ITV Emerge as Frontrunner to Air Meghan and Harry's Oprah Interview

[Niamh.]

Following a bidding war, British television station ITV has reportedly emerged as the frontrunner to air the tell-all interview given by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to Oprah Winfrey.

Last week Oprah flew to California to complete filming on the hotly anticipated interview, during which the Harry and Meghan will reportedly lift the lid on tensions within the Royal Family, as well as issues including their mental health, their move to the US and their hopes and plans for the future.

Days after filming wrapped, Buckingham Palace confirmed Queen Elizabeth’s decision to strip the Duke and Duchess of Sussex of their remaining titles and patronages, which was based on the belief that ‘it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service’ if the couple continues to pursue commercial interests.

https://i.imgur.com/t0oodJF.jpeg

The CBS interview is due to air in the US on March 7, and it has been reported that ITV seems to have come out on top of the scramble among British media outlets to secure the rights to the 90-minute special.

According to Variety, both Sky and the BBC have withdrawn from the bidding war, as they are set to air a special with Queen Elizabeth mere hours before the Oprah tell-all airs in the US.

It has been reported that the Viacom CBS Global Distribution Group is keen to sell the overseas broadcast rights to a free-to-air station, thereby ruling out subscription-based services such as Amazon Prime and Netflix.

Meghan and Harry have reportedly indicated their preferred broadcaster, another factor tipping ITV, as the Duchess of Sussex previously gave an emotional interview to ITV presenter Tom Bradby.

https://extra.ie/2021/02/25/entertainment/celebrity/itv-frontrunner-air-meghan-harry-oprah-interview

[Oliver_W]

ITV Be would be the most appropriate .

[UserSince2005]

Just when you thought Gemma Collins was the trashiest guest on a ITV primetime talk show.

[Cherie]

The Bradbury connection makes sense

It would have been better without adverts in my view

Obviously ITV can charge the earth to advertisers in those slots

[joeysteele]

Nice one.

[rusticgal]

[QUOTE=Cherie;11006845]

It would have been better without adverts in my view


...gives us time to empty the sick bucket :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Let's face it

Its a financial based friend interviewing another financial based friend

Its fake, a set-up. Its not Andrew Neil or Paxman asking uncomfortable questions, its not even on a par with a Jonathon Ross interview or Life stories

It has no journalistic integrity. Its an advertorial - like the paid for promotions you see in magazines where "the client" writes the copy and they love it but its totally unreadable for the actual reader.

"Why do you care sooo much about babies and puppies Meghan?"

"Can you be any more philanthropic?"

"you were hounded out of the UK by a few relatively negative articles in like 3newspapers you don't read, have you found happiness in your 20 million dollar far too big house in LA??"

"Can we talk about all your money grabbing..i mean making projects?"


If you want to watch that i just cant imagine why anyone would - its like recording a series and just watching the ad-breaks:joker:

[Beso]

Hallelujah.....


At least we get an ad break

[Beso]

[QUOTE=Cherie;11006845]

It would have been better without adverts in my view


...gives us time to empty the sick bucket :laugh:

Yes.. :joker:

This one.:hee:

[GoldHeart]

[QUOTE=Cherie;11006845]

It would have been better without adverts in my view


...gives us time to empty the sick bucket :laugh:

If you think it will make you PHYSICALLY SICK then why are you going to watch it ?? , melodramatic much :whistle:

[Tom4784]

People who hate Meghan will be first in line to watch the interview. I for one can't be arsed with it, if anything interesting happens, I'm sure someone on here will rush to make a topic.

[arista]

People who hate Meghan will be first in line to watch the interview. I for one can't be arsed with it, if anything interesting happens, I'm sure someone on here will rush to make a topic.


No keep it all on this one thread
would be better

[Cherie]

I will definitely watch, it’s a free country

And ‘gasps’ make a thread too if I feel like it

[Ammi]

...it’s due to be aired on the 8th March here and still ITV as the channel it will be shown on...but I’m sure there’ll be media stories and bits of the interview etc to be seen after it airs in the USA the previous evening, which is annoying because we’ll get out of context clips and then the whole thing...I’m presuming it’ll be showed in full and not edited highlights...

[joeysteele]

...it’s due to be aired on the 8th March here and still ITV as the channel it will be shown on...but I’m sure there’ll be media stories and bits of the interview etc to be seen after it airs in the USA the previous evening, which is annoying because we’ll get out of context clips and then the whole thing...I’m presuming it’ll be showed in full and not edited highlights...

I'll be watching it.
Really more to get the correct story of what they say, from their own mouths, and not what those against them portray as what they twist as to what they said or meant.

I wish them well, I was indifferent to them.
However I hate unnecessary character assassination of anyone, especially someone another doesn't really know and never will.

Unless they break laws or really impact on our lives, I see no likely rational reasoning behind that.
So I will watch it now.

I would guess, a great bulk of the viewers will be those who just want to nitpick on every little thing she says, possibly even on how she sits or even facial expressions too.

If I intensely disliked someone or some celebrity, I just would give a wide berth to them.
I'm neither interested in what a celebrity I didn't like was saying or doing.
So would never sit down in my own home and watch them, or listen to them.

As you said, there'll be out of context snippets of it.

There'll be outrage, if anything is remotely said that indicates a dig at the Queen.
From possibly people, not on here, who aren't even bothered if we kept a Monarchy or not and maybe even would vote to abolish it.

The Palace doesn't get things right all the time, the Queen and the Palace got the public mood desperately wrong re Diana after her death.

Respect is a 2 way thing, whether that's to or from the Monarchy and the Palace in my view.

I think the Royal full working duty set up as it still remains, is a very cold, uncompromising and robotic existence.
Anyway, normally I wouldn't have likely watched this.
However will now.
Not to nitpick at it, just to get the words from their own mouths and not from those who'd choose to twist everything they say and do, to only a negative.

No one, I don't care who they are, are wrong all the time, or right all the time either.

[Janet Jackson]

The people who hate them deserve to be wound up even more so I hope it’s ugly. They really
can go about their life but they choose to immerse themselves in it and have someone to hate.

[arista]

Yes ITV1HD monday.

[Crimson Dynamo]

i could not think of anything worse than watching a stage-managed, scripted 2 hour PR advert. the interviewer being a friend :joker: as if anything said will be real.

i am sure most people will watch for a laugh more than anything else

[arista]

[ITV1HD will show Oprah with Meghan and Harry:
A Primetime Special at 8pm UK time on Monday March 8]


[Some ITV viewers have already vowed to boycott
the show while advertisers may also be put off by furore]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9315659/ITV-air-bombshell-Oprah-Winfrey-interview-Harry-Meghan-Monday.html

[Toy Soldier]

If you want to watch that i just cant imagine why anyone would - its like recording a series and just watching the ad-breaks:joker:

Because if you don't watch it, you can't comment on it. You'll be sorely missed on the inevitable thread LT. I reckon you'll begrudgingly watch it, though.

I also recommend the Harry & James Corden thing, it's on youtube. Honestly quite painful to watch... really uncomfortable... totally compelling. There's rope climbing and all sorts. But Harry actually comes across well in the end. I think maybe that's the tactic... if you put anyone next to James Corden, they end up looking amazing because of the juxtaposition.

[Cherie]

I will watch it but only if after I see the reaction from the US airing, and when I can fast forward through the ads breaks of which there will be many

[arista]

Following a bidding war, British television station ITV has reportedly emerged as the frontrunner to air the tell-all interview given by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to Oprah Winfrey.

