Phillip Schofield's younger brother is a Paedophile/ Phillip 'Fully' leaves ITV

[arista]

everyone at ITV must have known about this



Of course

New Young Lad he brought into the studio
after he met him aged 10....................................

[arista]

A4hHmfU6xmU

Whole family are dirty buggers


Thanks for posting

[Glenn.]

Would you feel differently if he had known a little girl from the age of ten, got her a job at 15, then a sexual relationship with her at 18..him being 50 odd and all that?

They could have started a sexual relationship at 16 and it would still be no one’s business.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/27/08/71473595-0-image-a-4_1685173549260.jpg

Sure she knew
but what could she do?


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12130759/Did-Holly-know-Attention-turns-Phillip-Schofields-star.html

[Beso]

They could have started a sexual relationship at 16 and it would still be no one’s business.

When hes been perving over him since he was ten I'm going to make it my business.

Gay predators don't get special compensation from me just because they are gay.

[Liam-]

So he’s admitted to an unwise relationship with a younger man, apologised for lying, apologised for misleading his friends, his management and the daily mail (lol) he’s stepped down from all duties and been sacked by his management, still no proof that anything untoward happened before the guy was legal, yet he’s already faced more severe consequences for an affair than any average straight person has in my memory.

[UserSince2005]

I fear this is just the beginning.

Of course. He’s having his say before the papers start telling the real story.

If this was all it was. He just let the papers print the story and let it blow over in a year.

[GoldHeart]

I'm not fan of Schofield, but what's it gotta do with ITV if he has an affair with a guy over 18??

What's it any of their business??? It's only between Schofield and his wife.

ITV saying they're 'disappointed'. BUTT out (no pun intended ;) ) it's not of your business. :p


[QUOTE=Glenn.;11295131]They could have started a sexual relationship at 16 and it would still be no one’s business.

Would you still be saying that if it was a man & young girl relationship? .

Plus Schofield knew the guy from aged 10 ,you don't find that weird & groomer vibes??? .

[UserSince2005]

At the very best he’s pre ordered a boy at the age of a 10.
But obviously it is so much worse and many many boys.

[Crimson Dynamo]

They could have started a sexual relationship at 16 and it would still be no one’s business.

:umm2:

[thesheriff443]

None of what’s happening is being done through choice
It’s all about saving themselves by moving the goalposts

People turning a blind eye to a dirty old man abusing his position of trust.

If Phil’s brother had not been caught, Phil would still be on this morning with holly lying away as usual.

[bots]

it does seem that pressure was applied after his brother was convicted. My guess is that friends of Holly started saying to her .... you seriously didn't know? and that forced Holly to change her approach to him, otherwise it would have been business as usual

[UserSince2005]

it does seem that pressure was applied after his brother was convicted. My guess is that friends of Holly started saying to her .... you seriously didn't know? and that forced Holly to change her approach to him, otherwise it would have been business as usual

I think with his brother situation going on. The papers went into overdrive with the stories they wanted to print and so Phil couldn’t afford to super injunct them all.
Maybe he was going to let some of the lesser stories slip threw and Holly wasn’t having it. The deal between them was that he would keep the papers silent and she wasn’t having it.

[DigitalSid]

If the claims made here are true, this could get a whole lot more serious:
https://twitter.com/kaihumphries/status/1661431051166646287

[Glenn.]

When hes been perving over him since he was ten I'm going to make it my business.

Gay predators don't get special compensation from me just because they are gay.

You have no evidence or proof that Philip is a gay predator. Not sure what his sexuality has to do with it but then again it’s you were talking about.

Sounds to me like they had a consensual relationship, albeit behind his wife’s back. Unless he’s come forward and claimed that Philip groomed him of course?

The age of consent is 16. Bore off with your faux outrage because you’re too ignorant to see past his sexuality.

[UserSince2005]

You have no evidence or proof that Philip is a gay predator. Not sure what his sexuality has to do with it but then again it’s you were talking about.

Sounds to me like they had a consensual relationship, albeit behind his wife’s back. Unless he’s come forward and claimed that Philip groomed him of course?

The age of consent is 16. Bore off with your faux outrage because you’re too ignorant to see past his sexuality.

You’re on the wrong side.
I’d just be quiet given the tide and wait it out before commenting.
You’re going to be left very red faced once the truths all come out.

[Glenn.]

[QUOTE=Gusto Brunt;11295097]I'm not fan of Schofield, but what's it gotta do with ITV if he has an affair with a guy over 18??

What's it any of their business??? It's only between Schofield and his wife.

ITV saying they're 'disappointed'. BUTT out (no pun intended ;) ) it's not of your business. :p




Would you still be saying that if it was a man & young girl relationship? .

Plus Schofield knew the guy from aged 10 ,you don't find that weird & groomer vibes??? .

Yes I would. People are far too quick to get themselves involved in peoples lives.

The age of consent is 16. You can clutch your pearls all you want. If he consented it’s no one’s business.

[Glenn.]

You’re on the wrong side.
I’d just be quiet given the tide and wait it out before commenting.
You’re going to be left very red faced once the truths all come out.

Maybe everyone else should wait it out before making assumptions No?

[rusticgal]

I'm not fan of Schofield, but what's it gotta do with ITV if he has an affair with a guy over 18??

What's it any of their business??? It's only between Schofield and his wife.

ITV saying they're 'disappointed'. BUTT out (no pun intended ;) ) it's not of your business. :p

Also, I think Schofield is under a lot of mental pressure. I think the media need to back down in case he has suicide thoughts.


Because maybe this 'affair' started when the guy was much younger...too young.

[AnnieK]

The fact of this is he lied. To his wife and family and also to his bosses when questioned. There's no coming back from that breach of trust from an employers point of view. I would bet plenty of stars have had affairs with much younger / older / same sex / opposite sex colleagues. ITVs stance is from a breach of trust viewpoint. Anything else would ve discriminatory but because he has lied when questioned he has provided them with a get out clause.

[UserSince2005]

Maybe everyone else should wait it out before making assumptions No?

Because it’s obvious where this is going. No need to wait we already have all the dots.

[Liam-]

Because maybe this 'affair' started when the guy was much younger...too young.

Baseless theories don’t equal proof, building a narrative around something without any proof is bizarre

[DigitalSid]

Interesting how many LGBTQs are defending him.

[GoldHeart]

Yes I would. People are far too quick to get themselves involved in peoples lives.

The age of consent is 16. You can clutch your pearls all you want. If he consented it’s no one’s business.

Glenn he's known the guy since he was a little minor! 10 years old .....You don't think that's weird and has groomer vibes ?? , Especially considering what his brother has been arrested for. If he's trained someone or offered them a job and known them all this time,then that's abuse of power. And I find it very questionable.

How would you feel if a babysitter had looked after someone since they were a little kid , and then started dating and sleeping with them as soon as they were 'legal' . Do you not question that entire relationship and the intentions??, It has dodgy written all over it.

[UserSince2005]

Interesting how many LGBTQs are defending him.

It disgusting. And us gays wonder why people think we are perverted freaks

[GoldHeart]

Because maybe this 'affair' started when the guy was much younger...too young.

