Alex is sharing the money

[jet]

When asked on OKTV she said 'It's being sorted'. :D

[Pyramid*]

When asked on OKTV she said 'It's being sorted'. :D

Which doesn't necessarily equate to "Yes, I am sharing".

Absolute proof of her saying "yes, I am sharing as we agreed" please, or it didn't happen.

[jet]

Which doesn't necessarily equate to "Yes, I am sharing".

Absolute proof of her saying "yes, I am sharing as we agreed" please, or it didn't happen.

Okay :joker::joker::joker:
I suppose if Aaron had said 'It's being sorted' you would say the same thing? I so enjoy reading reactions like this :joker::joker::joker:

[Parmy]

She's sharing......Don't get sucked in Jet.


Now will Aaron?

[Angus]

Since none of them have received a single penny yet, isn't it premature to be speculating about who has or has not shared yet? Intentions are not deeds. Let's wait and see who does what, not that I'm particularly a*sed - it's their money, not mine so what business is it of anyone's:idc:

[Parmy]

Maybe you could go and ask him angus or pyramid...he's on twitter at the moment.

[thesheriff443]

aaron wont be shareing!

[Lex]

They will all share...I've no doubt!! :idc:

The only pity is that Tom will get more than a tenner! :devil:

I bet Aaron wish that he'd never made that stupid in-the-heat-of-the-moment pact with Waggot! :bawling:

[Pyramid*]

Maybe you could go and ask him angus or pyramid...he's on twitter at the moment.

not on twitter Parm...... so it would be a smidgen difficult don't you think.

[Pyramid*]

Okay :joker::joker::joker:
I suppose if Aaron had said 'It's being sorted' you would say the same thing? I so enjoy reading reactions like this :joker::joker::joker:

yes I would actually.

that's the difference between you and I - I would actually say the very same thing.

[Parmy]

not on twitter Parm...... so it would be a smidgen difficult don't you think.

As difficult as opening an account on twitter would be to you I guess.

[Pyramid*]

As difficult as opening an account on twitter would be to you I guess.

No interest in doing so, it's not my bag I'm afraid.

[Parmy]

No interest in doing so, it's not my bag I'm afraid.

This more your scene?

http://i42.tinypic.com/6oizkl.jpg

[Pyramid*]

This more your scene?



I'm no fool Parm. I thought you'd have sussed that one out by now. ;)

[Parmy]

I'm no fool Parm. I thought you'd have sussed that one out by now. ;)

LOL. 100 poercent not a fool..I couldn't find a stubborn bugger one though.:joker:

[Pyramid*]

LOL. 100 poercent not a fool..I couldn't find a stubborn bugger one though.:joker:


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRh5uCZMXb5-IRw2Iv3wT7RZ9BTv2mCDJA3EfAd0_Yuvh8b4fug

you aint looking hard enough ..... come on.... give yersel a shake !!


:D

[Parmy]

It's not a bag..It wouldn't have worked.

[Pyramid*]

It's not a bag..It wouldn't have worked.


http://images5.cpcache.com/product/66571275v8_480x480_Front.jpg

you really don't have much staying power ...... tut tut ... hee hee....

there...howzat. Will that do?

:spin:

[Parmy]

thats the one, gid on ye.

[joeysteele]

No interest in doing so, it's not my bag I'm afraid.

I have an account on Twitter now but simply cannot be bothered with it, limited characters in a message and a ridiculous accumulation of tweets from those you choose to follow.
You are wise to stay off it, it's a waste of time and energy in my opinion.

Alex could have said very clearly ofcourse I am and it will be done soon, ''it's getting sorted'' seems rather vague.I do think she will though.

As for Aaron sharing with Jay, then I don't see why he should share hi 50k and I think he was foolish to even go along with it in jest or being serious.

I'd like to know when someone though is going to ask Jay and if Jay is in fact handing over his extra 5k also to the fund for the other finalists, his Mother says he only has the 15k he won from BB so far, well he shouldn't have 15k,he should only have 10k like Alex,Tom, Louise and himself.
Possibly another 2.5k max. if Aaron decided not to take his part of that agreement.

[Parmy]

once again joey..jays mum never said he ahd 15k.

[Pyramid*]

once again joey..jays mum never said he ahd 15k.

Once again pamnion: Alex hasn't said she will share her money either. Not quite..... so it's all supposition.

Facts please, hard evidence or it didn't happen.

:D

[joeysteele]

once again joey..jays mum never said he ahd 15k.

Well if I am wrong in that assumption then I of course retract it, I haven't read her articles or much of what she says,I have really no interset in what she may have said or not said particularly. Someone on here who started a thread said Jays Mother had said that Aaron had gone back on his word as to sharing the 50k,adding that Jay only had the 15k from the split.

I took that as right so I accept I could be wrong,so now withdarw that part of my post above, someone said it,so they must too be wrong.
In any event, my point as to has he handed over the extra 15k still stands though and it seems no one is questioning that or him as to that too.

[kisywisy]

once again joey..jays mum never said he ahd 15k.


^^this!! :D

[Mystic Mock]

If I was Alex I would keep the money lol.

[kisywisy]

If I was Alex I would keep the money lol.


:devil:

[thesheriff443]

aaron was prepared to go agaist everyone in the house when he did his saint aaron!,let me save baby alex from nominations!,im sure going back on his word with jay will be water off a ducks back!

[Mystic Mock]

Aaron did the most important things In Big Brother and thats being a gameplayer and entertaining,well done Aaron take the money.

[joeysteele]

once again joey..jays mum never said he ahd 15k.

I think you appear to be correct in that so I retract fully my comment as to Jay's Mother saying that comment.

I have looked through as much as I can and cannot find the thread it was said on so I have to back down on that and accept you are right.

My apologies,I usually ensure my info is correct and believed it to be so at the time but clearly I was mistaken.

[Mystic Mock]

I think you appear to be correct in that so I retract fully my comment as to Jay's Mother saying that comment.

I have looked through as much as I can and cannot find the thread it was said on so I have to back down on that and accept you are right.

My apologies,I usually ensure my info is correct and believed it to be so at the time but clearly I was mistaken.

Dont worry Joey,sometimes we make mistakes.

[kisywisy]

I think you appear to be correct in that so I retract fully my comment as to Jay's Mother saying that comment.

I have looked through as much as I can and cannot find the thread it was said on so I have to back down on that and accept you are right.

My apologies,I usually ensure my info is correct and believed it to be so at the time but clearly I was mistaken.

:thumbs:

[Parmy]

Once again pamnion: Alex hasn't said she will share her money either. Not quite..... so it's all supposition.

Facts please, hard evidence or it didn't happen.

:D

It came from the alex herself..

Q..Are you still sharing the money?

A..Yes, it's being sorted.


What more proof do you need?

[Parmy]

I think you appear to be correct in that so I retract fully my comment as to Jay's Mother saying that comment.

I have looked through as much as I can and cannot find the thread it was said on so I have to back down on that and accept you are right.

My apologies,I usually ensure my info is correct and believed it to be so at the time but clearly I was mistaken.

Thanks for that Joey, it's nice to see.

You're a good sort.

[jet]

yes I would actually.

that's the difference between you and I - I would actually say the very same thing.

Sure you would. :joker::joker::joker:

[Jords]

I would give 5k to Tom and thats it :tongue:

[Pyramid*]

Sure you would. :joker::joker::joker:

clearly you have had very selective vision then on the occasions I actually backed Jay and others, when I felt Aaron was in the wrong.

See.... don't assume unless you know the complete picture. ;)

[MTVN]

Good for her, hope they all honour their agreements

[Mystic Mock]

I would give 5k to Tom and thats it :tongue:

If I was held at gunpoint I would only give Tom another tenner.:joker:

[rk3388]

knew she would <3

[jet]

clearly you have had very selective vision then on the occasions I actually backed Jay and others, when I felt Aaron was in the wrong.

See.... don't assume unless you know the complete picture. ;)

If you did then I apologize. :thumbs:
I have also sympathized with Aaron on a few occasions. :)

[Glenn.]

Okay :joker::joker::joker:
I suppose if Aaron had said 'It's being sorted' you would say the same thing? I so enjoy reading reactions like this :joker::joker::joker:

And bringing up Aaron in a thread about Alex borders on the line of obsession.

Honestly Jet, can you think of nothing more to do than try and bate people into an argument about Aaron.

Its getting tiresome. BB is over.

Most BB fans get a life back after a series finishes. You obviously didn't have one before it started.

[Pyramid*]

It came from the alex herself..

Q..Are you still sharing the money?

A..Yes, it's being sorted.


What more proof do you need?

Copies of their bank statements, signed as being true copies of the original documentation, signed by owner of said statments, and embossed with a Notary's seal. That should about be enough proof for me.

When you have that to hand, I'll be the first one to offer my apologies.

[Pyramid*]

If you did then I apologize. :thumbs:
I have also sympathized with Aaron on a few occasions. :)

nah..it's cool but the apology is accepted (though honestly, wasn't needed). I did think Aaron was a bit out of order when the letterbomb thing took place, as well as a few other bits n bobs along the way.

I actually stuck up for Jay about using a different razor to shave his arse with , and then Aaron's hair with.... I was sure (and still am) that they were different ones.

See.....I'm not quite as unreasonable as I'm portrayed...close, but not quite ... tee hee. ;)

[Benjamin]

I knew she would share it. All these doubters out there that seem to always think the worst in everyone.