Last week Oprah flew to California to complete filming on the hotly anticipated interview, during which the Harry and Meghan will reportedly lift the lid on tensions within the Royal Family, as well as issues including their mental health, their move to the US and their hopes and plans for the future.

Days after filming wrapped, Buckingham Palace confirmed Queen Elizabeth’s decision to strip the Duke and Duchess of Sussex of their remaining titles and patronages, which was based on the belief that ‘it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service’ if the couple continues to pursue commercial interests.

https://i.imgur.com/t0oodJF.jpeg

The CBS interview is due to air in the US on March 7, and it has been reported that ITV seems to have come out on top of the scramble among British media outlets to secure the rights to the 90-minute special.

According to Variety, both Sky and the BBC have withdrawn from the bidding war, as they are set to air a special with Queen Elizabeth mere hours before the Oprah tell-all airs in the US.

It has been reported that the Viacom CBS Global Distribution Group is keen to sell the overseas broadcast rights to a free-to-air station, thereby ruling out subscription-based services such as Amazon Prime and Netflix.

Meghan and Harry have reportedly indicated their preferred broadcaster, another factor tipping ITV, as the Duchess of Sussex previously gave an emotional interview to ITV presenter Tom Bradby.

https://extra.ie/2021/02/25/entertainment/celebrity/itv-frontrunner-air-meghan-harry-oprah-interview


If Possible could edit your title to something like this:
ITV1HD 9PM "Meghan & Harry's with Oprah" Mon. 8th

Then we can post comments on your thread.

[jet]

i could not think of anything worse than watching a stage-managed, scripted 2 hour PR advert. the interviewer being a friend :joker: as if anything said will be real.

i am sure most people will watch for a laugh more than anything else

I'll record and watch bits at a time - 2 hours of those 2 non stop? NO!
Some say "If you don't like them, why watch"?
Well, the simple answer is they are a fascinating study in egomania.

A pandemic, millions dead worldwide, families grieving and so many struggling, many people who don’t have the elite privileges that these 2 have - the money, servants, nanny’s, 3 million dollar house, multi million dollar deals - are meanwhile struggling with their mental health but can't bleat about it in a grossly self indulgent tv 'special'.

Meanwhile Harry happily larks around on a bus and he and Meghan (wearing a $4,700 dress) are doing that 2 hour special with plenty of poor us and victimhood and ‘our mental health' thrown in. And no doubt they'll talk about their compassion and how they want to live a life of service - more empty words like we've had before. Unbelievable.

[Kazanne]

I'll record and watch bits at a time - 2 hours of those 2 non stop? NO!
Some say "If you don't like them, why watch"?
Well, the simple answer is they are a fascinating study in egomania.

A pandemic, millions dead worldwide, families grieving and so many struggling, many people who don’t have the elite privileges that these 2 have - the money, servants, nanny’s, 3 million dollar house, multi million dollar deals - are meanwhile struggling with their mental health but can't bleat about it in a grossly self indulgent tv 'special'.

Meanwhile Harry happily larks around on a bus and he and Meghan (wearing a $4,700 dress) are doing that 2 hour special with plenty of poor us and victimhood and ‘our mental health' thrown in. And no doubt they'll talk about their compassion and how they want to live a life of service - more empty words like we've had before. Unbelievable.

Also if you want to discuss things about the interview you need to watch to be able to debate things

[bots]

it's going to have to be brimming with controversy and new information before i will watch it, so i will look to others to let me know if it meets those criteria or not :laugh:

[arista]

1367096287896743938

[rusticgal]

I'll record and watch bits at a time - 2 hours of those 2 non stop? NO!
Some say "If you don't like them, why watch"?
Well, the simple answer is they are a fascinating study in egomania.

A pandemic, millions dead worldwide, families grieving and so many struggling, many people who don’t have the elite privileges that these 2 have - the money, servants, nanny’s, 3 million dollar house, multi million dollar deals - are meanwhile struggling with their mental health but can't bleat about it in a grossly self indulgent tv 'special'.

Meanwhile Harry happily larks around on a bus and he and Meghan (wearing a $4,700 dress) are doing that 2 hour special with plenty of poor us and victimhood and ‘our mental health' thrown in. And no doubt they'll talk about their compassion and how they want to live a life of service - more empty words like we've had before. Unbelievable.


Fantastic summary...as always.

[Cherie]

it's going to have to be brimming with controversy and new information before i will watch it, so i will look to others to let me know if it meets those criteria or not :laugh:

same, I haven't bothered with Harry on the bus, I don't care if Philip closes his laptop to say goodbye :laugh:

[Cherie]

1367096287896743938

Nooooo I love Unforgotton!

[bots]

Nooooo I love Unforgotton!

it seems to have been forgotten on Monday :laugh:

[arista]

Nooooo I love Unforgotton!


Tuesday 9PM


They paid a Million pounds
for that CBS 2 hour
so Monday mega day for Ads
9PM.

[bots]

i heard all the ads on Monday night were going to be sponsored by the daily mail :laugh:

[arista]

1367084130077446150

[arista]

1367455337977118720

[Tom4784]

I will probably read a summary of it from BBC, or something, at most. **** watching a two hour interview.

[Crimson Dynamo]

WvZYxMCbvEY

[Tom4784]

Oh look, Meghan's number 1 fan, Piers Morgan, is talking about her again.

[Ammi]

...when Piers refers to ‘respect’ or ‘consideration’ in any way and about any other person....he may think about not cutting into Susanna so much and so often whenever she tries to use her voice as well and feeling his voice has more more importance to be heard when he speaks.../...or ranted, to be more accurate...

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/15759/production/_117479878_times-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/124F5/production/_117479947_mail-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/22C1/production/_117479880_mirror-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/49D1/production/_117479881_star-nc.png

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/06/21/40126730-0-image-a-10_1615067296038.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/06/22/40126734-9334081-image-a-2_1615069306481.jpg

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/07/00/40101066-9334081-The_Queen_pictured_with_the_Sussexes_in_2018_has_n ot_been_given_-a-1_1615077473437.jpg
2018

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9334081/Buckingham-Palace-officials-withering-dismissal-Harry-Meghans-Oprah-interview.html

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/06/22/40129270-9334081-image-a-6_1615069456186.jpg


Could be the last time
Meghan gets close to the Queen.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Neem maybe you could change the title to

The Meghan and Harry Oprah interview thread

Then it will be easier to find when you need to close it and clean it


:hee:

[AnnieK]

Neem maybe you could change the title to

The Meghan and Harry Oprah interview thread

Then it will be easier to find when you need to close it and clean it


:hee:

:laugh:

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/10CA0/production/_117486786_express-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/133B0/production/_117486787_mail-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/15AC0/production/_117486788_mirror-nc.png

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/181D0/production/_117486789_star-nc.png

[Beso]

:joker:

[Alf]

The people in America have already watched it and are talking about it on twitter.

Does anybody want any spoilers?

[arista]

1368630388596166658

[Alf]

She praises Her Majesty, but bitches about Kate. She says that Kate made her cry before her wedding

[arista]

she praises her majesty, but bitches about kate. She says that kate made her cry before her wedding


1368738975939256330

[Glenn.]

There were concerns about how dark the baby would be. Shocking

[arista]

1368738768832888834

[Jordan.]

There were concerns about how dark the baby would be. Shocking

Repulsive. I'm guessing it was a member of the immediate family given that she wouldn't name who.