This is what I think aswell , it's just too weird that he knew him as a kid .

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is what I think aswell , it's just too weird that he knew him as a kid .

knew him as a child and when he could he got him a job so he could see him every day...

[Liam-]

Interesting how many LGBTQs are defending him.

He was right to step down for his behaviour and lying to his bosses and bringing them into question, defending someone being accused of awful crimes without any evidence? I’d hope most people would do that, especially when it’s coming, for a large chunk of it, from a place of ignorance and bigotry.

If proof comes to light that he did commit crimes, lock him up for as long as possible, but until then, it’s just conspiracy theories

[AnnieK]

He was right to step down for his behaviour and lying to his bosses and bringing them into question, defending someone being accused of awful crimes without any evidence? I’d hope most people would do that, especially when it’s coming, for a large chunk of it, from a place of ignorance and bigotry.

If proof comes to light that he did commit crimes, lock him up for as long as possible, but until then, it’s just conspiracy theories

I agree that baseless accusations are very dangerous and severe allegations should wait until they are actually proven.

I disagree, however, that people are coming at this from a place of bigotry or ignorance. I can pretty much guarantee that every member in this thread wold be equally as accusatory were this a straight man and a much younger woman who he had known since she was a child. I don't think his sexuality plays much part in most people's thought process.

[Vanessa]

Why the NDA if he has nothing to hide?
He has known that lad since he was 10......

[DigitalSid]

He was right to step down for his behaviour and lying to his bosses and bringing them into question, defending someone being accused of awful crimes without any evidence? I’d hope most people would do that, especially when it’s coming, for a large chunk of it, from a place of ignorance and bigotry.

If proof comes to light that he did commit crimes, lock him up for as long as possible, but until then, it’s just conspiracy theories


Bigotry towards whom exactly, alleged groomers?

[Liam-]

I didn’t mention people on here, I meant in the general discussions that are being had everywhere, but now that you mention members on here, there are definitely a few that are viewing this story from a bigoted viewpoint

[DigitalSid]

Why the NDA if he has nothing to hide?
He has known that lad since he was 10......

More importantly who remembers kids they met once years ago. Let alone contacts them and offers to help get them a job?

[DigitalSid]

I didn’t mention people on here, I meant in the general discussions that are being had everywhere, but now that you mention members on here, there are definitely a few that are viewing this story from a bigoted viewpoint

Again, bigotry towards whom?

[Liam-]

Bigotry towards whom exactly, alleged groomers?

Has someone made allegations against him? Must have missed that one

[bots]

i keep coming back to the fact that none of this is new. It's been known by the general public for years now. There is a large slice of smoke and mirrors going on now and coincidence or not, it seems to have come to a head on his brothers conviction.

I personally think there is more yet to come out, but i wouldn't speculate on what that could be

[AnnieK]

I didn’t mention people on here, I meant in the general discussions that are being had everywhere, but now that you mention members on here, there are definitely a few that are viewing this story from a bigoted viewpoint

Well I was going to apologise for misinterpreting your post but as you have now stated that, I have to respectfully disagree again as I believe that the reaction would have been the same if it had been a heterosexual male (or femle) presenter having an affair with a much younger employee in the same circumstances.

I don't doubt that there are people on here with very different opinions and views on sexuality, many that I don't agree with, but in this instance the age that they were first introduced seems to be the very reason people are concerned

[DigitalSid]

Has someone made allegations against him? Must have missed that one

Once again, bigotry towards whom?

[Crimson Dynamo]

His wife must divorce him now and take him to the fckg cleaners

[DigitalSid]

i keep coming back to the fact that none of this is new. It's been known by the general public for years now. There is a large slice of smoke and mirrors going on now and coincidence or not, it seems to have come to a head on his brothers conviction.

I personally think there is more yet to come out, but i wouldn't speculate on what that could be

A woman who worked on SM:TV in the 2000s said there were rumours about him in the industry back then.

[Swan]

He started out on kids tv too

[GoldHeart]

Well I was going to apologise for misinterpreting your post but as you have now stated that, I have to respectfully disagree again as I believe that the reaction would have been the same if it had been a heterosexual male (or femle) presenter having an affair with a much younger employee in the same circumstances.

I don't doubt that there are people on here with very different opinions and views on sexuality, many that I don't agree with, but in this instance the age that they were first introduced seems to be the very reason people are concerned

Exactly Annie

Like I said I found it weird when Cheryl started dating Liam and had a kid with him,as she knew him when he was 14 :shrug:. Ok nothing illegal happened then ...but still a bit weird.

[Beso]

You have no evidence or proof that Philip is a gay predator. Not sure what his sexuality has to do with it but then again it’s you were talking about.

Sounds to me like they had a consensual relationship, albeit behind his wife’s back. Unless he’s come forward and claimed that Philip groomed him of course?

The age of consent is 16. Bore off with your faux outrage because you’re too ignorant to see past his sexuality.




His sexuality is very relevant after he was lauded as a hero for coming out, lauded by the gays even though he cheated on his wife for all those years. He isnt even gay, cause if he was he wouldnt have been able to get hard for his wife.

Him being gay is a smokescreen for him being a paedophile who grooms children so he can **** them when they come of age.

You are the one more concerned about his sexuality, cause you have given the creep a free pass because of his supposed homosexuality.

[Beso]

[QUOTE=GoldHeart;11295138]

Yes I would. People are far too quick to get themselves involved in peoples lives.

The age of consent is 16. You can clutch your pearls all you want. If he consented it’s no one’s business.

What's your views on prince andrew ?

[Glenn.]

Not even wasting my time on that bollocks. ****ing ignorant **** mate

[Glenn.]

Glenn he's known the guy since he was a little minor! 10 years old .....You don't think that's weird and has groomer vibes ?? , Especially considering what his brother has been arrested for. If he's trained someone or offered them a job and known them all this time,then that's abuse of power. And I find it very questionable.

How would you feel if a babysitter had looked after someone since they were a little kid , and then started dating and sleeping with them as soon as they were 'legal' . Do you not question that entire relationship and the intentions??, It has dodgy written all over it.

If it was consensual then good for them? What part of that aren’t you understanding?

[GoldHeart]

If it was consensual then good for them? What part of that aren’t you understanding?

:facepalm:

[Glenn.]

People are too wrapped up in everyone else’s lives these days. Mind your own business. How does a relationship someone on the telly have any impact on your lives?

[Beso]

People are too wrapped up in everyone else’s lives these days. Mind your own business. How does a relationship someone on the telly have any impact on your lives?

Your views on prince andrew and that girl?

[Beso]

Not even wasting my time on that bollocks. ****ing ignorant **** mate

The ramblings of a defeated man.

Carry on defending the paedo glenn. The world is watching.

[Glenn.]

You’re not worth my time

[Beso]

You’re not worth my time

What's your views on prince andrew and Virginia?

[rusticgal]

People are too wrapped up in everyone else’s lives these days. Mind your own business. How does a relationship someone on the telly have any impact on your lives?