My love and respect for Alex has increased more. :love:

[jet]

And bringing up Aaron in a thread about Alex borders on the line of obsession.

Honestly Jet, can you think of nothing more to do than try and bate people into an argument about Aaron.

Its getting tiresome. BB is over.

Most BB fans get a life back after a series finishes. You obviously didn't have one before it started.

:joker: Yeah, I post on this forum all on my own and talk to myself. :joker:

[alex_front2]

Well Aaron, Jay, Tom and Louise aren't blind so she can't short change them!!

[Benjamin]

The money is being sorted, they still haven't got it yet, including Alex :tongue:

[alex_front2]

aaron was prepared to go agaist everyone in the house when he did his saint aaron!,let me save baby alex from nominations!,im sure going back on his word with jay will be water off a ducks back!

Aaron only wanted to save Alex for final to cleverly split the 'anti-Aaron' 'Geordie' vote against Jay. Aaron's nobody's fool. He's been a fan of the show since it began so knew how it works :tongue:

[Jules2]

I would give 5k to Tom and thats it :tongue:

If the magazines are correct Alex is just sharing with Tom. Could just be magazine talk?

[boomoo]

They will all share...I've no doubt!! :idc:

The only pity is that Tom will get more than a tenner! :devil:

I bet Aaron wish that he'd never made that stupid in-the-heat-of-the-moment pact with Waggot! :bawling:

Aaron was so desparate for money that when he heard the boos he thought he had lost and made an agreement to share. That is because he knew that Jay would share if he won. He also said to Gabby Logan that Jay was a decent person but he was not his type of person.

Dressed in a cardigan and acting like Hugh Grant I would say he got that right.

[Kazelle]

I hope she does share. She's very young, the money won't last her five minutes but her reputation as always being known as the greedy girl from BB, who went back on the deal, will be with her for the rest of her life. Not worth it in my opinion.

[BBfan6418]

If she is she hasn't given Lou her 1k.

RKOsGIRL ***ECHO***
@ I agree @Jackie_Elty @realjaymckray Did Alex share her money with ye? Cos I heard that she only shared it with Tom?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @RKOsGIRL she's give no 1 nout as far as a no a shared mine with lou like a said I would not many peoples kept in touch sham really

[Pyramid*]

If she is she hasn't given Lou her 1k.

RKOsGIRL ***ECHO***
@ I agree @Jackie_Elty @realjaymckray Did Alex share her money with ye? Cos I heard that she only shared it with Tom?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @RKOsGIRL she's give no 1 nout as far as a no a shared mine with lou like a said I would not many peoples kept in touch sham really


Didn't Jay agree to split with the remaining 4 and not just Louise? So he's part of the sham.

TBH - I think it was really shabby of BB - and I still am of the opinion that the votes were showing for weeks that Aaron was going to be the runaway winner and they simply didn't want him getting the full £100k.

[BBfan6418]

Didn't Jay agree to split with the remaining 4 and not just Louise? So he's part of the sham.

TBH - I think it was really shabby of BB - and I still am of the opinion that the votes were showing for weeks that Aaron was going to be the runaway winner and they simply didn't want him getting the full £100k.

They said they would split the money so everyone would get 10K. Common sense would suggest they would do it the easiest way possible. Which they probably discussed but wasn't shown on the HL's. Which is also why no one is questioning if Tom gave everyone 2 out of his 10 or Aaron 198 out of his 990.

[MTVN]

They said they would split the money so everyone would get 10K. Common sense would suggest they would do it the easiest way possible. Which they probably discussed but wasn't shown on the HL's. Which is also why no one is questioning if Tom gave everyone 2 out of his 10 or Aaron 198 out of his 990.

Good point :laugh:

[Pyramid*]

They said they would split the money so everyone would get 10K. Common sense would suggest they would do it the easiest way possible. Which they probably discussed but wasn't shown on the HL's. Which is also why no one is questioning if Tom gave everyone 2 out of his 10 or Aaron 198 out of his 990.


That's correct, they said they would all split the money so everyone would get 10k.

Jay can't critisise others when he's not done 'his bit' of the agreement either. (not that I blame him tbf) but he's in the same boat really.

It was a very bad move on BB's part from the start and was bound to end up like this.

[BBfan6418]

That's correct, they said they would all split the money so everyone would get 10k.

Jay can't critisise others when he's not done 'his bit' of the agreement either. (not that I blame him tbf) but he's in the same boat really.

It was a very bad move on BB's part from the start and was bound to end up like this.

Jay has done 'his bit' he split his money with Lou.

[Pyramid*]

Jay has done 'his bit' he split his money with Lou.

I must have missed the bit where all 5 housemates sat in the lounge area, hands out in front of them, each swearing on their mother's lives that they would share equally - because according to you, that didn't happen - Jay only said he'd give part of his to Louise? Or have I misinterpreted what you said above.


That said, I still think BB caused this - the money should have gone to the winner and we wouldn't have all this kerfuffle.

[Vicky.]

I must have missed the bit where all 5 housemates sat in the lounge area, hands out in front of them, each swearing on their mother's lives that they would share equally - because according to you, that didn't happen - Jay only said he'd give part of his to Louise? Or have I misinterpreted what you said above.


That said, I still think BB caused this - the money should have gone to the winner and we wouldn't have all this kerfuffle.
But they were meant to end up with 10k each (9500 lou/jay) after the split

Its much simpler for Jay to give Lou 5k(leaving himself with 10k/9500). Alex give her the other 1k.

That said, I couldnt care less who splits what anyway :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

its not the first time bb, used money as part of its attempt to devide the house,housemates took the easy route out by agreeing to share!,

[Pyramid*]

But they were meant to end up with 10k each (9500 lou/jay) after the split

Its much simpler for Jay to give Lou 5k(leaving himself with 10k/9500). Alex give her the other 1k.

That said, I couldnt care less who splits what anyway :laugh:

Yep, they were meant to.... but they didn't. It all boiled down mostly to Alex and Jay - the main winners in the 'BB allocation'.

Makes me all the more glad though that Aaron was not coerced into wasting £500 of his £990 on a gift for Alex/Tom !!! I bet Jay and Louise are ripping !!! tee hee. Serves them right for being sneaky anyhooooo !! :D

[Angus]

For someone who was allegedly so popular, Alex has a very poor following on Twitter, that is if you equate popularity with followers, Lol. Where did all her fans go?

[BBfan6418]

I must have missed the bit where all 5 housemates sat in the lounge area, hands out in front of them, each swearing on their mother's lives that they would share equally - because according to you, that didn't happen - Jay only said he'd give part of his to Louise? Or have I misinterpreted what you said above.


That said, I still think BB caused this - the money should have gone to the winner and we wouldn't have all this kerfuffle.

Never said it didn't happen. I just tend to listen to all the conversation and not stop at what I want to hear. Aaron said they would work it out so everyone gets 10K each. They did not show them working it out in the HL shows. But after they drew the names from the hat Tom made the statement "alex is the only that has to split, really." Since Jay said he did his part by splitting with Lou and no other HM is disputing this. It is safe to say the split would be Alex giving Aaron 9010, tom 9990 and Lou 1k. Jay would give Lou 5k.

Of course BB caused this. It is exactly what they wanted.

[jo1791]

Makes complete sense for Jay to give £5k to Louise, Louise is now only 1k down.

It is a poor show if Alex doesn't split seeing as she has already declared she is doing so on national tv, that was about 2 weeks ago!

[Pyramid*]

Never said it didn't happen. I just tend to listen to all the conversation and not stop at what I want to hear. Aaron said they would work it out so everyone gets 10K each. They did not show them working it out in the HL shows. But after they drew the names from the hat Tom made the statement "alex is the only that has to split, really." Since Jay said he did his part by splitting with Lou and no other HM is disputing this. It is safe to say the split would be Alex giving Aaron 9010, tom 9990 and Lou 1k. Jay would give Lou 5k.

Of course BB caused this. It is exactly what they wanted.

Neither do I stop at what I want to hear.... I was merely pointing out the facts of the actual agreement as we were showing on the Highlights show - everything thereafter is supposition.

Yes, agreed totally on BB causing all the kerfuffle......all because they didn't want Aaron to bag the full lot, that's pretty much a certaintly imo.

[BBfan6418]

Neither do I stop at what I want to hear.... I was merely pointing out the facts of the actual agreement as we were showing on the Highlights show - everything thereafter is supposition.

Yes, agreed totally on BB causing all the kerfuffle......all because they didn't want Aaron to bag the full lot, that's pretty much a certaintly imo.

The actual agreement was everyone would get 10K. Jay and Lou didn't so they have the right to criticize. I would be suprised if anyone in this forum agrees with what your saying. But then again, Jay is involved so I wouldn't be.

[Pyramid*]

The actual agreement was everyone would get 10K. Jay and Lou didn't so they have the right to criticize. I would be suprised if anyone in this forum agrees with what your saying. But then again, Jay is involved so I wouldn't be.

No the agreement was that they would pool all the monies together and then split it so all would get £10k each.

They have no right to criticise - how much did Jay and Louise pool together with the other housemates - you know, to Aaron and Tom for example? If they didn't - well, they are as bad as the people they are slagging off.

I'm not particularly bothered if anyone on this forum agrees with me or not, it's hardly going to affect my own view on it.

