Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
..no I don't believe that either really, it's too much conspiracy but there are still some things that don't make sense to me either/that don't seem to fit...the police surely must have planted her car and directed the search ..a 40 acre land property and it took 30 minutes to find it...and also the police officer who knew the car model, when he wasn't meant to have seen it...(he looked so uncomfortable there in court..)...so the police must have planted the car first before the killer planted the body, so the killer maybe not have been intending to make it look like Avery at first but then did when the car was found...but also if the police were going to 'plant', why didn't they plant all of the evidence originally because other 'evidence' was the found so much later than the body was found...
..anyways, the judge is really suspicious in throwing all of the defence things out but allowing most of the prosecution and the convenience of all of the 'ruined' evidence that was so, so important...(I'm going to try to watch some more soon and the I'll be back with my next conspiracy theory..)....
|
I posted this theory I found online on the first page, but it kind of addresses some of those questions you had
Theory #1: Scott Tadych (Avery’s brother-in-law) and Bobby Dassey (Avery’s nephew and Brendan Dassey’s brother) killed Halbach (purposefully or accidentally) and framed Avery for the crime … and then sat back and watched as the Manitowoc County Sheriff’s Department separately did the same.
Evidence: The amount of evidence found on the Avery property — including Halbach’s remains and her car – has led many to surmise that if Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey are innocent, the real killer would still likely be someone who had similar access and opportunity, both to Halbach herself and the Avery property. A number of other Avery family members also lived on the property at the time, including Tadych, Janda and all four of the Dassey boys. It was Janda’s car that Halbach came to photograph for Auto Trader magazine, and Tadych more than likely was privy to her visit. Bobby Dassey testified to seeing Halbach taking pictures of his mother’s car, and both men had access to the various locations where evidence was found. Neither was fingerprinted or submitted DNA, and the trailer where they lived was not searched, so there’s no way of knowing if there was evidence linking them to Halbach’s murder, because they were not investigated.
Other Evidence: Bobby is believed to be Tadych’s accomplice in this theory, based on the fact that the pair conveniently alibi each other for the time of the murder. Both claimed to have gone hunting that afternoon/evening, but not together, and said they passed each other on the highway during the window of time Halbach is believed to have been killed – but there are no other witnesses to offer further corroboration.
Tadych, meanwhile, has a long history of being violent towards women, and showed a strange level of enthusiasm for his brother-in-law’s conviction (he called it “the best thing in the world ever”) despite knowing his step son, Brendan, was facing similar charges. Meanwhile, Bobby Dassey’s testimony at trial had notable inconsistencies and misleading statements, and an unrelated examination the same week as the murder reportedly revealed that Bobby had scratches on his back. Additionally, shortly after Halbach’s death, a coworker of Tadych’s claimed that he was trying to sell a .22 rifle, the same as the gun believed to be the murder weapon, which he said belonged “to one of the Dassey boys.”
__________________