...says he who keeps on about Prince Williams rumoured affair...:smug:

[Glenn.]

What's your views on prince andrew and Virginia?

How does that even compare? Prince Andrew is accused of actual sexual abuse. Suggests to me that she didn’t give consent.

Clearly you’re incapable of understanding, basic sense.

Philip hasn’t been accused of sexual abuse. By all means show me where he has.

[Beso]

How does that even compare? Prince Andrew is accused of actual sexual abuse. Suggests to me that she didn’t give consent.

Clearly you’re incapable of understanding, basic sense.

Philip hasn’t been accused of sexual abuse. By all means show me where he has.


I will in 2 weeks..

I promise.

[Beso]

...says he who keeps on about Prince Williams rumoured affair...:smug:

Very true.. I think hes forgotten about that.

[Glenn.]

I will in 2 weeks..

I promise.

But not yet though? Pathetic

[GoldHeart]

But not yet though? Pathetic

And you don't think the timing of all this reeks of guilt ? .

[Glenn.]

Again when there’s actual evidence we’ll go from there.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Philth and HOlly the new Epstein and Maxwell ?

[Beso]

But not yet though? Pathetic

https://www.tiktok.com/@mumlikesalaugh/video/7196976196259925254

[DigitalSid]

Again when there’s actual evidence we’ll go from there.

People said similar things about Saville back in 2010/2011.

[Glenn.]

https://www.tiktok.com/@mumlikesalaugh/video/7196976196259925254

I’m sure he’s been the police and given his statement.

[Glenn.]

People said similar things about Saville back in 2010/2011.

Again until we’ve had evidence it’s all conjecture

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot_20230527_143005_twitter-jpg.2199368/

[GoldHeart]

People said similar things about Saville back in 2010/2011.

It's actually disgusting and gross that Saville got away with it. He even joked about his crimes aswell,which are disturbing to hear :umm2: .

[DigitalSid]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot_20230527_143005_twitter-jpg.2199368/

Still feeling confident, Glenn m8?

[GoldHeart]

Again until we’ve had evidence it’s all conjecture

It's not looking good though is it

[Crimson Dynamo]

This pic may be in tomorrows papers

MM approaching HW at the NTA's

https://tattle.life/attachments/matt-holly-jpg.2199359/

[bots]

MM?

[Glenn.]

If it turns out that he did sexually assault him then I hope there is justice. As there hasn’t been anything, only ignorant speculation.

[Crimson Dynamo]

MM?

Matthew McGreevey

Who interestingly the DM just refuse to name in their articles about Philth?

:think:

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/TonyDortie/status/1662455641468960770?s=20

[Beso]

I’m sure he’s been the police and given his statement.

Tomorrows papers should be interesting.

[Beso]

If it turns out that he did sexually assault him then I hope there is justice. As there hasn’t been anything, only ignorant speculation.

I dont believe you.

[Glenn.]

I dont believe you.

Really don’t care

[Beso]

Matthew McGreevey

Who interestingly the DM just refuse to name in their articles about Philth?

:think:

Probably because he was underage and the mai therefore cant print his name along side the fresh allegations that will come out tomorrow.

I mean, if they could do, the story would be out there right now with photos and everything, but they cant do that because it involves a minor. If it didnt and he was of age at the time it would already be splashed on all the papers.

[Beso]

We got to be honest here.. MM wont be the only one.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/02d30041-b806-4bd6-9552-a5eff6dd79ad-png.2199411/

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/ciabaudo/status/1227476991437348867?s=20

[rusticgal]

https://tattle.life/attachments/02d30041-b806-4bd6-9552-a5eff6dd79ad-png.2199411/


Oh dear....

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/img_1357-jpeg.2199566/

[Crimson Dynamo]

Rylan Clark shares cryptic photograph just minutes after Phillip Schofield quit
ITV and admitted to having affair with young male This Morning colleague

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/27/09/71474455-12130829-Oh_Rylan_Clark_34_shared_a_cryptic_photograph_on_F riday_just_min-a-63_1685176676264.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12130829/Rylan-Clark-shares-cryptic-photograph-just-minutes-Phillip-Schofields-affair-admission.html#comments

more than one?

[bots]

isn't that the churchill V for victory

[Kazanne]

Its really not nice the amount of vitriol that is going round about Phillip Scholfield,I have no feelings on him either way but to post stuff like that outside his house is not on especially for his wife and kids, I really don't know the full facts of whats gone on but it seems he liked someone much younger, but didnt actually act on it,till the young man was old enough,did he force him into anything ? but whateverhas occured the public need to butt out and let justice do its course,the public just like gossip and hearsay so at least lets wait and see what comes out,whatever happened to #BeKind

[UserSince2005]

I hope there a rylan scoffield sex tape out there

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its really not nice the amount of vitriol that is going round about Phillip Scholfield,I have no feelings on him either way but to post stuff like that outside his house is not on especially for his wife and kids, I really don't know the full facts of whats gone on but it seems he liked someone much younger, but didnt actually act on it,till the young man was old enough,did he force him into anything ? but whateverhas occured the public need to butt out and let justice do its course,the public just like gossip and hearsay so at least lets wait and see what comes out,whatever happened to #BeKind

There is nothing "kind" about a compulsive liar who cheats onand publically humiliates his wife and family, lies to his best friends and employer all for sexual gratification and hides behind odious campaigns like #bekind

[Crimson Dynamo]

DAN WOOTTON: I told ITV about Phillip Schofield’s affair with his young
colleague in 2019 and urged them to investigate but they dismissed it as
‘malicious gossip’. What followed looks like nothing short of a cover-up

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12131515/DAN-WOOTTON-told-ITV-Schofields-affair-2019-followed-looks-like-cover-up.html

[Crimson Dynamo]

oh and remember this?

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/08/article-2229808-15EBC8B8000005DC-341_634x809.jpg

[Zizu]

https://limegoss.com/phillip-schofield-timeline-events/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

"But, as I've just outlined, the 'rumours' were known months earlier [before 2020]
because they were far more than 'rumours'; the man [MM] had become a non-
negotiable part of Phillip's life, with ITV cars ferrying him from the TV studios to the
presenter's apartment."

"At the National Television Awards on January 28, 2020, there was an altercation
between the man and both Phillip and Holly separately, witnessed by senior ITV staff in
attendance, including the high powered director of television Kevin Lygo."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12131515/DAN-WOOTTON-told-ITV-Schofields-affair-2019-followed-looks-like-cover-up.html

:skull:

HW having taken legal advice is playing dumb...

[UserSince2005]

"But, as I've just outlined, the 'rumours' were known months earlier [before 2020]
because they were far more than 'rumours'; the man [MM] had become a non-
negotiable part of Phillip's life, with ITV cars ferrying him from the TV studios to the
presenter's apartment."

"At the National Television Awards on January 28, 2020, there was an altercation
between the man and both Phillip and Holly separately, witnessed by senior ITV staff in
attendance, including the high powered director of television Kevin Lygo."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12131515/DAN-WOOTTON-told-ITV-Schofields-affair-2019-followed-looks-like-cover-up.html

:skull:

HW having taken legal advice is playing dumb...