[Incensed]

No the agreement was that they would pool all the monies together and then split it so all would get £10k each.

They have no right to criticise - how much did Jay and Louise pool together with the other housemates - you know, to Aaron and Tom for example? If they didn't - well, they are as bad as the people they are slagging off.

I'm not particularly bothered if anyone on this forum agrees with me or not, it's hardly going to affect my own view on it.


:idc:

[Pyramid*]

:idc:

Oh...perfect timing. I've just poured myself a tea...... :joker:

[Incensed]

Oh...perfect timing. I've just poured myself a tea...... :joker:


Good for you! :hugesmile:

[Pyramid*]

Good for you! :hugesmile:

It is indeed. :thumbs:

I'd have asked you if you wanted a cup, being the caring, sharing type (unlike them housemates) but you already had your own brew it seems.

[jo1791]

No the agreement was that they would pool all the monies together and then split it so all would get £10k each.

They have no right to criticise - how much did Jay and Louise pool together with the other housemates - you know, to Aaron and Tom for example? If they didn't - well, they are as bad as the people they are slagging off.

I'm not particularly bothered if anyone on this forum agrees with me or not, it's hardly going to affect my own view on it.

No they agreed that everyone would get 10K each, not that they would pool it and then split it.

Makes perfect sense that Jay would give Lou £5k leaving Alex to split hers accordingly.

[BBfan6418]

No the agreement was that they would pool all the monies together and then split it so all would get £10k each.

They have no right to criticise - how much did Jay and Louise pool together with the other housemates - you know, to Aaron and Tom for example? If they didn't - well, they are as bad as the people they are slagging off.

I'm not particularly bothered if anyone on this forum agrees with me or not, it's hardly going to affect my own view on it.

There was never an agreement to pool the money together. Your Lord even said it before they found out how the split was going to happen. He said they would not let us split it because we could just go 11k, 9k, 11k, 9k, 10. and those that have 11k would give 1k to those that have 9k. You think the HM's were going to show up at a location with the money and divide it evenly? Sure Tom was going to show up with his 10, Aaron with his 990. They agreed each person would get 10K. No pooling money. Why do you dismiss the fact Tom said Alex is the only one that would have to split?

[Incensed]

It is indeed. :thumbs:

I'd have asked you if you wanted a cup, being the caring, sharing type (unlike them housemates) but you already had your own brew it seems.

Maybe your time would be better spent reading the responses to your post? :hugesmile:

[Pyramid*]

Maybe your time would be better spent reading the responses to your post? :hugesmile:

Maybe I am enjoying my tea to really bother too much, t'is hardly life or death a situation!. :hugesmile:

[Pyramid*]

No they agreed that everyone would get 10K each, not that they would pool it and then split it.

Makes perfect sense that Jay would give Lou £5k leaving Alex to split hers accordingly.

I disagree. If an agreement was made that everyone would get 10K - then to ensure a fair split - monies would have to be pooled together then split 5 ways.

I cannot recall EVER the housemates saying or agreeing ; "right, Jay, you give Louise x amount, Alex, you give Tom, Louise, and Aaron x amount". If you heard that, and can show me the clip I'll be the first one to offer you a very sincere apology.

[Pyramid*]

There was never an agreement to pool the money together. Your Lord even said it before they found out how the split was going to happen. He said they would not let us split it because we could just go 11k, 9k, 11k, 9k, 10. and those that have 11k would give 1k to those that have 9k. You think the HM's were going to show up at a location with the money and divide it evenly? Sure Tom was going to show up with his 10, Aaron with his 990. They agreed each person would get 10K. No pooling money. Why do you dismiss the fact Tom said Alex is the only one that would have to split?


See my previous post : here for ease of reference.



I disagree. If an agreement was made that everyone would get 10K - then to ensure a fair split - monies would have to be pooled together then split 5 ways.

I cannot recall EVER the housemates saying or agreeing ; "right, Jay, you give Louise x amount, Alex, you give Tom, Louise, and Aaron x amount". If you heard that, and can show me the clip I'll be the first one to offer you a very sincere apology.

[Incensed]

Maybe I am enjoying my tea to really bother too much, t'is hardly life or death a situation!. :hugesmile:

Tis a rock and roll life :hugesmile:

[Pyramid*]

Tis a rock and roll life :hugesmile:

Not when you have tea without any little extras..... other than sugar and milk.

sigh... them were the days!:joker:

[jo1791]

I disagree. If an agreement was made that everyone would get 10K - then to ensure a fair split - monies would have to be pooled together then split 5 ways.

I cannot recall EVER the housemates saying or agreeing ; "right, Jay, you give Louise x amount, Alex, you give Tom, Louise, and Aaron x amount". If you heard that, and can show me the clip I'll be the first one to offer you a very sincere apology.


Common sense tells you monies don't have to be pooled in order to be split equally and seeing that Jay and Louise are a couple and are kind of 'sorted' with what they were allocated, it leaves Alex, and only Alex, left to hand over the dosh:dance:

[MTVN]

I hope Tom has split his £10 5 ways

[Incensed]

Not when you have tea without any little extras..... other than sugar and milk.

sigh... them were the days!:joker:

:joker:

[jo1791]

I hope Tom has split his £10 5 ways

Tbf, Alex has probably given Tom some of her dosh!! Seeing as they are BFFs!!

[Pyramid*]

Common sense tells you monies don't have to be pooled in order to be split equally and seeing that Jay and Louise are a couple and are kind of 'sorted' with what they were allocated, it leaves Alex, and only Alex, left to hand over the dosh:dance:

My common sense tells me it's a hell of a lot easier for all monies to be pooled, and then split evenly 5 ways, rather than faffing about with "Jay you give Louise, Aaron, Tom x amount, Alex, you give Aaron Tom and Louise X amount".

:hugesmile:

[jo1791]

My common sense tells me it's a hell of a lot easier for all monies to be pooled, and then split evenly 5 ways, rather than faffing about with "Jay you give Louise, Aaron, Tom x amount, Alex, you give Aaron Tom and Louise X amount".

:hugesmile:

Oh give over!!!

All is required is for Alex to hand over monies to Aaron, Tom and Louise....how simples that!!! :hugesmile:

[Marsh.]

Pyramid, did you honestly expect them to cash in their prizes, sit in a room with all the money in 10s and 20s and split it 5 ways? How ridiculous.

Common sense says Jay and Alex give out to Tom, Aaron and Louise and then they're sorted.

[jo1791]

Jay has already split with Louise leaving only Alex to dish hers out, its hardly rocket science LOL :hugesmile:

[Pyramid*]

Oh give over!!!

All is required is for Alex to hand over monies to Aaron, Tom and Louise....how simples that!!! :hugesmile:

Pyramid, did you honestly expect them to cash in their prizes, sit in a room with all the money in 10s and 20s and split it 5 ways? How ridiculous.

Common sense says Jay and Alex give out to Tom, Aaron and Louise and then they're sorted.

Jay has already split with Louise leaving only Alex to dish hers out, its hardly rocket science LOL :hugesmile:


I've made my position quite clear. So you don't agree.... c'est la vie.

As for the denomination of notes: I don't particularly care if they did it with 1penny pieces, make not a jot of difference to me.

[jo1791]

I've made my position quite clear. So you don't agree.... c'est la vie.

As for the denomination of notes: I don't particularly care if they did it with 1penny pieces, make not a jot of difference to me.

preposterous!!!!:wavey:

[Pyramid*]

preposterous!!!!:wavey:

Ditto. :wavey:

[thesheriff443]

i would like to see 50 grand in pennies!

[Visage]

i would like to see 50 grand in pennies!

I would like to see 50 grand in my bank account.:D

[Pyramid*]

i would like to see 50 grand in pennies!

:laugh3::laugh3:

[BBfan6418]

See my previous post : here for ease of reference.

Why do you keep dismissing the fact Tom said "It's only Alex thats really got to split." Everyone else says "Yeah" then Tom states again "She's the only one thats got to split any money" While this was said Lou and Jay were loved up against each other on the couch. Common sense would say Tom made this comment because they saw Jay and Lou as 1. They had 19K. So Alex would just need to give them 1K. Then Alex gives Tom 9990 and Aaron 9010.

[jo1791]

Why do you keep dismissing the fact Tom said "It's only Alex thats really got to split." Everyone else says "Yeah" then Tom states again "She's the only one thats got to split any money" While this was said Lou and Jay were loved up against each other on the couch. Common sense would say Tom made this comment because they saw Jay and Lou as 1. They had 19K. So Alex would just need to give them 1K. Then Alex gives Tom 9990 and Aaron 9010.

Some of the brainiest lack common sense you know :laugh:

[jo1791]

Ditto. :wavey:

Not at all, your argument falls flat when you utter the words 'share equally'!!!

I've never heard such baloney and it's not like it it puts Aaron in a bad light either, i mean I wouldn't bring up the 'other' deal before Alex sees the first one through:hugesmile:

[BBfan6418]

Some of the brainiest lack common sense you know :laugh:

agree :hugesmile:

[fruit_cake]

if you trusted someone who short changed a blind woman to split 30k, you need your head screwing on a bit better

[Jordan.]

