whined on and on for something which they have already received. Gays have got it, what's the problem?

No, Gays are seriously in jeopardy of looking like they cannot accept what they already have and will instigate a witch hunt after an elderly woman who broke no laws, served her constituents as a MP for years and voted for her religious beliefs.

I salute those posters who have said they are Gay but will not let Shane's rabble rousing on social media and LGBTs agendas stop them from leading a very full & happy life and would abhor what has been happening in their name.

One last point, those who attack Ann at every turn might be very surprised that life does not begin and end in what's in your pants. It is only a part of life and one which seems to consume those who presumably are sexually active anyway, what more do you want? Demand demand demand, is all I have read on here, you do as we say or you are this or that. No we are not, you can't make us it by name calling or labeling. Some of the childish posts on here are pitiful, just pitiful yet they think we will say, Yes of course you are right. What might happen is that Gays could face a backlash because of their demands.

They are not the biggest group in the population yet by anymeans, yet make the loudest noises. There is a thing called a silent majority which is happy to accommodate all people, races, orientations and opinions, but to push them too far by the sort of behaviour that has gone on recently could very well be to the detriment of everything achieved by those who worked so hard to achieve them over the years.

Post of the decade