Playing dumb is what that evil bitch does best

[Zizu]

Playing dumb is what that evil bitch does best


Has she blocked you on Instagram or something !?

Why so much hate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[UserSince2005]

Has she blocked you on Instagram or something !?

Why so much hate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I hate fake people.

She disgusts me

She is a phoney

[Zizu]

I hate fake people.

She disgusts me

She is a phoney


There must be a thousand more fake people than her in showbiz though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[user104658]

Yes I would. People are far too quick to get themselves involved in peoples lives.

The age of consent is 16. You can clutch your pearls all you want. If he consented it’s no one’s business.

"Men in their 50's Grooming kids is OK so long as they wait until they're 16 before they put their dick in them"

Utterly ****ing repugnant in all honesty Glenn.

[bots]

Holly Willoughby has said it has been "very hurtful" to discover her former co-host Phillip Schofield lied about his affair with a younger colleague.

On Friday, Schofield confirmed he had lied about a relationship he had with a young male ITV employee.

In a statement, Willoughby said: "When reports of this relationship first surfaced, I asked Phil directly if this was true and was told it was not.

"It's been very hurtful to now find out that this was a lie."

Writing on Instagram, Willoughby added it had "taken time to process yesterday's news".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-65735702


----------------------------------

So it follows then that if yesterdays revelation from Phil was a complete surprise, then their rift must have been about something else

[DigitalSid]

"Men in their 50's Grooming kids is OK so long as they wait until they're 16 before they put their dick in them"

Utterly ****ing repugnant in all honesty Glenn.

I wonder if those with "It was legal so who cares" attitude would say the same if the age of consent was lower?

[Glenn.]

"Men in their 50's Grooming kids is OK so long as they wait until they're 16 before they put their dick in them"

Utterly ****ing repugnant in all honesty Glenn.

Again no evidence of grooming and if he consented to him putting his dick in them it’s not really anyone’s business but theirs. The entitlement to peoples lives is repugnant.

By all means if it comes out that he did indeed ‘groom’ him, then yeah he needs to face the law. I’m not going to sit on the internet blasting my mouth off like an ignorant moron.

[Zizu]

Again no evidence of grooming and if he consented to him putting his dick in them it’s not really anyone’s business but theirs. The entitlement to peoples lives is repugnant.

By all means if it comes out that he did indeed ‘groom’ him, then yeah he needs to face the law. I’m not going to sit on the internet blasting my mouth off like an ignorant moron.


Intriguing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[user104658]

Again no evidence of grooming and if he consented to him putting his dick in them it’s not really anyone’s business but theirs. The entitlement to peoples lives is repugnant.

By all means if it comes out that he did indeed ‘groom’ him, then yeah he needs to face the law. I’m not going to sit on the internet blasting my mouth off like an ignorant moron.

The normalising of older adult men pursuing and having sex with teenagers is everyone's business if we hope to continue to live in a world with any moral fabric whatsoever, I would have thought. "But it's legal tho" isn't good enough and far from it.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/27/23/71487605-12131993-Phil_with_fellow_younger_colleague_who_became_his_ lover_leaving_-a-28_1685225606838.jpg
Dirty Bugger
with his 15 year old lover
[pictured leaving The Ivy together in 2017]

[arista]

[Phillip Schofield's lover was just FIFTEEN
when they met: Schoolboy asked star for
job on This Morning three years before he
was hired as a production assistant and
began affair with the then
50-something presenter - as photos of them
together emerge]

[Phillip Schofield's lover was just 15 when
met while he was at a theatre school
The schoolboy asked him for a job
and Schofield arranged an interview for him]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12131993/Schofields-lover-just-15-met-Schoolboy-asked-Phillip-job-Morning.html

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-5fbd2a64-381e-448e-aa42-c9f1f83270ff.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-0fa533a7-6444-4003-927e-46f9399ad17a.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-3be660da-41c9-4a00-8482-afc89d49fb30.png

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxKnTrhXwAAW8zW?format=jpg&name=medium

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxK0xY6WcAENab7?format=jpg&name=small

[Gusto Brunt]

The whole ITV set up is falling apart. This Morning about to be axed.

Schofield has lost everything. Even his management company dumped him. He should be on suicide watch.

[arista]

The whole ITV set up is falling apart. This Morning about to be axed.

Schofield has lost everything. Even his management company dumped him. He should be on suicide watch.

His Current Boyfriend
is out alot.

[Gusto Brunt]

His Current Younger Boyfriend
is out alot.


I just have thoughts of Caroline Flack. The media can hound people into a noose.

[arista]

I just have thoughts of Caroline Flack. The media can hound people into a noose.

Yes Flack
a rare case,
took the press and media to her heart.

A Miss Understanding over her beating her boyfriend

[Gusto Brunt]

Yes Flack
a rare case,
took the press and media to her heart.

A Miss Understanding over her beating her boyfriend

The media are like wolves. They are determined to hunt down their prey.

[arista]

The media are like wolves. They are determined to hunt down their prey.

Sure
but in Phillip's case
it is Justified.


When he was younger
He was on BBC1 TV
serving Children

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxJykw1WAAA6itT?format=jpg&name=small

[arista]

https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1660536986682236928

[Vanessa]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/27/23/71487605-12131993-Phil_with_fellow_younger_colleague_who_became_his_ lover_leaving_-a-28_1685225606838.jpg
Dirty Bugger
with his 15 year old lover
[pictured leaving The Ivy together in 2017]

This should definitely be investigated. If he was 15 when they were meeting up in hotels that's underage!

[Oliver_W]

This should definitely be investigated. If he was 15 when they were meeting up in hotels that's underage!

That's actually legal in somd parts of Europe, so I'm sure if they'd gone abroad for their hookups we'd have to remember it's none of our business :rolleyes:

[Liam-]

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

[arista]

This should definitely be investigated. If he was 15 when they were meeting up in hotels that's underage!

Yes
we have to wait until Tuesday

Because Bank Holiday
not many arrests

[arista]

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

Meeting the Lad,
Privately aged 15
is from Printed Newspapers today.

Newspapers are Not Internet

Slick Liam.

[Zizu]

https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1660536986682236928


I’ve always thought Eamon Holmes was a slimeball and this photo suggests he’s also a hypocrite .https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230528/954fa837e07d3b8fbaeff08c63949620.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

Meeting the Lad,
Privately aged 15
is from Printed Newspapers today.

Newspapers are Not Internet

Slick Liam.
Where though?

I’ve always thought Eamon Holmes was a slimeball and this photo suggests he’s also a hypocrite .https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230528/954fa837e07d3b8fbaeff08c63949620.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Oh yeah, sitting on a couch on a couch as part of a tv show, with fellow presenters from the same tv show as himself says all we need to know about his character :crazy:

[Glenn.]

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

.

[GoldHeart]

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

Would you be saying the same if Simon Cowell met a 15 year old girl at a hotel alone, I guess that would be innocent too and just ' professional '. As it will all be to
get her a music contract...and completely 'fine ' :whistle: .