People still care about this? :suspect:

[Pyramid*]

Why do you keep dismissing the fact Tom said "It's only Alex thats really got to split." Everyone else says "Yeah" then Tom states again "She's the only one thats got to split any money" While this was said Lou and Jay were loved up against each other on the couch. Common sense would say Tom made this comment because they saw Jay and Lou as 1. They had 19K. So Alex would just need to give them 1K. Then Alex gives Tom 9990 and Aaron 9010.

Some of the brainiest lack common sense you know :laugh:

Not at all, your argument falls flat when you utter the words 'share equally'!!!

I've never heard such baloney and it's not like it it puts Aaron in a bad light either, i mean I wouldn't bring up the 'other' deal before Alex sees the first one through:hugesmile:


You both need to accept that I have my own thought processes .....whether you like it or not - just as you both have yours. It's served me well over the past 46 years, so I'll stick to how I work.

Wee bit of respect btw wouldn't go amiss when you're addressing another poster: no common sense required for that - just a little thing known as common courtesy.

[jo1791]

if you trusted someone who short changed a blind woman to split 30k, you need your head screwing on a bit better

That was a shocker!!!

If she wants any kind of career in the public eye, which I can only presume she does by appearing on BB, then she is doing herself no favours by not splitting the money. Not good pr!

I don't care whether she does or not but it is a valid topic of discussion.

[fruit_cake]

Wee bit of respect btw wouldn't go amiss when you're addressing another poster: no common sense required for that - just a little thing known as common courtesy.

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

[fruit_cake]

That was a shocker!!!

If she wants any kind of career in the public eye, which I can only presume she does by appearing on BB, then she is doing herself no favours by not splitting the money. Not good pr!

I don't care whether she does or not but it is a valid topic of discussion.

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

[Pyramid*]

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given. ;)

[fruit_cake]

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given. ;)

I'm not talking about the forum.

[Pyramid*]

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

How would you have done that exactly?

[jo1791]

You both need to accept that I have my own thought processes .....whether you like it or not - just as you both have yours. It's served me well over the past 46 years, so I'll stick to how I work.

Wee bit of respect btw wouldn't go amiss when you're addressing another poster: no common sense required for that - just a little thing known as common courtesy.

It seems that your thought processes take you all around the houses, just trying to 'simplify' things for you.

[fruit_cake]

How would you have done that exactly?

none of your business.

[Pyramid*]

I'm not talking about the forum.


So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

[Pyramid*]

none of your business.

pmsl!

[Pyramid*]

It seems that your thought processes take you all around the houses, just trying to 'simplify' things for you.

Kind offer but no need. Certainly no need when the housemates didn't keep to their word.

[BBfan6418]

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

You are doing the same thing. Why won't you comment on what Tom said? because it shoots your theory down. They don't have to show how the whole deal on the HL. It was spelled out. Tom made it perfectly clear when he made his statement and they all agreed and then he made the statement again.

[Pyramid*]

You are doing the same thing. Why won't you comment on what Tom said? because it shoots your theory down. They don't have to show how the whole deal on the HL. It was spelled out. Tom made it perfectly clear when he made his statement and they all agreed and then he made the statement again.

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

[BBfan6418]

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.
Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.
That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

No one is forcing you to do anything. I provided facts to back up my comments.

You have been debating over ifs and buts the whole season. We were only given a 45 min edited HL show to watch. so a lot of discussions took place off camera.

[Pyramid*]

No one is forcing you to do anything. I provided facts to back up my comments.

You have been debating over ifs and buts the whole season. We were only given a 45 min edited HL show to watch. so a lot of discussions took place off camera.

None of which negates my own right to offer my own view on the easiest way for the money to have been split - which is what you are disputing.

As I said, not that matters because Alex very much appears to have renaiged on her deal with the others.

[jo1791]

Kind offer but no need. Certainly no need when the housemates didn't keep to their word.


Take the 's' from housemates and you are nearly there.

Alex has the £30k which needs spitting, Jay has already split his money with Louise!!

[Pyramid*]

Take the 's' from housemates and you are nearly there.

Alex has the £30k which needs spitting, Jay has already split his money with Louise!!


I will see it as I chose to, not how you decide I should.

[jo1791]

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

Seeing as Jay has already given £5k to Louise the only person who can physically split any monies is Alex so how could they have all not kept to the agreement? It is only Alex who needs to do anything!


I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Anybody with common sense would see sense...

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

Plenty has been said in the media, Alex said herself on OKTV that she would be splitting her share accordingly... FACTs like this should not be ignored!!


Fact is only Alex and Jay had to share, Jay has done so with Louise so it is up to Alex to do the rest. All this talk about having to pool the money is nonsensical!!

[jo1791]

None of which negates my own right to offer my own view on the easiest way for the money to have been split - which is what you are disputing.

As I said, not that matters because Alex very much appears to have renaiged on her deal with the others.

OMG well done!! WE have arrived!!

Thank you yes, Alex went back on the deal!!

[jo1791]

I will see it as I chose to, not how you decide I should.

Choose to, not chose to!!

[Pyramid*]

Fact is only Alex and Jay had to share, Jay has done so with Louise so it is up to Alex to do the rest. All this talk about having to pool the money is nonsensical!!

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

I've quoted my post above - rather than the 'amended' / 'altered' version you put up.

Look, you can argue till the cows come home. I have my view on it. You have yours - and we disagree. That's it in a nutshell.

[Pyramid*]

OMG well done!! WE have arrived!!

Thank you yes, Alex went back on the deal!!

forgive me here, but isn't the thread about ALEX ..... ;)

Choose to, not chose to!!

Good god.

[jo1791]

I've quoted my post above - rather than the 'amended' / 'altered' version you put up.

Look, you can argue till the cows come home. I have my view on it. You have yours - and we disagree. That's it in a nutshell.

Can't argue with FACTS.

[jo1791]

forgive me here, but isn't the thread about ALEX ..... ;)



Yes it is, on how Alex has gone back on the deal, no one else ;)

[Pyramid*]

Can't argue with FACTS.

Yes it is, on how Alex has gone back on the deal, no one else ;)

You're boring me to death now.

[jo1791]

You're boring me to death now.

Not here to entertain you, just put you right on a few things, based on FACTS;):joker:

[Pyramid*]

Not here to entertain you, just put you right on a few things, based on FACTS;):joker:

The facts being that I am entitled to my OWN VIEW, which has not changed, in respect of how the monies should have been shared out - regardless of whether you share my view or not.

;)

[jo1791]

The facts being that I am entitled to my OWN VIEW, which has not changed, in respect of how the monies should have been shared out - regardless of whether you share my view or not.

;)

I base my opinions on FACTS, like many others do when facts are available. If you don't then god help you!! ;)

[Pyramid*]

I base my opinions on FACTS, like many others do when facts are available. If you don't then god help you!! ;)

Deary me - getting personal now are we. :nono:

[jo1791]

Deary me - getting personal now are we. :nono:

Not at all, although very telling that you'd think that.

[Niamh.]

Back on topic please guys, before one of you does actually get personal

[jo1791]

The topic is about Alex sharing the money. As Alex has the money it is her responsiblity and hers only. None of this 'pooling' notion or proportioning blame onto others when they have absolutely no control over the matter!

Other members have split, ie. Jay to Louise so therefore have kept to the original deal.

That's it basically:)

[Pyramid*]

The topic is about Alex sharing the money. As Alex has the money it is her responsiblity and hers only. None of this 'pooling' notion or proportioning blame onto others when they have absolutely no control over the matter!

Other members have split, ie. Jay to Louise so therefore have kept to the original deal.

That's it basically:)

Well Alex ain't sharing. So it's dead in the water.

[jo1791]

Well Alex ain't sharing. So it's dead in the water.

She hopes;)

[thesheriff443]

its not a big deal to me that alex is not spliting the money,any one who has been thru the audition process will know the type of person that get put in the house,

[Pyramid*]

its not a big deal to me that alex is not spliting the money,any one who has been thru the audition process will know the type of person that get put in the house,

Who is it exactly that's making a deal out of it all anyway - out of the 5 housemates?

I doubt it would be Aaron, coz he's won far more anyway due to him winning the £50k.

Tom - bless him with his tenner.

That just leaves Jay and Louise - who between them, pulled in £14,500, and £3500 after the £500 gifts they bought were taken off.

so who's the housemate that's bitching about Alex then? Jay/Louise?

[jo1791]

Who is it exactly that's making a deal out of it all anyway - out of the 5 housemates?

I doubt it would be Aaron, coz he's won far more anyway due to him winning the £50k.

Tom - bless him with his tenner.

That just leaves Jay and Louise - who between them, pulled in £14,500, and £3500 after the £500 gifts they bought were taken off.
so who's the housemate that's bitching about Alex then? Jay/Louise?

When asked a question in an interview what are they supposed to do? They have every right to give their opinion and state facts, which is what they did. Any comments they have tweeted have been responses to questions.

Hardly bitching:joker:

I actually think Tom got his share, he'd hardly be best friends with Alex otherwise!!

But you are right about Aaron, he got £50k and is in no position to slate Alex when he himself didn't keep his word with the other deal he made with Jay;)

[Pyramid*]

When asked a question in an interview what are they supposed to do? They have every right to give their opinion and state facts, which is what they did. Any comments they have tweeted have been responses to questions.

Hardly bitching:joker:

I actually think Tom got his share, he'd hardly be best friends with Alex otherwise!!