[arista]

there were concerns about how dark the baby would be. Shocking


1368739895351541762

[Jordan.]

so she was suicidal and was told it wouldn't "look good" for her to get help...

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ev6_PMjWQAI23lF?format=jpg&name=small

[Glenn.]

Seems they didn’t learn from their mistakes. Literally history was repeating itself like with Diana.

[arista]

so she was suicidal and was told it wouldn't "look good" for her to get help...



Yes Thats
the trouble with her

[arista]

1368742590007439366

[arista]

1368741166213193734


Under an hour still to go
SkyNewsHD reports live from LA.

[arista]

1368744556183904265

[arista]

1368715873301786627


Milk it all you like

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/08/01/40184258-0-image-m-21_1615167037520.jpg

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ev6zyHaXYAEmP9g?format=jpg&name=small

ITV's Chris Ships Feed

[Glenn.]

Harry and Megs just spilling piping hot tea

[arista]

1368273605012914177

[arista]

1367828301142777858

[Glenn.]

Bottom line is they didn’t receive any help from the Royal Family when they were desperate for it so took the decision to walk away.

Royal family are far more monstrous than I think anyone knows.

[Alf]

Harry said he was cut off financially and had to survive on the money his late mother left him (£10m) the poor soul

[Alf]

No questions asked to her about her father or the Prince Andrew scandal. Very poor Oprah.

[Glenn.]

I think they discussed enough scummy family members

[Tom4784]

I've read the writeup on BBC news, I dunno if it's still ongoing but it's a lot more than I thought it was going to be.

Honestly, abolish the monarchy, it's time has passed, it sounds like Stockholm Syndrome is drilled into the royals from a young age and issues of mental health seem rampant. The whole system is a relic and should be consigned to the pages of history.

[Brother Leon]

Glad she got a sly dig out at Future Queen Kate too.

[Glenn.]

Imagine the shock that it was bully Kate that made Meghan cry.

[Tom4784]

It's also provided another example of the difference of coverage between Kate and Meghan. Kate eating avocados was seen as a method of dealing with the ills of pregnancy, but with Meghan, the newspapers mentioned how avacados were leading to deforestation.

[Glenn.]

They also weren’t asked to take the traditional picture of the new baby either. Meghan just shutting down all of the haters and warped sense of entitlement that people had/have for them and their children :clap1:

[Alf]

Apparently she also said that they got married 3 days before the official wedding.

[Alf]

1368765878582476802

[Alf]

1368766417286365188

[Alf]

1368760153852571648

[bots]

the 2 words that come to my mind are mountain and molehill

[Amy Jade]

the craziness of Meghan being suicidal and being refused help because it wouldn't 'look good' is so disgusting.

[Crimson Dynamo]

well that was a damp squib

but then money-making schemes often are

:skull:

[bots]

Someone in the family is a racist .... shocker ... Prince Philip has never said a word out of turn in that respect over the years

Prince Charles is an uncaring SoB .... another big shocker given all the love and care he showed toward Diana over the years

[Ammi]

the craziness of Meghan being suicidal and being refused help because it wouldn't 'look good' is so disgusting.

...stiff upper Royal etc...when representing the family...

[Cherie]

Makes you wonder why they have clung onto their Titles if it was THAT bad, surely you would walk away and want nothing more to do with any of them

and Harry wants to heal the rift, did I hear that right :joker:

[Cherie]

and come on Harry spit it out, who mentioned Archies skin colour...

[Ammi]

...we should all do a Zoom, gogglebox style while we’re watching...:laugh:...

[Cherie]

Someone in the family is a racist .... shocker ... Prince Philip has never said a word out of turn in that respect over the years

Prince Charles is an uncaring SoB .... another big shocker given all the love and care he showed toward Diana over the years

Yes big news indeed :hehe:

[Cherie]

...we should all do a Zoom, gogglebox style while we’re watching...:laugh:...

aw that would be brilliant

[bots]

diana, the future queen of england, was self harming and had an eating disorder .... and all she got from the family was scorn. This has all been known for so long and on public record. Harry has lived within the family for over 30 years. To say any of this was unexpected or a shock is simply untrue. The royals are not nice people, they never have been

[Ammi]

aw that would be brilliant


...we’re going to try to do that with a few family and friends..it’s our big night out so far this year...:laugh:...

[Ammi]

diana, the future queen of england, was self harming and had an eating disorder .... and all she got from the family was scorn. This has all been known for so long and on public record. Harry has lived within the family for over 30 years. To say any of this was unexpected or a shock is simply untrue. The royals are not nice people, they never have been

...I just can’t understand why ‘the royal way/tradition’ etc would be something to be seen as having as a positive to continue...this has all really made me reconsider the royal family..and at the very least, a stripping back, maybe...

[Cherie]

1368760153852571648

yes 100% they have to man up now and actually name names, but maybe that is for interview 2?

[thesheriff443]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

[Crimson Dynamo]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

id imagine she, as most people have, when angry or upset thought about the reaction of others if she died - its a kind of narcissistic wholly human thought.

and of course, she played the race card as we all knew she would in a vague and not at all be able to be verified way

[Smithy]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

This is disgusting

It’s posts like this that cause real damage to people with mental health conditions

If Caroline flack hadn’t ****ing hung herself and got through her ordeal and talked about it would you have said the same?

[Kazanne]

I will leave my views until I have seen for myself the interview, I am not jumping on any bandwagon and we are only hearing one side at the minute, and yes they should be able to give their side and things should be investigated as should the bullying claims ,fairness on all sides imo. None of us know what went on and I'm not going to fawn over anyone just because I prefer them ,I will sit back and watch and wait.

[Jordan.]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

Only Meghan was suicidal, at least learn the facts before making such a gross comment. There is no "look" for people suffering with their mental health.

[Denver]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

There are 2 different things being in feeling suicidal and committing suicide and that is having a support network.

You can't attack someone for being able to get help when they are at their lowest not everyone has that luxury

[joeysteele]

...I just can’t understand why ‘the royal way/tradition’ etc would be something to be seen as having as a positive to continue...this has all really made me reconsider the royal family..and at the very least, a stripping back, maybe...

Yes, I will always be a Monarchist.
However as I've said this Queen has had 70 years almost to really open up so much as to the Royal set up.
Yet seems to have just strengthened the mystery and robotic rigidity of it.
Maybe even in worse ways.

I'm not going to comment on this interview from the snippets presented in the media.
I've decided, I'll watch it in its entirety, to get the full context of how and what is said.
By both of them.

Like you however, I do feel the royal set up of Royal duty in it's straitjacketed enforcement.
Is way too archaic and way out of touch in the modern world.
Nothing will change under this Monarch.
However it's possible, this rift, desperately sad as it is.
May be the massive kick up the backside and shake up, this old guard of the royal set up needed to start real and correct reform of the whole sorry mess it is.
As to being the cold, authorative and possessive like institution it seems to still be.
Here in the 21st century now, for goodness sake

[Denver]

Them not naming names paints the whole family in a bad light when they should have just come out and said Charles is the one who orchestrated this whole situation

[Cherie]

I also wonder why they want Archie to be a Prince :shrug: surely they would want to keep him away from all things Princely

[Denver]

Glad she got a sly dig out at Future Queen Kate too.

Tbh it wasn't really a dig she said Kate got angry then felt bad and apologised and didn't say a bad word about her apart from that incident.