[Glenn.]

There’s a lot of what ifs in this thread :joker:

[Zizu]

Where though?



Oh yeah, sitting on a couch on a couch as part of a tv show, with fellow presenters from the same tv show as himself says all we need to know about his character :crazy:


Holmes is smiling and gripping Schofield’s hand .. someone he’s supposed to detest .. hense my suggestion Holmes was a hypocrite


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[UserSince2005]

I’m shocked at the stance some gays in this thread are taking

No one’s first experience should be a dirty old man cumming dust.

[Liam-]

There’s a lot of what ifs in this thread :joker:

Backing up their hypothetical theories with other hypothetical scenarios, to justify accusing someone of crimes they haven’t even been accused of

[GoldHeart]

Holmes is smiling and gripping Schofield’s hand .. someone he’s supposed to detest .. hense my suggestion Holmes was a hypocrite


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I know you don't want to hear this Zizu ....but I think that also applies to Holly. But I agree that Holmes is a hypocrite likely. I think anyone who initially stood by Schofield...are now doing damage control to save their own careers.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/EamonnHolmes/status/1662216829740388352?s=20

[bots]

but the whole sickly sweet coming out event was complete cringe. Anyone looking at that knew that there wasn't a sincere person sitting on that sofa

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/jackjonestv/status/1661358821694926850?s=20

[arista]

https://twitter.com/jackjonestv/status/1661358821694926850?s=20


Yes Underage

[Oliver_W]

https://twitter.com/jackjonestv/status/1661358821694926850?s=20

Tbh sitting at the same table as him proves nothing.

[Cherie]

https://twitter.com/EamonnHolmes/status/1662216829740388352?s=20

Its all so cringey :laugh: so brave

[Crimson Dynamo]

Tbh sitting at the same table as him proves nothing.

Matthew McGreevy is 21 this year

that video was in 2014

the two of them having a private lunch

in 2014 Schofield was 52 and MM would have been around 12

Schofield says they never had sex until the boy was 16

Schofield has lied about everything to do with his life to date to everyone and anyone

[Kazanne]

Would you be saying the same if Simon Cowell met a 15 year old girl at a hotel alone, I guess that would be innocent too and just ' professional '. As it will all be to
get her a music contract...and completely 'fine ' :whistle: .

Some celebrities who people revere have done the same,Elvis met Pricilla when she was 14, Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin,Bill Wyman met his future wife when she was 13,no doubt they told a few porkies about thier relationships ,I just dont see why the witch hunt for Scholfield, and why is it top news when other more important things are going on,I get the tabloid fodder will have a field day with it,but its he TV news aswell, have I missed something ?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Some celebrities who people revere have done the same,Elvis met Pricilla when she was 14, Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin,Bill Wyman met his future wife when she was 13,no doubt they told a few porkies about thier relationships ,I just dont see why the witch hunt for Scholfield, and why is it top news when other more important things are going on,I get the tabloid fodder will have a field day with it,but its he TV news aswell, have I missed something ?

"Some celebrities who people revere have done the same"


The examples you give are all at least 40 years ago

and none were married with kids

[Kazanne]

"Some celebrities who people revere have done the same"


The examples you give are all at least 40 years ago

and none were married with kids

But maybe his wife and kids are accepting of him ,we dont know do we ?She seems to have stayed with him over him coming out etc so maybe she just loves him,and those things may have happened over 40 years ago,but it will still be going on,I am not excusing anything hes done ,but was any of it illegal ?

[bots]

But maybe his wife and kids are accepting of him ,we dont know do we ?She seems to have stayed with him over him coming out etc so maybe she just loves him,and those things may have happened over 40 years ago,but it will still be going on,I am not excusing anything hes done ,but was any of it illegal ?

his wife divorced him didn't she?

[Crimson Dynamo]

But maybe his wife and kids are accepting of him ,we dont know do we ?She seems to have stayed with him over him coming out etc so maybe she just loves him,and those things may have happened over 40 years ago,but it will still be going on,I am not excusing anything hes done ,but was any of it illegal ?

No wife and kids are accepting of a man in his 50s shagging a 16 year old boy that he groomed from age 10

having sex with a kid that is 6 years younger than his youngest daughter

:umm2:

[arista]

Matthew McGreevy is 21 this year

that video was in 2014

the two of them having a private lunch

in 2014 Schofield was 52 and MM would have been around 12

Schofield says they never had sex until the boy was 16

Schofield has lied about everything to do with his life to date to everyone and anyone

Yes,
some around him
know the full truth.

[GoldHeart]

Some celebrities who people revere have done the same,Elvis met Pricilla when she was 14, Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin,Bill Wyman met his future wife when she was 13,no doubt they told a few porkies about thier relationships ,I just dont see why the witch hunt for Scholfield, and why is it top news when other more important things are going on,I get the tabloid fodder will have a field day with it,but its he TV news aswell, have I missed something ?

Kaz you know me ,I equally found all those other celeb relationships you just mentioned just as gross and creepy . There is double standards, maybe because those people you mentioned were a long time ago ( it shouldn't be an excuse as I still think it's wrong) .

But with Schofield , his own brother was arrested for child abuse. And the timing of all this is Sus , it seems apparent that he's lied alot . Yes there is other things happening in the news, but if Schofield groomed this guy then it's wrong on so many levels .

And I would be saying the same thing regardless of who the celebrity is ,race ,gender , sexuality ...I don't care . At the end of the day there's something questionable about a grown adult who's known a little kid and then sleeps with them when they're only what 15 ??!. But yeah the tabloids are definitely enjoying this .

[bots]

the kid will give his story to the media at some point

[GoldHeart]

Also the scandal is bigger as Schofield was married with kids , he basically lived a lie for all those years aswell.

And what must his wife and kids be thinking to all this now .

[Zizu]

I know you don't want to hear this Zizu ....but I think that also applies to Holly. But I agree that Holmes is a hypocrite likely. I think anyone who initially stood by Schofield...are now doing damage control to save their own careers.


Fair comment although maybe Holly has more reason to feel let down by Schofield than most ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

the kid will give his story to the media at some point



Sure
once, one of them pays enough

[GoldHeart]

Fair comment although maybe Holly has more reason to feel let down by Schofield than most ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Well she was the closest to him .

[Cherie]

whats the deal with the NDA coming to an end, I thought those things were forever?

[bots]

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get

[bots]

whats the deal with the NDA coming to an end, I thought those things were forever?

it depends. They don't just hand them out without there being some terms attached. A time limit may have been put on it if their justification was time based

[Zizu]

Well she was the closest to him .


Hence why she may/will feel more aggrieved that many others ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

As far as I know, NDAs don't cover crimes?

[Zizu]

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get


So does that stand for all the rock bands , pop singers and Rap artists over the last 60 years ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

if Holly didn't know what was going on she is the most naive tv presenter out there at the moment. Personally, i think she kept her mouth shut as the show was her golden egg and she only started to show discontent when family/friends started asking her serious questions

[bots]

So does that stand for all the rock bands , pop singers and Rap artists over the last 60 years ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

of course it does and if you look in the news you will see a lot of high profile rock stars and celebs are getting their just rewards now

[user104658]

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

Funny that - I've also only seen "internet weirdos" trying to argue that noncery-with-a-loophole is all A-OK. (prep 'em young then wait for them to "come of age" before pulling the trigger - legal!)