But you are right about Aaron, he got £50k and is in no position to slate Alex when he himself didn't keep his word with the other deal he made with Jay;)

First of all. Let's stick to what you like to discuss....Facts. I didn't say that Jay or Louise did not have a right to give an answer to a question they were asked. Neither did I say they were not entitled to their own opinion.

Given that you highlighed Jay/Louise from my last post ...... it's as equally a poor show that they are bitching (for that is what they are doing imo), when they actually got £19k between them. They are in effect - mouthing off about £1k. They should be thankful for what they got to be honest!

Guess they thought spending a grand of that on pressies would 'buy them' Alex's loyalty. The pair of them have a lot to learn. Some people cannot be bought. Good on Alex. ;)

[jo1791]

First of all. Let's stick to what you like to discuss....Facts. I didn't say that Jay or Louise did not have a right to give an answer to a question they were asked. Neither did I say they were not entitled to their own opinion.

Given that you highlighed Jay/Louise from my last post ...... it's as equally a poor show that they are bitching (for that is what they are doing imo), when they actually got £19k between them. They are in effect - mouthing off about £1k. They should be thankful for what they got to be honest!

Guess they thought spending a grand of that on pressies would 'buy them' Alex's loyalty. The pair of them have a lot to learn. Some people cannot be bought. Good on Alex. ;)

Like I said, they weren't bitching, just answering question;)

Still owed money so have every right to mouth off, I hope they shout it from the roof tops!!! :)

They were silly to buy the presents yes, but that's a seperate issue!

[Pyramid*]

Like I said, they weren't bitching, just answering question;)

Still owed money so have every right to mouth off, I hope they shout it from the roof tops!!! :)

They were silly to buy the presents yes, but that's a seperate issue!

Can you clarify, very clearly for me please. I am correct in stating that the only ones that are making any issue out of Alex not sharing are Jay/Louise - who literally are only short of £1k between them - despite them having received £19k (less their own choice of spending £1k on gifts on Alex and Tom).

They are posting negative comments over £1k when they in fact were allocated £19k between them, less what they chose to spend on birthday gifts? I have got this correct...yes.

[jo1791]

Can you clarify, very clearly for me please. I am correct in stating that the only ones that are making any issue out of Alex not sharing are Jay/Louise - who literally are only short of £1k between them - despite them having received £19k (less their own choice of spending £1k on gifts on Alex and Tom).

They are posting negative comments over £1k when they in fact were allocated £19k between them, less what they chose to spend on birthday gifts? I have got this correct...yes.

I don't see them making an issue out of it no!

When asked a question about it they say it as it is...I'm sure if you hold evidence to say otherwise you can provide links;)

But thanks for clarifying that you do understand that Jay has split his money;)

Hope the bold bit is clear enough:)

[Pyramid*]

I don't see them making an issue out of it no!

When asked a question about it they say it as it is...I'm sure if you hold evidence to say otherwise you can provide links;)

But thanks for clarifying that you do understand that Jay has split his money;)

Hope the bold bit is clear enough:)


Glad we got that cleared up: that the only ones making any issue out of it, enough to be tweeting about it all....is.....oh, now let me think here...that'll be Jay/Louise eh! All because they were 'done out of' a grand, having pocketed 18 times that amount after birthday gift costs were deducted.

How petty!

:D

[MTVN]

Glad we got that cleared up: that the only ones making any issue out of it, enough to be tweeting about it all....is.....oh, now let me think here...that'll be Jay/Louise eh! All because they were 'done out of' a grand, having pocketed 18 times that amount after birthday gift costs were deducted.

How petty!

:D

Err that's because he was asked about it on Twitter. And Aaron talked about it live on national television.

[jo1791]

Glad we got that cleared up: that the only ones making any issue out of it, enough to be tweeting about it all....is.....oh, now let me think here...that'll be Jay/Louise eh! All because they were 'done out of' a grand, having pocketed 18 times that amount after birthday gift costs were deducted.

How petty!

:D

I repeat, they were asked questions...they haven't tweeted off their own accord, just like Aaron responded when asked about it, just like Tom and just like Alex herself...who lied btw!!

[Pyramid*]

Err that's because he was asked about it on Twitter. And Aaron talked about it live on national television.

I repeat, they were asked questions...they haven't tweeted off their own accord, just like Aaron responded when asked about it, just like Tom and just like Alex herself...who lied btw!!


I don't believe I inferred otherwise. My point is that the two who appear to not be happy about being done out of a measely £1k (in comparison to what they received, £18k together) are ....Jay and Louise.

Still petty, that's my opinion and I'm perfectly entitled to give my opinion. :)

[MTVN]

I don't believe I inferred otherwise. My point is that the two who appear to not be happy about being done out of a measely £1k (in comparison to what they received, £18k together) are ....Jay and Louise.

Still petty, that's my opinion and I'm perfectly entitled to give my opinion. :)

And what gives you that impression? Stating a fact that the money hasn't been split hardly translates to them being the only two who are getting worked up about it, they don't really seem that bothered

Answer this, why does Jay telling someone on Twitter that it hasn't been shared mean that he must be more bothered by it than Aaron, who said it live on national television?

[BBfan6418]

I don't believe I inferred otherwise. My point is that the two who appear to not be happy about being done out of a measely £1k (in comparison to what they received, £18k together) are ....Jay and Louise.

Still petty, that's my opinion and I'm perfectly entitled to give my opinion. :)

Where are you getting Jay and Lou are "not happy about being done out?"
I have not seen Lou comment about it yet. I follow Jay on twitter and see people ask him daily about Alex splitting the money. Just by looking at the replies to his tweets I bet he gets asked over 100 times a day. He has replied to a few of them.

mz_gael mz_gael
@ @RealJayMcKray alex hasn't shared and you haven't kept in touch? so do you regret the £500 birthday presents yet?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @mz_gael no na a done it cos a wanted 2 other people were happy and that made me happy so it was worth it , it's nice 2 give

RKOsGIRL ***ECHO***
@ I agree @Jackie_Elty @realjaymckray Did Alex share her money with ye? Cos I heard that she only shared it with Tom?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @RKOsGIRL she's give no 1 nout as far as a no a shared mine with lou like a said I would not many peoples kept in touch sham really


shacky9 paul shackleton
@ @RealJayMcKray one ques for you lad.. Did u all get a shere Ov that £50k u was all suppose to get £10k each? Or she keep it all Lol..

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @shacky9 she kept it lol a shared mine with lou

[Pyramid*]

And what gives you that impression? Stating a fact that the money hasn't been split hardly translates to them being the only two who are getting worked up about it, they don't really seem that bothered

Answer this, why does Jay telling someone on Twitter that it hasn't been shared mean that he must be more bothered by it than Aaron, who said it live on national television?



It's my opinion... on Jay and Louise, and the manner in which Jay has chosen to reply to a question asked of him. That's perfectably acceptable. Perhaps not in agreement with your own view MTVN, but it is still perfectly acceptable a reply.

[Pyramid*]

Where are you getting Jay and Lou are "not happy about being done out?"
I have not seen Lou comment about it yet. I follow Jay on twitter and see people ask him daily about Alex splitting the money. Just by looking at the replies to his tweets I bet he gets asked over 100 times a day. He has replied to a few of them.

mz_gael mz_gael
@ @RealJayMcKray alex hasn't shared and you haven't kept in touch? so do you regret the £500 birthday presents yet?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @mz_gael no na a done it cos a wanted 2 other people were happy and that made me happy so it was worth it , it's nice 2 give

RKOsGIRL ***ECHO***
@ I agree @Jackie_Elty @realjaymckray Did Alex share her money with ye? Cos I heard that she only shared it with Tom?

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @RKOsGIRL she's give no 1 nout as far as a no a shared mine with lou like a said I would not many peoples kept in touch sham really


shacky9 paul shackleton
@ @RealJayMcKray one ques for you lad.. Did u all get a shere Ov that £50k u was all suppose to get £10k each? Or she keep it all Lol..

@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @shacky9 she kept it lol a shared mine with lou


good on Alex I say!. Like I said, 'sham really' says it all for me.

Poor Jay, petted lip is showing. Bless.

[MTVN]

It's my opinion... on Jay and Louise, and the manner in which Jay has chosen to reply to a question asked of him. That's perfectably acceptable. Perhaps not in agreement with your own view MTVN, but it is still perfectly acceptable a reply.

Sure it's opinion, but it seems there is very little basis for having such an opinion, it looks like you're just scraping the barrel for things to try to criticise Jay over. I mean the guy answered a question, how very dare he!!

[thesheriff443]

[QUOTE=Pyramid*;4784407]Who is it exactly that's making a deal out of it all anyway - out of the 5 housemates?





its not so much of housemates makeing it a big deal,more:xyxwave: forum members,

[Niamh.]

good on Alex I say!. Like I said, 'sham really' says it all for me.

Poor Jay, petted lip is showing. Bless.

How is Jay saying it's a shame people haven't stayed in touch him pouting or whatever you're suggesting? :conf:

[BBfan6418]

nah..it's cool but the apology is accepted (though honestly, wasn't needed). I did think Aaron was a bit out of order when the letterbomb thing took place, as well as a few other bits n bobs along the way.

I actually stuck up for Jay about using a different razor to shave his arse with , and then Aaron's hair with.... I was sure (and still am) that they were different ones.
See.....I'm not quite as unreasonable as I'm portrayed...close, but not quite ... tee hee. ;)


You thought you were right before.....