She forgave Kate because she knows people can overreact at times and Kate was the one who made the apology and tried to make things better with Megan openly said she would have done the same in that situation

[Cherie]

We really need a Jeremy Kyle spoof of this, with Kate coming from off camera and being held back by security :laugh:

[arista]

1368766417286365188


Yes Luck for Harry

[Ammi]

We really need a Jeremy Kyle spoof of this, with Kate coming from off camera and being held back by security :laugh:

...we’ve already had that, I think...

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/Meghan-Markle-news-1094637.jpg?r=1551572216892

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/Meghan-Markle-1763019.jpg?r=1551572216975

[thesheriff443]

This is disgusting

It’s posts like this that cause real damage to people with mental health conditions

If Caroline flack hadn’t ****ing hung herself and got through her ordeal and talked about it would you have said the same?

Go back to your Meghan fan page because you don’t know what you are talking about.

It’s my i opinion if you don’t like it tough luck .

[Josy]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.Horrible comment.

This is the sort of selective #bekind rubbish that makes a mockery of the whole thing, you dont get to pick and choose who should be supported when they open up about mental health issues, there should be no stigma attached to it at all. So that's both Harry and Meghan spoke up about mental health suffering in the last few weeks and then been ripped apart for it both on here and on other platforms. Absolutely sickening.

[Crimson Dynamo]

imagine saying all this in public about your new in-laws

makes you now see her relationship with her poor father, her sister, her best pal and her former husband in a new very bright light

[Cherie]

...we’ve already had that, I think...

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/Meghan-Markle-news-1094637.jpg?r=1551572216892

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/Meghan-Markle-1763019.jpg?r=1551572216975

:joker:

all we need now is Charles and Camilla being followed by Jeremy asking awkward questions

[Josy]

imagine saying all this in public about your new in-laws

makes you now see her relationship with her poor father, her sister, her best pal and her former husband in a new very bright lightYes how dare anyone have the audacity to speak out about racial issues, mental health problems being brushed under the carpet and so on if it makes her in laws look bad. How very dare she.

Even though her husband is right there beside her in full support of her she should just be a good little wife, shut the hell up and keep quiet about it all right?

Happy International Womens Day indeed.

[UserSince2005]

ITV should be ashamed of themselves to air this trash.

It makes Love Island look like Downton Abbey.

[AnnieK]

It sounds very much like she is purging her life of negative influences who have impacted her mental health. The Palace have a poor record on dealing with issues surrounding mental health as was highlighted by Diana.

[Cherie]

Yes how dare anyone have the audacity to speak out about racial issues, mental health problems being brushed under the carpet and so on if it makes her in laws look bad. How very dare she.

Even though her husband is right there beside her in full support of her she should just be a good little wife, shut the hell up and keep quiet about it all right?

Happy International Womens Day indeed.

Harry brought her into it all, he should steered clear from the off :shrug:

I haven't seen the programme but he says he wants to heal the rift? how is that possible now?

[Smithy]

Go back to your Meghan fan page because you don’t know what you are talking about.

It’s my i opinion if you don’t like it tough luck .

Only Meghan was suicidal, at least learn the facts before making such a gross comment. There is no "look" for people suffering with their mental health.

There are 2 different things being in feeling suicidal and committing suicide and that is having a support network.

You can't attack someone for being able to get help when they are at their lowest not everyone has that luxury

Horrible comment.

This is the sort of selective #bekind rubbish that makes a mockery of the whole thing, you dont get to pick and choose who should be supported when they open up about mental health issues, there should be no stigma attached to it at all. So that's both Harry and Meghan spoke up about mental health suffering in the last few weeks and then been ripped apart for it both on here and on other platforms. Absolutely sickening.

Think you’ll find numerous people agree with me :wavey:

[Smithy]

Harry brought her into it all, he should steered clear from the off :shrug:

I haven't seen the programme but he says he wants to heal the rift? how is that possible now?

Harry shouldn’t have be happy because his family a monsters?

That’s a (stupid) new take on it I guess

[Cherie]

Harry shouldn’t have be happy because his family a monsters?

That’s a (stupid) new take on it I guess

wow how did you get that from my post, I am not even going to engage with this gaslighting

[Glenn.]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

What a repulsive thing to say.

[Cherie]

I also don't get the Meghan/Diana comparisons

Diana was a 18 year old child with no life experience whose husband was having an affair from the off

Meghan was a mid 30s woman with life experience and a supportive loving husband

Two completely different scenarios.

[AnnieK]

I also don't get the Meghan/Diana comparisons

Diana was a 18 year old child with no life experience whose husband was having an affair from the off

Meghan was a mid 30s woman with life experience and a supportive loving husband

Two completely different scenarios.

The comparison is both had problems with mental health and were not supported or helped by the Palace. It's the same thing :shrug: Age doesn't really come into play with mental health, you can develop problems at any time.

[Cherie]

The comparison is both had problems with mental health and were not supported or helped by the Palace. It's the same thing :shrug: Age doesn't really come into play with mental health, you can develop problems at any time.

It was different in that she has her husbands support though? so she was not struggling along by herself

[joeysteele]

Harry shouldn’t have be happy because his family a monsters?

That’s a (stupid) new take on it I guess

Exactly.
Who you fall in love with and want to share your life with is all that should matter.

They gave it a shot to be part of the Royal set up.
A rigid cold set up, which has seen 3 of the Queen's childrens marriages end in divorces.

They found nothing really changed even decades after his own Mother's tragedy.
How this is only Prince Harry's or Meghan's fault is beyond me.

As I said I'll wait to see the whole context of all they say in this interview.
However how it's Prince Harry's fault for him falling in love with her and her him.
Is beyond me completely.

I guess anything to possibly just hammer only them on though is par for the course.

[Josy]

Harry brought her into it all, he should steered clear from the off :shrug:



I haven't seen the programme but he says he wants to heal the rift? how is that possible now?I don't understand the first point you made really tbh, Harry shouldn't have married the person he loved due to who he is or who is family is?

It doesnt even come across as if theres as big a rift as the media would have people believe, I mean Harry has already mentioned that both he and Meghan speak to his grandparents almost daily.

[Cherie]

I don't understand the first point you made really tbh, Harry shouldn't have married the person he loved due to who he is or who is family is?

It doesnt even come across as if theres as big a rift as the media would have people believe, I mean Harry has already mentioned that both he and Meghan speak to his grandparents almost daily.

No I meant he should have steered clear of bringing her into that environment :facepalm:

and I meant the rift with Charles and William

[Crimson Dynamo]

Everyone at some point in their lives suffers from mental health issues I think we can all agree about that and I am sure this laundering of dirty washing for profit will have a detrimental effect on the Queen's

sadly

[AnnieK]

It was different in that she has her husbands support though? so she was not struggling along by herself

I guess though when you are struggling it doesn't matter. Look at the number of people who have took their own lives many had loving families but felt they couldn't cope. Thankfully, I've never been in that dark of a place but people who seemingly have everything feel they have very little when they are having MH problems.. It does sound like Harry helped her through it.

[Josy]

No I meant he should have steered clear of bringing her into that environment :facepalm:



and I meant the rift with Charles and WilliamHow would that even be possible to avoid though Cherie?

[Glenn.]

No I meant he should have steered clear of bringing her into that environment :facepalm:

and I meant the rift with Charles and William

The Royal Family was that environment.

[Cherie]

How would that even be possible to avoid though Cherie?

where is he now Josy? they could have walked away from the off, they weren't prisoners

[Mitchell]

Yes how dare anyone have the audacity to speak out about racial issues, mental health problems being brushed under the carpet and so on if it makes her in laws look bad. How very dare she.