Most actual people in the real world recognise that 50 year old men befriending 10 year olds and then ****ing them in their late teens is an absolute shambles.

[Kazanne]

his wife divorced him didn't she?

No idea Bots,as i say im not too well up on it.

[Kazanne]

No wife and kids are accepting of a man in his 50s shagging a 16 year old boy that he groomed from age 10

having sex with a kid that is 6 years younger than his youngest daughter

:umm2:

Was he shagging him ? I didnt know that,and LT youde be surprisd what some women would put up with.

[Liam-]

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with? :joker:

[Zizu]

of course it does and if you look in the news you will see a lot of high profile rock stars and celebs are getting their just rewards now


Bill Wyman ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with? :joker:

i'm glad it amuses you so much, a bit sick for my taste but each to their own

[Liam-]

I’m laughing at the absurdity of your ridiculous statement

[Beso]

I’m laughing at the absurdity of your ridiculous statement

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

[Glenn.]

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

All made up in your own perverted head.

[Beso]

All made up in your own perverted head.

Its simps like you that turn a blind eye because the subject is to shocking that facilitate this.

[Kate!]

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

Great Post Parm. You've expressed just how I feel too.

[Kate!]

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with? :joker:

All made up in your own perverted head.

There is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. Then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

[arista]

Once one Press Group
pays the lad
the shocking truth will
be out.

[Kate!]

Once one Press Group
pays the lad
the shocking truth will
be out.

Maybe as soon as tomorrow

[GoldHeart]

There is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. Then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

Exactly

[Crimson Dynamo]

there is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

no, as soon as he turns 16...:skull:

[arista]

Maybe as soon as tomorrow


Sadly
Not Yet.

[Vanessa]

There are pictures of them leaving a hotel. And the lad was 15 at the time.
It's illegal and quite frankly disgusting. He was a child.
Would you be happy with it if it was your own child? Don't think so.

[Cherie]

There are pictures of them leaving a hotel. And the lad was 15 at the time.
It's illegal and quite frankly disgusting. He was a child.
Would you be happy with it if it was your own child? Don't think so.

apparently they would be delighted if some 50 year old was fiddling with their kids as long as the kid was 'legal' grim stuff

[UserSince2005]

It is foul he pre ordered that child and within day of him turning in 18 he is open pursing him. It’s just gross. Dirty pig.

[Beso]

It is foul he pre ordered that child and within day of him turning in 18 he is open pursing him. It’s just gross. Dirty pig.

He also dumped him soon after he had his wicked way.

[Crimson Dynamo]

MM has now denied ITV quizzed him about Philth

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12134257/ITV-crisis-deepens-Schofields-ex-lover-denies-bosses-quizzed-unwise-affair.html

oh dear..

[thesheriff443]

So Phil was funded lawyers for mm but last Monday he refused to deny the affair between them any longer

Hence phils confession

[thesheriff443]

In 2020 at a tv awards show mm expressed his love for phil and a lot of people knew about it
He had an outburst with phil and holly afterwards he was moved from this morning to another itv program

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-3510326c-1129-461a-adfb-8d92c45626ca.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-a2942bfb-c848-4bce-9b7a-558fd6ef996a.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-633bf7b5-8cbf-4042-910f-ba9eae1a9c87.png

[Mystic Mock]

So does that stand for all the rock bands , pop singers and Rap artists over the last 60 years ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Of course.

Just because they make good Music doesn't mean that they should be above the law.

[Cherie]

MM has now denied ITV quizzed him about Philth

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12134257/ITV-crisis-deepens-Schofields-ex-lover-denies-bosses-quizzed-unwise-affair.html

oh dear..

well then....the only reason this has all blown up is because of the brothers conviction... they brushed it under the carpet in 2020 because they didn't want to lose their 'star'

The whole team should step down

[arista]

Radio 5 also Simulcast on BBCnewsHD

Wasting one hour
on Phillip.

And are asking are you going to watch it?


BBC Radio 5 - Pathetic, today

[joeysteele]

Radio 5 also Simulcast on BBCnewsHD

Wasting one hour
on Phillip.

And are asking are you going to watch it?


BBC Radio 5 - Pathetic, today

I think it's mostly pathetic most days arista.:joker:
Too much time on one topic is the issue for me.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I mean talk about ego. he is responsible for it all with his lies

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/29/09/71523837-12135681-image-a-1_1685349233640.jpg

[user104658]

I mean talk about ego. he is responsible for it all with his lies

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/29/09/71523837-12135681-image-a-1_1685349233640.jpg

"I'm so sorry I ruined it all by having sex with that wee teenage boy. It was LEGAL tho." - I'm assuming that was at the bottom and cut off.

[Crimson Dynamo]

"I'm so sorry I ruined it all by having sex with that wee teenage boy. It was LEGAL tho." - I'm assuming that was at the bottom and cut off.

:joker:

[bots]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-633bf7b5-8cbf-4042-910f-ba9eae1a9c87.png

fired because he tried to blow Phil's boy

[Glenn.]

Still waiting for these reports of sexual abuse and grooming

[user104658]

Still waiting for these reports of sexual abuse and grooming

You're opinion is that it's fine so long as its legal so you're waiting for is reports of a crime, when people have repeatedly told you that their opinion on his behaviour has nothing to do with whether or not it's "technically legal".

No one is really interested in your justification of noncery-with-loopholes Glenn, you're fighting an uphill battle, and "Nowt wrong with men in their 50's pursuing teenage boys they met as children" stance is an extremely odd hill to die on.

[arista]

Still waiting for these reports of sexual abuse and grooming


Yes, that could be a arrest
soon.

[arista]

Glenn,
it started many years back

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxK0xY6WcAENab7?format=jpg&name=small

[user104658]

Glenn,
it started many years back

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxK0xY6WcAENab7?format=jpg&name=small

Glenn's stance is that it's OK to plant seeds in young lads so long as you wait until the fruit is ripe before you stick your cock in it. It's legal arista. Legal.

[rusticgal]

You're opinion is that it's fine so long as its legal so you're waiting for is reports of a crime, when people have repeatedly told you that their opinion on his behaviour has nothing to do with whether or not it's "technically legal".

No one is really interested in your justification of noncery-with-loopholes Glenn, you're fighting an uphill battle, and "Nowt wrong with men in their 50's pursuing teenage boys they met as children" stance is an extremely odd hill to die on.


:clap2:

[thesheriff443]

Eamon homes has bit back at phils insta post

[arista]

Eamon Holmes has bit back at phils insta post


Yes, saying he is Delusional

[bots]

phil can no longer do the fingers in ears, i'm superior role anymore and that penny has yet to drop

[Liam-]

At least now we’ve confirmed that people are don’t care whether he actually broke the law or not and are just gonna accuse him of things anyway, yet people waiting for any actual allegations to come forward before judging are irrational

[bots]

The people now speaking out have probably been bottling it up for up to 20 years, so it's hardly a surprise they can't wait to stick the boot in :laugh:

[Glenn.]