Gabriellee1996 Gabrielle Bradbeer
@ @RealJayMcKray when in the house, did you shave aaron's head with the same razor you used to shave your ass?


@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @Gabriellee1996 yes a did hehe x

[Pyramid*]

Sure it's opinion, but it seems there is very little basis for having such an opinion, it looks like you're just scraping the barrel for things to try to criticise Jay over. I mean the guy answered a question, how very dare he!!


and I put up my opinion. How very dare I.

I'll criticise Jay on whatever I wish to.


How is Jay saying it's a shame people haven't stayed in touch him pouting or whatever you're suggesting? :conf:


Sham is not the same as shame.

I'm not suggesting anything - if Jay uses the word 'sham' I'll take it that when Jay says 'sham', that he means 'sham'..... unless people here are reading Jay's mind.

You thought you were right before.....


Gabriellee1996 Gabrielle Bradbeer
@ @RealJayMcKray when in the house, did you shave aaron's head with the same razor you used to shave your ass?


@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @Gabriellee1996 yes a did hehe x


Sorry....what on earth has this to do with this thread? Oh... I see. Nothing. Nothing at all - other than very petty point scoring? So the agenda is that, rather than discussing the thread.

I rest my case. ;)

[Niamh.]

and I put up my opinion. How very dare I.

I'll criticise Jay on whatever I wish to.





Sham is not the same as shame.

I'm not suggesting anything - if Jay uses the word 'sham' I'll take it that when Jay says 'sham', that he means 'sham'..... unless people here are reading Jay's mind.




Sorry....what on earth has this to do with this thread? Oh... I see. Nothing. Nothing at all - other than very petty point scoring? So the agenda is that, rather than discussing the thread.

I rest my case. ;)

I'm pretty sure he meant shame, it's the way he talks and would fit into that sentence better.

[MTVN]

Sham is not the same as shame.

I'm not suggesting anything - if Jay uses the word 'sham' I'll take it that when Jay says 'sham', that he means 'sham'..... unless people here are reading Jay's mind.


LOL he obviously meant "shame"

[Pyramid*]

I'm pretty sure he meant shame, it's the way he talks and would fit into that sentence better.

LOL he obviously meant "shame"

Well let's look at the facts of what he ACTUALLY wrote ...rather than what you both 'think' he meant.

The man said SHAM. Not shame.

[Niamh.]

Well let's look at the facts of what he ACTUALLY wrote ...rather than what you both 'think' he meant.

The man said SHAM. Not shame.

He also uses "a" instead of "I"............it's quite obvious what he meant.

[BBfan6418]

Sorry....what on earth has this to do with this thread? Oh... I see. Nothing. Nothing at all - other than very petty point scoring? So the agenda is that, rather than discussing the thread.

I rest my case. ;)[/QUOTE]



That was in response to a post YOU made on THIS THREAD. Go back to page 2 and you will see it.

[MTVN]

Well let's look at the facts of what he ACTUALLY wrote ...rather than what you both 'think' he meant.

The man said SHAM. Not shame.

Well stop taking it literally, you can see his tweets are littered with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, common sense tells us it is far more logical he meant "shame" considering the context it was said in

[Pyramid*]

Well stop taking it literally, you can see his tweets are littered with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, common sense tells us it is far more logical he meant "shame" considering the context it was said in

I will take what I read, in whichever manner I wish to MTVN, without being told by you, how I should and should not read something that is not actually written....literally or otherwise.

The fact of the matter is: Jay used the word sham. Not shame.

Just because it doesn't fit in with how you wish to construe his tweet, does not mean that I have to accept that he made an error. I don't believe he did. I believe that he did in fact mean 'Sham really'.... meaning that the whole idea of them all (Alex if you prefer) sharing the money has turned into a sham really.

That fits quite perfectly also, dependant on viewpoint.

That's very much my take on it - and I am perfectly entitled to put that over without being told that I should not have my own opinon, and being told to 'Well, stop taking it literally'.

I shall take it, as I find it. The man said SHAM. That is indeed factual, it's there for all to read.

[MTVN]

I will take what I read, in whichever manner I wish to MTVN, without being told by you, how I should and should not read something that is not actually written....literally or otherwise.

The fact of the matter is: Jay used the word sham. Not shame.

Just because it doesn't fit in with how you wish to construe his tweet, does not mean that I have to accept that he made an error. I don't believe he did. I believe that he did in fact mean 'Sham really'.... meaning that the whole idea of them all (Alex if you prefer) sharing the money has turned into a sham really.

That fits quite perfectly also, dependant on viewpoint.

That's very much my take on it - and I am perfectly entitled to put that over without being told that I should not have my own opinon, and being told to 'Well, stop taking it literally'.

I shall take it, as I find it. The man said SHAM. That is indeed factual, it's there for all to read.

Ok fine, you stick to your religious devotion to "facts" and I'll stick to what I consider to be basic logic and common sense :)

[Niamh.]

Oy Vey.

[Pyramid*]

Ok fine, you stick to your religious devotion to "facts" and I'll stick to what I consider to be basic logic and common sense :)

Are you inferring here MTVN that my own view is not also based on logic and common sense - and rather than you simply disagreeing with my view: you are completely disrespecting it?. If you could clarify please.

[WCR1942]

Anyone know the address of ACAS?

[Pyramid*]

Anyone know the address of ACAS?

:amazed:

Superb idea!

:joker:

[MTVN]

Are you inferring here MTVN that my own view is not also based on logic and common sense - and rather than you simply disagreeing with my view: you are completely disrespecting it?. If you could clarify please.

I think that, in my mind, to hold a dogmatic adherence to "the facts" would be a bit foolish in this instance considering that, what I consider to be logic and common sense would lead most to believe it much more likely that it was a simple misspelling, as is a frequent occurrence in Jay's tweets

[Niamh.]

I think that, in my mind, to hold a dogmatic adherence to "the facts" would be a bit foolish in this instance considering that, what I consider to be logic and common sense would lead most to believe it much more likely that it was a simple misspelling, as is a frequent occurrence in Jay's tweets

:worship:

[Pyramid*]

I think that, in my mind, to hold a dogmatic adherence to "the facts" would be a bit foolish in this instance considering that, what I consider to be logic and common sense would lead most to believe it much more likely that it was a simple misspelling, as is a frequent occurrence in Jay's tweets

I didn't ask what you considered in your mind.

I asked quite specifically if you are inferring that my own very reasoned posts, based on factual content in respect of Jay's actual tweet - cannot be regarded as being based on logic and common sense. Whether I am being rigid in using the basis of Jay's actual wording or not.

I don't think I'm being unreasonable in asking you to very clearly, very specifically answer what I asked.

[Pyramid*]

:worship:
It this some indication here that the view held by youself and MTVN are the only views that are to be accepted on this thread?

[MTVN]

I didn't ask what you considered in your mind.

I asked quite specifically if you are inferring that my own very reasoned posts, based on factual content in respect of Jay's actual tweet - cannot be regarded as being based on logic and common sense. Whether I am being rigid in using the basis of Jay's actual wording or not.

I don't think I'm being unreasonable in asking you to very clearly, very specifically answer what I asked.

Look, as far as I can see the only reason to think that he meant "sham" was that there is no "e" on the end of the way he spelt it, whereas there are plenty of reasons to think that he did indeed mean "shame", so the latter is a more logical conclusion to reach

Take from that what you will.

[Niamh.]

It this some indication here that the view held by youself and MTVN are the only views that are to be accepted on this thread?

Nope, it's an indication that I agree with MTVNs view, is that alright with you?

[Pyramid*]

Look, as far as I can see the only reason to think that he meant "sham" was that there is no "e" on the end of the way he spelt it, whereas there are plenty of reasons to think that he did indeed mean "shame", so the latter is a more logical conclusion to reach

Take from that what you will.

Still not answering specifically what I asked you. I'll take from that what I will... indeed.

Nope, it's an indication that I agree with MTVNs view, is that alright with you?

Absolutely, why would it not be alright with me Niamh? That's what makes the forum exist. Just comes across very much that anyone who doesn't happen to agree with both of your own opinions - that those opposing ones are incorrect and to be disregarded.

Perhaps you could explain why my own view, ie: that Jay meant to use the word 'sham' - cannot be equally regarded as plausible, as it's clear both you and MTVN feel that's simply not an option to be accepted (regardless of whether you are not in agreement).

[jo1791]

Still not answering specifically what I asked you. I'll take from that what I will... indeed.



Absolutely, why would it not be alright with me Niamh? That's what makes the forum exist. Just comes across very much that anyone who doesn't happen to agree with both of your own opinions - that those opposing ones are incorrect and to be disregarded.

Perhaps you could explain why my own view, ie: that Jay meant to use the word 'sham' - cannot be equally regarded as plausible, as it's clear both you and MTVN feel that's simply not an option to be accepted (regardless of whether you are not in agreement).

Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?! :)

[Niamh.]

Still not answering specifically what I asked you. I'll take from that what I will... indeed.



Absolutely, why would it not be alright with me Niamh? That's what makes the forum exist. Just comes across very much that anyone who doesn't happen to agree with both of your own opinions - that those opposing ones are incorrect and to be disregarded.

Perhaps you could explain why my own view, ie: that Jay meant to use the word 'sham' - cannot be equally regarded as plausible, as it's clear both you and MTVN feel that's simply not an option to be accepted (regardless of whether you are not in agreement).