Even though her husband is right there beside her in full support of her she should just be a good little wife, shut the hell up and keep quiet about it all right?

Happy International Womens Day indeed.

:clap1:

[Smithy]

No I meant he should have steered clear of bringing her into that environment :facepalm:

and I meant the rift with Charles and William

Harry didn’t know how his family were going to treat her :skull:

What are these ridiculous suggestions you’re making

[Josy]

where is he now Josy? they could have walked away from the off, they weren't prisonersHe probably wanted things to work though more than likely to stop any problems/rifts with his family, it's the treatment of his wife from both his family and media (that also reminded him of his mother being treated the same way) as well as his own mental health suffering due to it that finally made him walk away.

[Glenn.]

where is he now Josy? they could have walked away from the off, they weren't prisoners

They left after realising they would not get help after asking for it. They had no intention of leaving the family and had they received the help they needed they would still be working royals.

It’s not something that can be decided on a whim Cherie, surely you know that. He was a senior royal, he couldn’t just walk away from the off.

[Mitchell]

It’s such a shame really, Harry and Meghan were the role models that the royal family really needed, I’ve always been of the opinion that whilst I don’t actively adore the royal family, I liked them and what they brought to the country, that is no more, and they’re going to find a lot of other people in the same position.

[Denver]

It’s such a shame really, Harry and Meghan were the role models that the royal family really needed, I’ve always been of the opinion that whilst I don’t actively adore the royal family, I liked them and what they brought to the country, that is no more, and they’re going to find a lot of other people in the same position.

I only cared about the Queen and Beatrice and Eugenie and that wont change couldn't care about the others and the Queen needs to sort some deal out that would see Beatrice and Eugenie become joint Queens when she passes

[Cherie]

I doubt I am going to watch it, its all out there now, so little point wasting 2 hours of my life!

[Crimson Dynamo]

It’s such a shame really, Harry and Meghan were the role models that the royal family really needed, I’ve always been of the opinion that whilst I don’t actively adore the royal family, I liked them and what they brought to the country, that is no more, and they’re going to find a lot of other people in the same position.

We already have Kate and Wills and their family

and once Lady Megbeth realised she was way down the pecking order she ran away and played her various pity cards

[LukeB]

Yes how dare anyone have the audacity to speak out about racial issues, mental health problems being brushed under the carpet and so on if it makes her in laws look bad. How very dare she.

Even though her husband is right there beside her in full support of her she should just be a good little wife, shut the hell up and keep quiet about it all right?

Happy International Womens Day indeed.

:clap1:

[Ammi]

...struggling mental health for the younger royals...Harry, Meghan and William as well has spoken about it...has obviously been a huge thing, I would say...and when Meghan said in South Africa that she was struggling and was very open about it, in almost a ‘cry for help’, type way...it was said that it wasn’t the right time, right place etc...but a time and a place isn’t a chosen thing, that emotion from her would have just surfaced and maybe even surfaced because of the time and place etc...that could have very much been a possibility also...but it seems anyway that there wasn’t going to be a right time or place...you’re a royal now, Meghan...we don’t do that, just buckle up and hush up please..etc...

[rusticgal]

I also wonder why they want Archie to be a Prince :shrug: surely they would want to keep him away from all things Princely


They want to lead a normal life but they want the titles...:laugh:

[rusticgal]

No questions asked to her about her father or the Prince Andrew scandal. Very poor Oprah.



It shouldnt surprise you its one-sided...best buddy n all that.

[Mitchell]

We already have Kate and Wills and their family

and once Lady Megbeth realised she was way down the pecking order she ran away and played her various pity cards

I said role models, not puppets.

[rusticgal]

There were concerns about how dark the baby would be. Shocking


No concerns...just a question. I dare say they questioned whether the baby would have ginger hair too...whats the problem.
Two women of colour on the radio this morning saying its a natural discussion when your husband is white...nothing offensive about it at all.

[bots]

Harry didn’t know how his family were going to treat her :skull:

What are these ridiculous suggestions you’re making

i just don't think that is true. The public knew how the family treated diana, harry lived it, i just don't see how he would not have known exactly how the family would behave.

[Glenn.]

No concerns...just a question. I dare say they questioned whether the baby would have ginger hair too...whats the problem.
Two women of colour on the radio this morning saying its a natural discussion when your husband is white...nothing offensive about it at all.

It’s definitely offensive

[Beso]

Harry said he was cut off financially and had to survive on the money his late mother left him (£10m) the poor soul



She will have burned her way through that by now

[rusticgal]

Harry said he was cut off financially and had to survive on the money his late mother left him (£10m) the poor soul


I know....outrageous. They had Meghans fortune too of course. Dont know how they sleep at night.

[AnnieK]

No concerns...just a question. I dare say they questioned whether the baby would have ginger hair too...whats the problem.
Two women of colour on the radio this morning saying its a natural discussion when your husband is white...nothing offensive about it at all.

It's all about context and tone though so we will never know if it was a question or a concern. It could quite easily have been a general musing but it could just have easily had far more sinister reasoning behind it. It obviously caused offence to Harry and Meghan though....however it was meant to be.

[Glenn.]

I find it incredibly worrying that even though this interview is out now and theyve spoken their truth about what happened and how it happened, and let’s be honest, we know it’s true, they wouldn’t have said it if it wasn’t, there are still people still blinded by their dislike for them that they’re pulling them apart for it.

[joeysteele]

It’s definitely offensive

Undeniably 100% grossly offensive it is Glenn.

It may be easy for those not of a different colour to say it's not..
Living it is very different.

[Smithy]

i just don't think that is true. The public knew how the family treated diana, harry lived it, i just don't see how he would not have known exactly how the family would behave.

Because they hadn’t treated Kate like that? Because presumably they hadn’t treated any of Harry’s other (serious) partners like that?

[rusticgal]

It’s definitely offensive


What...questioning the possible tone of a childs skin born to a mixed race couple?...the 2 women this morning couldnt believe she was insinuating racism with such comments.

[Glenn.]

What...questioning the possible tone of a childs skin born to a mixed race couple?...the 2 women this morning couldnt believe she was insinuating racism with such comments.

Why is it even a question?

[Smithy]

What...questioning the possible tone of a childs skin born to a mixed race couple?...the 2 women this morning couldnt believe she was insinuating racism with such comments.

And what that would mean or look like for the royal family

[Cherie]

It's a one sided account, looks like all the Meg fans would go to court and have only one side of the case heard?

and this mention of being in touch with the Queen every day, they chapped back with a response to losing their patronages in a very snippy way, could they not have told her directly.,..

[LukeB]

A white woman telling us it’s not offensive :joker:

[AnnieK]

What...questioning the possible tone of a childs skin born to a mixed race couple?...the 2 women this morning couldnt believe she was insinuating racism with such comments.

But just because those 2 women didn't find it offensive, doesn't mean that others wouldn't. Perception is different for everyone. Again, we don't know how is was mentioned or commented on.

[jet]

where is he now Josy? they could have walked away from the off, they weren't prisoners

Hmm, yes. They were offered a post in Africa for 3 years after the marriage by the Queen, working for charity and as commonwealth ambassadors. They didn't take it.
It all couldn't have been that bad, or they would have been off in a flash. :smug:

[Smithy]

It's a one sided account, looks like all the Meg fans would go to court and have only one side of the case heard?

and this mention of being in touch with the Queen every day, they chapped back with a response to losing their patronages in a very snippy way, could they not have told her directly.,..