At least now we’ve confirmed that people are don’t care whether he actually broke the law or not and are just gonna accuse him of things anyway, yet people waiting for any actual allegations to come forward before judging are irrational

.

[Zizu]

Eamon homes has bit back at phils insta post


This guy claims everyone knew about his tendencies … and yet HE along with everyone else did nothing .,

Maybe they should start hounding Eamon Holmes now and demanding to know why he didn’t raise the issue ..

He’s just like JSP and EsRan … they also knew ‘things’ but kept quiet as and yet they all love a good rant when it suits them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/29/10/71525523-0-image-m-42_1685353596505.jpg


how nice

[Zizu]

Glenn,
it started many years back

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxK0xY6WcAENab7?format=jpg&name=small


Maybe ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[AnnieK]

At least now we’ve confirmed that people are don’t care whether he actually broke the law or not and are just gonna accuse him of things anyway, yet people waiting for any actual allegations to come forward before judging are irrational

Its legality v morality though to be honest.

I'm not liking the nonce label bandied about so easily but I would be out for blood if a much older family friend suddenly decided to have a sexual reltionship with my son after knowing him since a child. I'd be raising some very serious concerns about their intentions during his childhood

[user104658]

At least now we’ve confirmed that people are don’t care whether he actually broke the law or not and are just gonna accuse him of things anyway, yet people waiting for any actual allegations to come forward before judging are irrational

Its not accusing him of things, it's the things he's actually admitted to. And not judging him for those things isn't "irrational" but it is, to be honest, quite concerning.

I'll judge him much more harshly if allegations of an actual crime come out but it's unnecessary in terms of how I feel about him and what he's done based on the verified facts -- the things he's admitted to quite openly. I have literally no need to wait for more information before forming that opinion. It's based on already established information, nothing baseless.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Maybe sooner ??https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230529/ed99431f6728c25263152f3d4bd2dc06.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

all perfectly normal and legal

nothing to see here


:whistle:

[Niamh.]

Its legality v morality though to be honest.

I'm not liking the nonce label bandied about so easily but I would be out for blood if a much older family friend suddenly decided to have a sexual reltionship with my son after knowing him since a child. I'd be raising some very serious concerns about their intentions during his childhood

As would 90% of parents no doubt. It's grooming and it's creepy. And it's not "just because he's gay" there's plenty of straight men who are paedophiles or borderline as well, I think they should ALL be called out.

[user104658]

Its legality v morality though to be honest.

I'm not liking the nonce label bandied about so easily but I would be out for blood if a much older family friend suddenly decided to have a sexual reltionship with my son after knowing him since a child. I'd be raising some very serious concerns about their intentions during his childhood

It falls quite firmly within the definition of grooming - he formed a relationship with him when he was a child, the fact that it wasn't sexual until legal age isn't relevant at all to that. Grooming is a descriptor of a behaviour, it's not a legal definition.

I think what (perhaps, being charitable) is happening is that people are conflating it with simple "big age gap" relationships which are quite different. I personally still find them a bit problematic when the younger person is VERY young (e.g. Leo and his conveyor belt of 20 year olds) but in those cases it's just a bit sad/personally gross. Its how far back the relationship goes that's the issue. If MM had simply joined ITV at 18 and met Philip then that would be one thing - but that's not the situation or even close. He's been in clear regular contact with him since he was a child. That's an absolutely massive red flag.

[user104658]

As would 90% of parents no doubt. It's grooming and it's creepy. And it's not "just because he's gay" there's plenty of straight men who are paedophiles or borderline as well, I think they should ALL be called out.

I think there's extra defensiveness over it because he's gay but it's nothing to do with that, the situation would be exactly the same if he was straight and this was a girl, and (I have to say) I thi k some of the people who are saying this is fine would be more willing to see how dodgy it is if it WAS a young girl.

I also think in some ways it would be worse for a girl because I think ultimately MM will do fine career-wise despite all of this. I think if it was a female, they'd have the same sympathy, but basically be tarred for life.

[user104658]

Can you IMAGINE the reaction if Piers Morgan had met a 10 year old through ITV, slid into her DM's at 15 and started a sexual relationship with her at 16-18?

Please Liam and Glenn, please try to argue that you'd take a "wait and see if he broke the law before judging" approach if that was the situation.

I think it's fairly obvious that you'd be all over it as soon as there was a sniff of inappropriate behaviour.

You both PROVABLY have no problem calling out Prince Andrew for his actions with teenage girls.

Why are you picking up the shields and going on the march for Philip?

[GiRTh]

The fact that Scofes statement was so carefully worded shows he'e legally covering himself too. He made a point of saying the relationship was 'consensual' Its never good when that word is used.

He also states that was 'Unwise but not illegal'. There was no denial in his statement.

It creepy for a middle aged person to start a relationship with someone they've known as a child.

[Niamh.]

The fact that Scofes statement was so carefully worded shows he'e legally covering himself too. He made a point of saying the relationship was 'consensual' Its never good when that word is used.

He also states that was 'Unwise but not illegal'. There was no denial in his statement.

It creepy for a middle aged person to start a relationship with someone they've known as a child.

Of course it is, everyone knows that, I don't believe anyone who says it's not.

[Crimson Dynamo]

oop

https://twitter.com/EamonnHolmes/status/1663125996231356416?s=20

[user104658]

"Pip" :joker: that's the real fightin' talk. That's a burn.

[GiRTh]

Also, the fact Scofe has admitted to lying to so many people could leave him in legal trouble. He and Holly need to shut up.

[Swan]

At least now we’ve confirmed that people are don’t care whether he actually broke the law or not and are just gonna accuse him of things anyway, yet people waiting for any actual allegations to come forward before judging are irrational

Can you IMAGINE the reaction if Piers Morgan had met a 10 year old through ITV, slid into her DM's at 15 and started a sexual relationship with her at 16-18?

Please Liam and Glenn, please try to argue that you'd take a "wait and see if he broke the law before judging" approach if that was the situation.

I think it's fairly obvious that you'd be all over it as soon as there was a sniff of inappropriate behaviour.

You both PROVABLY have no problem calling out Prince Andrew for his actions with teenage girls.

Why are you picking up the shields and going on the march for Philip?

.

[user104658]

Also, the fact Scofe has admitted to lying to so many people could leave him in legal trouble. He and Holly need to shut up.

I think ITV would probably have grounds to sue him over the (let's face it) destruction of This Morning BUT I don't think they will. In terms of individuals, I don't know that he's actually slandered anyone, it's mostly just lies of omission.

[Oliver_W]

"Pip" :joker: that's the real fightin' talk. That's a burn.
Things certainly aren't looking so Great, Expectations are low ...

It creepy for a middle aged person to start a relationship with someone they've known as a child.
Sixteen is a child, and regardless of legality it's creepy for any middle aged person to start a relationship with a 16 year old.