You got all that from a smiley? :joker:

Because I fail to see how not staying in touch is a "sham" that doesn't even make sense. Shame does. Simples.

[Pyramid*]

Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?! :)


Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright

You got all that from a smiley? :joker:

Because I fail to see how not staying in touch is a "sham" that doesn't even make sense. Shame does. Simples.


No.... I got it from the part where you said, rather caustic in tone, Nope, it's an indication that I agree with MTVNs view, is that alright with you?

Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

[Niamh.]

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright




Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

Do you now.

[Pyramid*]

Do you now.

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

[Niamh.]

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

Indeed.

[Pyramid*]

Indeed.

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

[MTVN]

Your opinion was being challenged and scrutinised, it's called debate, you were not being disrespected

[Niamh.]

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

[Pyramid*]

Your opinion was being challenged and scrutinised, it's called debate, you were not being disrespected

I disagree. It was very clear that far from being challenged (far less scrutinised!!) - it was simply being dismissedl, riduculed and regarded as all that you posted earlier. Let's not dwell though.

'sham really' - I agree with Jay 100% in what he tweeted.

[Pyramid*]

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

Eggcellent.

[MTVN]

I disagree. It was very clear that far from being challenged (far less scrutinised!!) - it was simply being dismissedl, riduculed and regarded as all that you posted earlier. Let's not dwell though.

'sham really' - I agree with Jay 100% in what he tweeted.

Can I suggest you don't take things so personally and sensitively in future then :)

[Pyramid*]

Can I suggest you don't take things so personally and sensitively in future then :)


Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then. :)

[Niamh.]

Eggcellent.

:joker:

[fruit_cake]

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol

[Pyramid*]

:joker:

Was gonna put up a cracked up Humpty Dumpty but thought you might take it as though I was insinutating you were a 'very round lady' and didn't want to offend !!

[jo1791]

Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then. :)

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact;)

[Pyramid*]

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given. ;)

I'm not talking about the forum.

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?




If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k


How would you have done that exactly?

none of your business.

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol



I'll let all of the above posts speak for themselves.

I at least have kept to the topic of the the thread and the conversation re the Jay/Alex the money etc.....

[Pyramid*]

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact;)

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether. ;)

[jo1791]

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether. ;)

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face. :)

[fruit_cake]

I'll let all of the above posts speak for themselves.

I at least have kept to the topic of the the thread and the conversation re the Jay/Alex the money etc.....

oh Pyramid, give it a rest.. you always seem to take things the wrong way even when they are meant to be nice to you imo

[Pyramid*]

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face. :)


Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clear evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himself tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible. :)

[MachoPoodle]

Where can I learn the art of advanced smiley-reading as mentioned earlier in this thread? It sounds like a good cash cow to me, and much more modern than crystal balls and tarot and all that old hat stuff. Certified courses only please, otherwise not worth my time.

Oh, and shamE on Alex for keeping all the money!

[Pyramid*]

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol

oh Pyramid, give it a rest.. you always seem to take things the wrong way even when they are meant to be nice to you imo


I must have missed the nicety in all the posts of yours that I quoted just a few minutes ago.

Can you at least try to stick to the topic Fruitcake?

[thesheriff443]

there was a time i thought i was perfect!,
now i dont think that word is good enough for me,

[Pyramid*]

Where can I learn the art of advanced smiley-reading as mentioned earlier in this thread? It sounds like a good cash cow to me, and much more modern than crystal balls and tarot and all that old hat stuff. Certified courses only please, otherwise not worth my time.

Oh, and shamE on Alex for keeping all the money!


You need to actually read the words, and not rely on the smileys.....

Surely your little Merlin wizard chappy in your avatar might have been able to help you !!

I love the BIB. :D

shame indeed but good for her all the same.

[jo1791]

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clearl evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himsef tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible. :)

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...

[Pyramid*]

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...


You most certainly indicated that it was plausible. Moreso, you stated that you would completely understand WHY he'd say that.

I don't believe I have said anyone is wrong to have their opinion, different as it may be to my own.


Originally Posted by jo1791 http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/blue/viewpost.gif (http://thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4784620#post4784620)
Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?! :)

[jo1791]

You most certainly indicated that it was plausible. Moreso, you stated that you would completely understand WHY he'd say that.

Yes I did but I realise that a lot of diciphering is required when reading Jays tweets and 'shame' is the word that makes the most sense. But the whole Alex not spitting the cash is a sham!!!!

[Pyramid*]

Yes I did but I realise that a lot of diciphering is required when reading Jays tweets and 'shame' is the word that makes the most sense. But the whole Alex not spitting the cash is a sham!!!!

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright


Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.:hugesmile:

[Scotty07]

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.:hugesmile:

Personally I couldn't careless whether Jay meant "Shame" or "Sham", but I've really enjoyed reading this thread.:joker::joker::joker: Good for you Pyramid, for sticking to what you believe to be the truth.:thumbs:

[Bill Carson]

Ok fine, you stick to your religious devotion to "facts" and I'll stick to what I consider to be basic logic and common sense :)

It appears sense may not be so common.

[Pyramid*]

It appears sense may not be so common.

Loving your sole contribution here to the thread Bill - posted only to be critical of another member and with a sly dig. I'm so pleased that I (or my sense) are not so common. :hmph:


Good I love this place at times!

:D


Oh, thanks Scotty07, that's a far better sole contribution.... LOL :D! :thumbs:

[jo1791]

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.:hugesmile:

I know what I think thank you muchly:hugesmile:

When a sentence begins....EVEN IF....hypothetical dear :)

[Niamh.]

Was gonna put up a cracked up Humpty Dumpty but thought you might take it as though I was insinutating you were a 'very round lady' and didn't want to offend !!

I know you would never insinuate such things! :shocked:

[Vicky.]

You thought you were right before.....


Gabriellee1996 Gabrielle Bradbeer
@ @RealJayMcKray when in the house, did you shave aaron's head with the same razor you used to shave your ass?


@RealJayMcKray
Jay McKray @Gabriellee1996 yes a did hehe x

Off topic, but that is ****ing disgusting and I didnt think even jay would stoop that low.

Why the hell did BB allow this? :bored:

[jo1791]

Off topic, but that is ****ing disgusting and I didnt think even jay would stoop that low.

Why the hell did BB allow this? :bored:

Why would BB intervene? I very much doubt BB would have been aware of it for starters!!!

[Vicky.]

Why would BB intervene? I very much doubt BB would have been aware of it for starters!!!

Health and safety I would like to think...

[jo1791]

Health and safety I would like to think...

I'm sure they would have done HAD they made note that that last time 'the shaver' had been used was on Jay's nether regions!!!

Do you think they make notes for this sort of thing?

I think not ;)

[Vicky.]

You honestly think they would not have known...wow

[MTVN]

Lets be fair, I'm sure he ran it under the tap first..

[Vicky.]

Lets be fair, I'm sure he ran it under the tap first..

:laugh2:

Lets be fair...that also would not make it better :p

Tbh BB have disgusted me this year with their lack of care for health and safety. They allowed this...yes they DID clean he freezer, I will give them that, but they also watched sweatgate in CBB too :/

[jo1791]

You honestly think they would not have known...wow

I honestly don't think they would have kept tabs on when and how a razer was used, no!

Lets be fair, I'm sure he ran it under the tap first..

Exactly! That goes without saying really...! :)

[jo1791]

:laugh2:

Lets be fair...that also would not make it better :p

Tbh BB have disgusted me this year with their lack of care for health and safety. They allowed this...yes they DID clean he freezer, I will give them that, but they also watched sweatgate in CBB too :/

Did you see the state of the 'accommodation' this year, kitchen area?

That was far more disgusting and more of a 'healthy and safety' concern than a used razor blade being used to trim hair....!

[MTVN]

:laugh2:

Lets be fair...that also would not make it better :p

Tbh BB have disgusted me this year with their lack of care for health and safety. They allowed this...yes they DID clean he freezer, I will give them that, but they also watched sweatgate in CBB too :/

Yeah I don't think they care much for the housemates health & well-being or anything, just whatever will cause the most drama

[Vicky.]

I honestly don't think they would have kept tabs on when and how a razer was used, no!


Of course they will have known, IIRC the ass shaving and haircut were shown on the same day...

I remember half the forum kicking off about him using the same razor, and the other half (myself included) saying he wouldnt be that vile :joker:

Oh how I hate being wrong

[Vicky.]

That said, I may just be being a prude or something...IDK.

I hate seeing people share razors full stop...think its awful and quite dangerous tbh, never mind go from shaving ones ass to shaving someones head :laugh:

[jo1791]

Of course they will have known, IIRC the ass shaving and haircut were shown on the same day...

I remember half the forum kicking off about him using the same razor, and the other half (myself included) saying he wouldnt be that vile :joker:

Oh how I hate being wrong

I don't think even BB will be watching every second of every housemate, it is easy to assume someone has replaced a razor which takes a second, if that.

[Ammi]

That said, I may just be being a prude or something...IDK.

I hate seeing people share razors full stop...think its awful and quite dangerous tbh, never mind go from shaving ones ass to shaving someones head :laugh:

I don't think that's being a prude..what if someone had nicked themselves...you wouldn't share a syringe needle..same thing imo

[jo1791]

That said, I may just be being a prude or something...IDK.