For someone that doesn’t want to watch the interview and waste two hours of their lives, you seem pretty intent on discussing it :conf:

[rusticgal]

I find it incredibly worrying that even though this interview is out now and theyve spoken their truth about what happened and how it happened, and let’s be honest, we know it’s true, they wouldn’t have said it if it wasn’t, there are still people still blinded by their dislike for them that they’re pulling them apart for it.


Well if they said it it must be true...
Just like The Duchess denied any input into Finding Freedom...when she did.

[Beso]

The need for her to have 2 wedding ceremonies says it all really.

[Glenn.]

Also it wasn’t just a question it was a ‘concern’

[Glenn.]

Well if they said it it must be true...
Just like The Duchess denied any input into Finding Freedom...when she did.

I don’t see any reason for her to lie about it. It’s her son she’s talking about. But you do you and ignore the facts.

[AnnieK]

It's a one sided account, looks like all the Meg fans would go to court and have only one side of the case heard?

and this mention of being in touch with the Queen every day, they chapped back with a response to losing their patronages in a very snippy way, could they not have told her directly.,..

You could say the same of Meghan detractors though. :shrug: she's lying and playing the victim whatever she says is the general consensus.

This interview was never going to change anyone's opinion of them. I'm bored of it already :laugh:

Its quite telling though if the story is true about the Kate / Meghan incident. I assume if Kate sent a note, that could be produced to prove it but for the Royals to have allowed the press to run with that story since the wedding without refuting it is pretty horrible. They could have issued a statement saying there was no truth to that rumour (without throwing Kate under the bus).

[Crimson Dynamo]

What...questioning the possible tone of a childs skin born to a mixed race couple?...the 2 women this morning couldnt believe she was insinuating racism with such comments.

it wholly depends on the context and in what way was it said

Its highly misleading (and of course manipulatingly deliberate) to just hang it out without any context

It was said to trigger her young fanbase, which is gross

[Smithy]

“It’s a one sided account”

Aye the palace/press haven’t had any say at all the last few years have they :skull:

[jet]

Well if they said it it must be true...
Just like The Duchess denied any input into Finding Freedom...when she did.

Finding Freedom:
Harry and Meghan - who were going to register Archie for dual citizenship - decided to forgo a title for their son, because they wanted him to be a private citizen until he was at an age where he could decide which path he would like to take'

Now its 'they refused to give Archie a title'.
Why would she want a title for Archie, and why are they hanging on to their titles? They despise the institution but are willing to use it to make money and hang on their status.

[Beso]

I don’t see any reason for her to lie about it. It’s her son she’s talking about. But you do you and ignore the facts.

She talking about something that happened to someone else ..she has no proof of it ever being said.

[AnnieK]

She talking about something that happened to someone else ..she has no proof of it ever being said.

It was said to Harry though and he then spoke about it in the interview. If its a lie, its a ****ty one as Archie will one day see it

[Glenn.]

She talking about something that happened to someone else ..she has no proof of it ever being said.

It was a conversation that happened with Harry.

[jet]

All we have right now is a one - sided version. Until we have Wills and Kate or the Queen and Charles doing their Oprah turn (as if!) we can't take anything as gospel. Meghan is going to skew events to suit her narrative and the American audience she wants to court, others would skew it to suit theirs.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Top 5 comments from the GBP via the Mailonline lead article:



I think if they were concerned about skin color, Queen would not have given permission to marry. 43,000 likes

What a lovely thing to do - air family disagreements on international television. This girl has no class and is a lesson in selfishness, ingratitude and ungraciouness 36,000 likes

Narcissist, toxic, manipulative - these all describe Meghan Markel to a 'T'. Remove her titles and the titles of her puppet in the grey suit while you're at it. 33, 000 likes

No! No, no, noooo. I cannot read anymore of this rubbish coming out of this woman's mouth. She is just grim. 28,000 likes

Well, shes thrown Kate under the bus less than 30 minutes in; Im hoping shes relieved of her pesky title. 26,000 likes

[Glenn.]

‘From the Mailonline lead article’

[Cherie]

You could say the same of Meghan detractors though. :shrug: she's lying and playing the victim whatever she says is the general consensus.

This interview was never going to change anyone's opinion of them. I'm bored of it already :laugh:

Its quite telling though if the story is true about the Kate / Meghan incident. I assume if Kate sent a note, that could be produced to prove it but for the Royals to have allowed the press to run with that story since the wedding without refuting it is pretty horrible. They could have issued a statement saying there was no truth to that rumour (without throwing Kate under the bus).

I am not making comments like this?

find it incredibly worrying that even though this interview is out now and theyve spoken their truth about what happened and how it happened, and let’s be honest, we know it’s true, they wouldn’t have said it if it wasn’t, there are still people still blinded by their dislike for them that they’re pulling them apart for it.
__________________

I am very sorry that Glenn is so worried

[Crimson Dynamo]

‘From the Mailonline lead article’

MailOnline is one of the world's largest English speaking newspaper websites with more than 252m global unique browsers. A trailblazing global phenomenon, MailOnline has 24.9m monthly unique visitors.


:thumbs:

only the best data for Tibb

[Cherie]

MailOnline is one of the world's largest English speaking newspaper websites with more than 252m global unique browsers. A trailblazing global phenomenon, MailOnline has 24.9m monthly unique visitors.


:thumbs:

only the best data for Tibb

It's what TiBB deserves :laugh:

[Glenn.]

MailOnline is one of the world's largest English speaking newspaper websites with more than 252m global unique browsers. A trailblazing global phenomenon, MailOnline has 24.9m monthly unique visitors.


:thumbs:

only the best data for Tibb

It’s a shame the readership isn’t quite the best though

[Cherie]

Families take offence at each other all the time, someone says something, someone else takes it the wrong way, we didn't have 20 years of JK because families got along, the Royals are no different :laugh:

The narrative when they left was that it was due to the Toxic Media, even up to Harry on the bus...da media

somewhere along the line the narrative changed

[Smithy]

Bat out of Hell 2 sold 14 million copies, that does not make it a good album

[Mitchell]

What a lovely thing to do - air family disagreements on international television.



But it was fine when her family was doing so?

[jet]

I has been around for years that Meghan made Kate cry at a fitting for the bridesmaid dresses. That has never been refuted by Meghan or Harry in all this time and now, all of a sudden, its the other way round?
Saving it for the big Oprah interview, eh?
Not buying it.

[Mitchell]

Bat out of Hell 2 sold 14 million copies, that does not make it a good album

Jesus – they crucified Jesus Christ and said he was wrong.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/08/02/40060380-0-image-a-12_1615169368107.jpg


Every UK Clip shown on UK TV channels
shows ITV 9PM tonight.


ITV is doing well with this CBS 2 hour
chat.

[Smithy]

I has been around for years that Meghan made Kate cry at a fitting for the bridesmaid dresses. That has never been refuted by Meghan or Harry in all this time and now, all of a sudden, its the other way round?
Saving it for the big Oprah interview, eh?
Not buying it.

They’re supposed to issue a statement every time a false news story surfaces?

They’ve got lives to live :pat:

[Cherie]

so who was at the first wedding?

[jet]

Families take offence at each other all the time, someone says something, someone else takes it the wrong way, we didn't have 20 years of JK because families got along, the Royals are no different :laugh:

The narrative when they left was that it was due to the Toxic Media, even up to Harry on the bus...da media

somewhere along the line the narrative changed

Yep, they got their patronages taken off them. Revenge, here we come!