[GiRTh]

I think ITV would probably have grounds to sue him over the (let's face it) destruction of This Morning BUT I don't think they will. In terms of individuals, I don't know that he's actually slandered anyone, it's mostly just lies of omission.I'm referring more to the admission of untruths. It would set a precedent if Mr McGreevy ever sues Schofield.

[GiRTh]

Things certainly aren't looking so Great, Expectations are low ...


Sixteen is a child, and regardless of legality it's creepy for any middle aged person to start a relationship with a 16 year old.True.

[Kate!]

I see neither Glenn nor Liam has responded to my post asking whether they'd approve if they had a son of 18, sorry 16, who someone in their 50s had taken an unhealthy interest in since they were 10 and furthermore would approve if said 50 year old began sleeping with them the minute it was legal. Disgusting. I think proof will emerge eventually of the alleged grooming. Like someone said the boy in question, Matthew, has yet to be offered money fir his story.

[Alf]

Things certainly aren't looking so Great, Expectations are low ...


Sixteen is a child, and regardless of legality it's creepy for any middle aged person to start a relationship with a 16 year old.I spotted what you did there.

[user104658]

I see neither Glenn nor Liam has responded to my post asking whether they'd approve if they had a son of 18, sorry 16, who someone in their 50s had taken an unhealthy interest in since they were 10 and furthermore would approve if said 50 year old began sleeping with them the minute it was legal. Disgusting. I think proof will emerge eventually of the alleged grooming. Like someone said the boy in question, Matthew, has yet to be offered money fir his story.

They'll just say "yes" to a hypothetical Kate. They don't have kids, and are too young to imagine having a teenager regardless.

But this is where we'll start getting into the whole chip-on-shoulder silly lark of "Actually you don't need to have kids or any experience of kids to know all about having kids, I once looked after my cousin's hamster!"

[bots]

there isn't a media outlet in the uk that will ever employ him again. He didn't step down from ITV, he was fired

[Glenn.]

I didn’t respond to her because she’s on ignore…

There’s no proof he groomed him, just everyone’s warped opinion. If it ever emerges that he did groom him then we’ll discuss it.

Not interested in make believe hyper-theoreticals.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I didn’t respond to her because she’s on ignore…

There’s no proof he groomed him, just everyone’s warped opinion. If it ever emerges that he did groom him then we’ll discuss it.

Not interested in make believe hyper-theoreticals.

and what is your understanding of grooming?

[Kate!]

and what is your understanding of grooming?

Grooming infers taking an unhealthy interest in a much much younger child with a view to having sex with them at the earliest legal opportunity. Oh wait....that's what he did. Silly me. Glenn talks utter bollocks.

[bots]

i wonder what Phill's justification was to ITV for them to employ the guy. That could easily be his big mistake

[Oliver_W]

i wonder what Phill's justification was to ITV for them to employ the guy. That could easily be his big mistake

Meh, plenty of people have nephews and nieces, or kids-of-friends for whom they'd do a favour. "Hire this kid" probably wouldn't get much of a second thought.

[Liam-]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise

[Glenn.]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise

:clap1:

[smudgie]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise

Agree with this.
Will be interesting to see what MM has to say about it, and how he feels.
As for all his “friends” turning their back on him and distancing themselves, well they weren’t really friends.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Agree with this.
Will be interesting to see what MM has to say about it, and how he feels.
As for all his “friends” turning their back on him and distancing themselves, well they weren’t really friends.

no one likes to be lied to time and time again

an actual friend would never do that

[Beso]

One things for certain....


Any teen will do....



Altogether now.

I walked alone....ta da Dee da da.

[Beso]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise




How lucky for phillip his chosen one turned out to be the gay one.:joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Early last week Schofield decided to spend an eye-watering sum on legal
representation for his former lover. As it transpired it was this that sealed his
fate.

Schofield hired top London law firm Mishcon de Reya to act for the man, now in
his mid-20s, and his own solicitor, then set up a call with Mishcon's head of
reputation management in an attempt to put a plan in motion to manage press
interest.

But it is what happened next that has almost certainly finished the £20
million former king of daytime television's career for good. Schofield learned
that his former partner was not prepared to lie about their affair.

He instead told his lawyer that they had had a relationship, and that was to
be his honest stance. He added that he was simply fed up lying. Schofield
had no way out.

He was then forced into a U-turn, telling his management company YMU,
which had represented him for 35 years, that he had lied and that he had
indeed cheated on his wife with the young man.

YMU – widely seen as the most powerful showbusiness agency in the UK –
swiftly dropped him and told ITV bosses of his confession.

Schofield then sent the grovelling apology to me, on Friday, admitting that he
had lied to this newspaper. He also announced he had quit ITV with
immediate effect, and would not be presenting next Saturday's British Soap
Awards – a role that has been his since 2006.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12132035/He-declared-love-Phil-glitzy-awards-ceremony-got-shunted-show.html

nothing to see here :whistle:

[Glenn.]

We know he had an affair…

[arista]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise



Utter Bollocks
Slick Liam

We have not got what we Want at all.......


Many of us want Phillip in Jail

[arista]

[and would not be presenting next Saturday's British Soap
Awards – a role that has been his since 2006.]


Utter Bliss

[Liam-]

Utter Bollocks
Slick Liam

We have not got what we Want at all.......


Many of us want Phillip in Jail

Well without evidence or an allegation, you’re out of luck aren’t you

[Liam-]

We know he had an affair…

And he’s already payed a higher price for it than the vast majority of straight people in showbiz who have affairs

[Kate!]

Morally they should throw away the key. And Glenn can ignore me all he wants but he won't answer my question. Because he's in the wrong.

Unfortunately no there is no current evidence but that could change.

Let's see you eat your words then.

[arista]

Well without evidence or an allegation, you’re out of luck aren’t you


Once

Matt goes to the Money Deal
it will come into Every Front Page
Phillip Schofield Arrested.


Justice then done

[Kate!]

We know he had an affair…

And he lied.

[GiRTh]

Or, he could have just gotten a student from a school he was a patron of, an opportunity for a job interview and then when said person started working there as an adult, unwisely had an affair with them, which is the more likely scenario at this time, because there is zero evidence to point to grooming or abuse, you can all carry on calling people names and clutching your pearls however much you want, but accusations of serious crimes like he’s being accused of, needs evidence or an actual allegation, neither of which exist right now.

Is the whole thing weird? Absolutely, should he have done it? Absolutely not, but applying terms to people without any evidence is proven to be dangerous, he’s lost his job, he’s lost his management, he probably won’t work again, people have got what they wanted, so until an actual allegation appears, the rest is really all just noise

The pearl clutching is appropriate when a 50 year old married TV star has an affair with someone they have known since they were child. Its ill advised at best.

True, and IMO its unlikely any criminal charges will be filed. There have been no actual crime reported but both Schofield and McGreevy have admitted to lying about the affair. There may be civil charges in the future.

[Kate!]

Once

Matt goes to the Money Deal
it will come into Every Front Page
Phillip Schofield Arrested.


Justice then done

Yes Arista!