I hate seeing people share razors full stop...think its awful and quite dangerous tbh, never mind go from shaving ones ass to shaving someones head :laugh:

I agree with you and I doubt Aaron would have shared a razor in any other circumstance - it is only hair, hopefully he washed it soon after!!!

[Pyramid*]

Yes you did, and made no mention of the 'shame' making more sense in that particular post....that post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay did mean to type SHAM.

You will find that I also agree with the latter part, as stated in my post above.:hugesmile:

I know what I think thank you muchly:hugesmile:

When a sentence begins....EVEN IF....hypothetical dear :)


Oh I know it was hypothetical, dear. Just as (as I stated earlier -see post above) - that that particular post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay DID mean to type SHAM.


Here is your post again: It's very easy to read. It very clearly stated that you are accepting the possibility - not only do you say that, you go on to say that you would understand why he would.

Originally Posted by jo1791 http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/blue/viewpost.gif (http://thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4784620#post4784620)
Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?! :)


My work here is done methinks: best part is: Jay /Lou are still minus their £1k hopefully. :D

[Pyramid*]

That said, I may just be being a prude or something...IDK.

I hate seeing people share razors full stop...think its awful and quite dangerous tbh, never mind go from shaving ones ass to shaving someones head :laugh:

Oh I think you are far from a prude - if you shaved your arse with a razor - would your partner be happy running it under the tap then using it on his face for example?

It's called basic hygiene, but then, we all learned that Jay showed little regard to such things.

[Vicky.]

Oh I think you are far from a prude - if you shaved your arse with a razor - would your partner be happy running it under the tap then using it on his face for example?

It's called basic hygiene, but then, we all learned that Jay showed little regard to such things.

Heh, I very much doubt it.

[jo1791]

Oh I think you are far from a prude - if you shaved your arse with a razor - would your partner be happy running it under the tap then using it on his face for example?

It's called basic hygiene, but then, we all learned that Jay showed little regard to such things.

It was used on hair fgs!

[jo1791]

Oh I know it was hypothetical, dear. Just as (as I stated earlier -see post above) - that that particular post of yours was specific to the possibility that Jay DID mean to type SHAM.


Here is your post again: It's very easy to read. It very clearly stated that you are accepting the possibility - not only do you say that, you go on to say that you would understand why he would.



My work here is done methinks: best part is: Jay /Lou are still minus their £1k hopefully. :D

Thanks for requoting my post, I am well aware of the reasoning to my posts and don't need you to twist my reasoning. I was merely pointing out that regardless of the word, Jay wasn't bitching, which is what you accused him of...dear;)

I certainly wasn't in agreement with your stance that he meant 'sham' and not 'shame' as it doesn't make sense :)

[Pyramid*]

It was used on hair fgs!

I'm sure that what men is shaved off their face is known as facial hair. In fact I'd go as far as saying I'm 100% sure of that.

Hair is hair - and it's attached to skin.

:joker:

[jo1791]

I'm sure that what men is shaved off their face is known as facial hair. In fact I'd go as far as saying I'm 100% sure of that.

Hair is hair - and it's attached to skin.

:joker:

Aaron doesn't have a skin head, therefore one can easily deduce that the razor wasn't used close to the skin.

[Pyramid*]

Thanks for requoting my post, I am well aware of the reasoning to my posts and don't need you to twist my reasoning. I was merely pointing out that regardless of the word, Jay wasn't bitching, which is what you accused him of...dear;)

I certainly wasn't in agreement with your stance that he meant 'sham' and not 'shame' as it doesn't make sense :)

I didn't have to twist anything. You very clearly wrote what you did. What you meant was very clear to understand - and that was, that you were prepared to consider that Jay may have used the word SHAM deliberately.

Anyhow, now that has been cleared up - I'll bid you a lovely day.....dear.

[Niamh.]

Aaron did watch Jay shaving his arse with it though, maybe he should have made sure it was a different blade? Although, I don't think Jay should have been allowed to use the razor they use for their heads on his arsehole either, just like he shouldn't use the freezer as a toilet :idc:

[MTVN]

Well ass razer or not, he gave Aaron a better haircut than "celebrity hairdresser" Lee Stafford did :idc:

[fruit_cake]

what about Aden's hair wasn't that the same razor

[MTVN]

Did he use it on his own hair as well?

[Pyramid*]

Aaron doesn't have a skin head, therefore one can easily deduce that the razor wasn't used close to the skin.




I can't believe you just typed that! :joker: Because it wasn't a skinhead, it didn't go near his skin! Now that's funny.


Niahm - to be perfectly honest - I genuinely believed that Jay would not have used the same razor - I actually stuck up for Jay at the time as I truly didn't think he'd be so utterly filthy & so disgusting to do that. Seems my momentary lapse in giving Jay some slack was ill judged - and that my original opinion of him all along, was spot on after all. Horrible man.

[Pyramid*]

Well ass razer or not, he gave Aaron a better haircut than "celebrity hairdresser" Lee Stafford did :idc:

:hugesmile:

Now THAT, I'm with you 100%!

[Vicky.]

Well ass razer or not, he gave Aaron a better haircut than "celebrity hairdresser" Lee Stafford did :idc:

Cant argue with that :laugh:

[Jules2]

Loving your sole contribution here to the thread Bill - posted only to be critical of another member and with a sly dig. I'm so pleased that I (or my sense) are not so common. :hmph:


Good I love this place at times!

:D


Oh, thanks Scotty07, that's a far better sole contribution.... LOL :D! :thumbs:

Hi folks, Pyramid I love your cat. I cant find the post which I want to reply to but it refers to the money. Having read the pieces from the twits and putting it into context, I would say that Jay meant shame tbh. Shame is a gentler word than sham and this is how I read it. He was totally out of order re the razor but there again that is the type of bloke he is.

Imo he would be upset about Alex not sharing the money because if Alex doesnt keep her side of the bargain then imo Aaron shouldnt neither. Aaron should have the greater amount as he won . In theory Jay would have done better to offer Aaron the 5, thus leaving Aaron's balance to be claimed from Alex. Louise should then have claimed her balance from Alex. It all rests on Alex if Jay has already shared with Louise. The first part needed to be taken up before the second part was undertaken, thus Jay has now lost out and this is possibly why he would be upset at Alex not sharing. It is said in the magazines that Louise and Jay are upset?

[jo1791]

I didn't have to twist anything. You very clearly wrote what you did. What you meant was very clear to understand - and that was, that you were prepared to consider that Jay may have used the word SHAM deliberately.

Anyhow, now that has been cleared up - I'll bid you a lovely day.....dear.

Do learn to be gracious dear, I know what I meant now run off and accept it ;)

[jo1791]

Hi folks, Pyramid I love your cat. I cant find the post which I want to reply to but it refers to the money. Having read the pieces from the twits and putting it into context, I would say that Jay meant shame tbh. Shame is a gentler word than sham and this is how I read it. He was totally out of order re the razor but there again that is the type of bloke he is.

Imo he would be upset about Alex not sharing the money because if Alex doesnt keep her side of the bargain then imo Aaron shouldnt neither. Aaron should have the greater amount as he won . In theory Jay would have done better to offer Aaron the 5, thus leaving Aaron's balance to be claimed from Alex. Louise should then have claimed her balance from Alex. It all rests on Alex if Jay has already shared with Louise. The first part needed to be taken up before the second part was undertaken, thus Jay has now lost out and this is possibly why he would be upset at Alex not sharing. It is said in the magazines that Louise and Jay are upset?

I disagree, he'd be gambling with Louise's money because there'd be no guarantee that Alex would split still. So he's right to split his with Louise who is his girlfriend. Aaron wouldn't have split the winnings with Jay regardless!!

[Pyramid*]

Do learn to be gracious dear, I know what I meant now run off and accept it ;)

What an utterly patronising and rude post.

I accept that you and I will never agree. That is as much agreement as we will reach.

[jo1791]

What an utterly patronising and rude post.

I accept that you and I will never agree. That is as much agreement as we will reach.

Not as rude and patronising as you dictating to me what I meant in my post...! The cheek of it!! ;)

[Pyramid*]

Not as rude and patronising as you dictating to me what I meant in my post...! The cheek of it!! ;)

I know..the cheek of me reading exactly what you wrote, and understanding it, exactly as you wrote it.

How very dare I !! ;)

[jo1791]

I know..the cheek of me reading exactly what you wrote, and understanding it, exactly as you wrote it.

How very dare I !! ;)

Its amazing how much you don't understand in all honesty, how very dare I point it out ;)

[Pyramid*]

Its amazing how much you don't understand in all honesty, how very dare I point it out ;)
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTt6YNHWq9RAgkrJ8DI6Tco7AvNcQSM7 xKowaGtWTRia5qX2miu

[jo1791]

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTt6YNHWq9RAgkrJ8DI6Tco7AvNcQSM7 xKowaGtWTRia5qX2miu

We are so alike in that way

:eek:

[Pyramid*]

We are so alike in that way

:eek:



http://mystuffspace.com/graphic/prod_597_15973.gif

:D

[jo1791]

http://mystuffspace.com/graphic/prod_597_15973.gif

:D

Hmmmm should I let you have it....

*ponders*

;)

[Pyramid*]

Hmmmm should I let you have it....

*ponders*

;)

don't ponder too much..... some of us have our dinner to eat.

:D