[Beso]

Families take offence at each other all the time, someone says something, someone else takes it the wrong way, we didn't have 20 years of JK because families got along, the Royals are no different :laugh:

The narrative when they left was that it was due to the Toxic Media, even up to Harry on the bus...da media

somewhere along the line the narrative changed



Well it wouldn't have been a good look if he owned up to it all being about money.

[Cherie]

Well it wouldn't have been a good look if he owned up to it all being about money.

Royal Family are toxic but do call us the Duke and Duchess :laugh:

[AnnieK]

so who was at the first wedding?

Just the two of them and the Archbishop I think (didn't mention witnesses so obviously wasnt a legal wedding)

[Cherie]

Just the two of them and the Archbishop I think (didn't mention witnesses so obviously wasnt a legal wedding)

ah right did you watch it last night Annie?

[Tom4784]

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

So in order to prove one's mental health struggles to you, they have to die? What awful logic.

[jet]

Royal Family are toxic but do call us the Duke and Duchess :laugh:

:laugh:

[Tom4784]

Also, I'm just gonna say this, it's a good rule of thumb in life to look back at your arguments and positions on things. If you find yourself tying yourself in knots trying to defend something, going to extreme lengths to do so by disparaging issues of mental health or believing questionable sources, or even lessening the crimes of a peadophile so that Meghan looks 'worse' in comparison, you are probably in the wrong.

It's easy to defend a belief if it's morally correct, if you are in the right of things. Harder when you aren't and you're trying to do mental gymnastics to justify it.

[AnnieK]

I'm bored of it now.....there won't be any come back from the Palace so we won't get the other side of the story but I would live to be a fly on the wall in the various homes today to see what they really made of it :laugh:

[Cherie]

I'm bored of it now.....there won't be any come back from the Palace so we won't get the other side of the story but I would live to be a fly on the wall in the various homes today to see what they really made of it :laugh:

Yes it is boring tbh, I hope it brought them the closure they needed, although I understand there are other clips waiting to be aired? so it will probably rumble on for some time yet

[bots]

Before the interview aired, Ipsos Mori had been taking stock of people's attitude's to the Royal Family.

The Queen is the most popular member, with 40% of those polled selecting her as their favourite.

Prince William is second with 32%, followed by the Duchess of Cambridge, on 29%.

Prince Harry is fourth-most popular on 24%, a fall from his score of 42% in 2018.

The Duchess of Sussex, is the favourite for 13% of Britons polled, similar to her score of 14% in 2018.

[AnnieK]

ah right did you watch it last night Annie?

Nope....that's just what it says in the papers from their run down of the interview.

[Ammi]

...it’s very French to have two weddings, one personal, intimate one for the legal vows and one more official one to celebrate with others...and well, Paris is always a good idea...:flutter:...Remy’s influence, I reckon...we love to see it...:love:..

[Cherie]

Nope....that's just what it says in the papers from their run down of the interview.

ah right, I only saw the headlines on Sky this am

[smudgie]

...it’s very French to have two weddings, one personal, intimate one for the legal vows and one more official one to celebrate with others...and well, Paris is always a good idea...:flutter:...Remy’s influence, I reckon...we love to see it...:love:..

My sister-in-law married in a private ceremony 3 weeks before her actual wedding day.
The wedding then went ahead as a blessing.

[Ammi]

My sister-in-law married in a private ceremony 3 weeks before her actual wedding day.
The wedding then went ahead as a blessing.

...yeah, I think that more and more, ‘two weddings’ are becoming the thing../...have been over the last several years, I think...

[Crimson Dynamo]

Yes it is boring tbh, I hope it brought them the closure they needed, although I understand there are other clips waiting to be aired? so it will probably rumble on for some time yet

we still have the clip to watch of Kate and Wills laughing it up watching Pepe Le Pew cartoons

[jet]

The comparison is both had problems with mental health and were not supported or helped by the Palace. It's the same thing :shrug: Age doesn't really come into play with mental health, you can develop problems at any time.

Absolutely untrue. Diana had help even before she married and afterwards.
Lots of different help, all brought in from Charles and the Palace. I've read it all before, so it will be easily googled.

[jet]

I wonder is Oprah going to ask them why they didn't take up the post offered to them in Africa shortly after they married, we haven't heard everything yet. :idc:

[AnnieK]

Absolutely untrue. Diana had help even before she married and afterwards.
Lots of different help, all brought in from Charles and the Palace. I've read it all before, so it will be easily googled.

Bringing in doctors to throw pills at her and worry that she may have some terrible affliction that she could pass on to her children while all the time continuing the affair that had caused it all was not really all that helpful or supportive..

[Ammi]

...I don’t know if it’s already been said in the thread but Meghan revealed the answer to that important ...girl or boy, what will Archie’s sibling be...?...


...I’ll spoiler it for those who don’t wish to know...

...a baby daughter...:lovedup:...

[GoldHeart]

...I don’t know if it’s already been said in the thread but Meghan revealed the answer to that important ...girl or boy, what will Archie’s sibling be...?...


...I’ll spoiler it for those who don’t wish to know...

...a baby daughter...:lovedup:...

Aww that's lovely hopefully they'll be healthy and well .

[Ammi]

Bringing in doctors to throw pills at her and worry that she may have some terrible affliction that she could pass on to her children while all the time continuing the affair that had caused it all was not really all that helpful or supportive..

...she said that she was told she would have to seek help elsewhere because she wasn’t a member of staff...the reason also that she and Harry hoped for ‘Prince’ for Archie was for palace security and protection, not because a title was wanted as such...

[Ammi]

Aww that's lovely hopefully they'll be healthy and well .

...:lovedup:...

[Cherie]

...she said that she was told, she would have to seek help elsewhere because she wasn’t a member of staff...the reason also that she and Harry hoped for ‘Prince’ for Archie was for palace security and protection, not because a title was wanted as such...

I am so confused I thought they paid for their own

[jet]

Bringing in doctors to throw pills at her and worry that she may have some terrible affliction that she could pass on to her children while all the time continuing the affair that had caused it all was not really all that helpful or supportive..

That's unfair Annie. ONE doctor thought she might have an affliction.
She had help from a string of mental health professionals, just 'throwing pills at her' is an gross simplification.
I adored Diana and if they had refused her help, like Meghan claims they did with her, I would be the first to say so.

[Ammi]

I am so confused I thought they paid for their own

...this was while she was pregnant that they were told that Archie wouldn’t be a prince and have an equivalent security/protection to how she had believed/been led to believe...obviously Archie, would very much be a target as part of the Royal family...obviously I haven’t watched it all in full, just parts that are being reported...but that’s how it reads to me, it isn’t relating to their lives now in the USA, it was generally as a royal within the family in the U.K., which was their plan at the time...

[Livia]

You all know that 'Hidden Numbers' is on Film4 at 9? A story of some really courageous black women who fought oppression with their incredible intelligence and overcame discrimination and other obstacles to take an instrumental part in a historic global event.

Or you could watch a woman who was in one serial TV dramas and married a Prince.

I know which one I'll be watching.

[arista]

Paul Burrell
is Live on Ch4HD now
in the studio.

[Livia]

Paul Burrell
is Live on Ch4HD now
in the studio.

Jesus, is he still sliming about?

[Crimson Dynamo]

1368902642240524293

[Crimson Dynamo]

1368914528189169664

[jet]

Paul Burrell
is Live on Ch4HD now
in the studio.

"In all my 21 yrs working for the royal family i never saw racism"

Formerly footman and butler to the Queen and later Diana's butler.

[AnnieK]

That's unfair Annie. ONE doctor thought she might have an affliction.
She had help from a string of mental health professionals, just 'throwing pills at her' is an gross simplification.
I adored Diana and if they had refused her help, like Meghan claims they did with her, I would be the first to say so.

We will have to agree to disagree here Jet. The main help and support she needed was for Charles to be the husband and father she needed. Any help he got her was driven through guilt. She was sadly let down by all involved.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1368884073482121216

1368884074660642816
1368884075709280257

[Cherie]

...this was while she was pregnant that they were told that Archie wouldn’t be a prince and have an equivalent security/protection to how she had believed/been led to believe...obviously Archie, would very much be a target as part of the Royal family...obviously I haven’t watched it all in full, just parts that are being reported...but that’s how it reads to me, it isn’t relating to their lives now in the USA, it was generally as a royal within the family in the U.K., which was their plan at the time...

oh right, for me bringing what Archie's skin colour might be into the public domain is uncomfortable for me, I think while they want to get their point across, down the line this will come back to haunt them as it can never be taken back, and Archie may suffer for that comment going forward

Are children of the other Royals Princes and Princesses then, I don't know, will need to call on Jet I know Williams are but not sure about the rest :laugh:

[Cherie]

1368884073482121216

1368884074660642816
1368884075709280257

yes Harry needed to spit out the name, however it may be held for a further interview, like a teaser..:shrug:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Harry says “time heals all things” ... not sure his brother and sister-in-law will be coming
around anytime soon after essentially being called racist, inhumane and too obtuse to understand that they are “trapped”

Martha MacCallum
@marthamaccallum

[Amy Jade]

This is disgusting

It’s posts like this that cause real damage to people with mental health conditions

If Caroline flack hadn’t ****ing hung herself and got through her ordeal and talked about it would you have said the same?

:clap1:

[jet]

We will have to agree to disagree here Jet. The main help and support she needed was for Charles to be the husband and father she needed. Any help he got her was driven through guilt. She was sadly let down by all involved.

Oh I agree with you there - I was specifically referring to the statement that she was refused help; she certainly wasn't.

[Cherie]

"In all my 21 yrs working for the royal family i never saw racism"

Formerly footman and butler to the Queen and later Diana's butler.

oh

[Cherie]

Harry says “time heals all things” ... not sure his brother and sister-in-law will be coming
around anytime soon after essentially being called racist, inhumane and too obtuse to understand that they are “trapped”

Martha MacCallum
@marthamaccallum

Yeah I think he is off the Christmas card list for the foreseeable :laugh:

[Livia]

Poor Harry when she starts divorce proceedings and all his boats have been burned.

See you all back here for the "I told you so" part of the discussion.

[arista]

1368846445852426246

[GoldHeart]

oh right, for me bringing what Archie's skin colour might be into the public domain is uncomfortable for me, I think while they want to get their point across, down the line this will come back to haunt them as it can never be taken back, and Archie may suffer for that comment going forward

Are children of the other Royals Princes and Princesses then, I don't know, will need to call on Jet I know Williams are but not sure about the rest :laugh:

Archie suffered before he was born the poor little guy , imagine someone being worried about a baby's skin colour :umm2: .

It also shows sheer ignorance and stupidity on the person who said it (whoever that idiot is). It sounded like a fear that Archie would somehow come out "too dark" , either way disgusting racist mindset.

Not to mention the moment Archie was born , he got made the victim of a monkey joke thanks to brainless morons like Danny Baker .

I think it's important this gets addressed, Meghan hasn't named the person and I doubt they'll ever have the guts to admit what they said.

[Ammi]

oh right, for me bringing what Archie's skin colour might be into the public domain is uncomfortable for me, I think while they want to get their point across, down the line this will come back to haunt them as it can never be taken back, and Archie may suffer for that comment going forward

Are children of the other Royals Princes and Princesses then, I don't know, will need to call on Jet I know Williams are but not sure about the rest :laugh:

...my thoughts are that is would have been uncomfortable for Meghan’s heritage brought into anything by some media and public for sure ...and indeed, uncomfortable for her to hear that any such conversations were then also being had about Archie within her husband’s family...In her extended family support circle, I can’t imagine how that would have made her feel..well, I can actually...I’ve known situations similar and yeah...really very uncomfortable and awful for someone...that her son was being discussed in terms of his skin colour...

[Amy Jade]

1368914528189169664

Of course that cancerous vulture hates Meghan, as he does all black women.

[Cherie]

Archie suffered before he was born the poor little guy , imagine someone being worried about a baby's skin colour :umm2: .

It also shows sheer ignorance and stupidity on the person who said it (whoever that idiot is). It sounded like a fear that Archie would somehow come out "too dark" , either way disgusting racist mindset.

Not to mention the moment Archie was born , he got made the victim of a monkey joke thanks to brainless morons like Danny Baker .

I think it's important this gets addressed, Meghan hasn't named the person and I doubt they'll ever have the guts to admit what they said.

yes I get all that, but its out there now, you know how cruel school kids can be?



Breaking Ophrah confirmed it was not Liz or Phil who made the comment

[Crimson Dynamo]

1368917864154009601

[Amy Jade]

1368846445852426246

Queen.

[Cherie]

...my thoughts are that is would have been uncomfortable for Meghan’s heritage brought into anything by some media and public for sure ...and indeed, uncomfortable for her to hear that any such conversations were then also being had about Archie within her husband’s family...In her extended family support circle, I can’t imagine how that would have made her feel..well, I can actually...I’ve known situations similar and yeah...really very uncomfortable and awful for someone...that her son was being discussed in terms of his skin colour...

as a teacher, you know that that is not how it might play out in the school yard

kids get bullied because their parents die, some kids are not kind

[Crimson Dynamo]

1368912741256331268

:joker:

[Livia]

OMG Trisha Goddard? Are they going to gather the opinion of every black woman who sides with them? LOL.....

[jet]

oh right, for me bringing what Archie's skin colour might be into the public domain is uncomfortable for me, I think while they want to get their point across, down the line this will come back to haunt them as it can never be taken back, and Archie may suffer for that comment going forward

Are children of the other Royals Princes and Princesses then, I don't know, will need to call on Jet I know Williams are but not sure about the rest :laugh:

William's are because he's heir to the throne.

:hehe: Princess Anne's children aren't, she didn't want it, nor Prince Edwards,
nor any of their childrens children.
Prince Andrews children Beatrice and Eugenie are Princesses, but he pays for their security himself.
I think that's all correct. :hee:

[Ammi]

as a teacher, you know that that is not how it might play out in the school yard

kids get bullied because their parents die, some kids are not kind

...sorry, I don’t understand what you’re saying, Cherie...the connection..?...

[Cherie]

...sorry, I don’t understand what you’re saying, Cherie...the connection..?...

that their comments about his skin colour will be googable for ever? and might affect his life going forward, am I being very obtuse?

[Cherie]

1368912741256331268

:joker:

:joker: is that it?

[Cherie]

William's are because he's heir to the throne.

:hehe: Princess Anne's children aren't, she didn't want it, nor Prince Edwards,
nor any of their childrens children.
Prince Andrews children Beatrice and Eugenie are Princesses, but he pays for their security himself.
I think that's all correct. :hee:

oh right, so it's not the norm