[arista]

[ThomasC]

Yes, but it shouldn't be called porn education.

[arista]

Originally Posted by ThomasC

Yes, but it shouldn't be called porn education.

Yes
thats what the panel said.

[GoldHeart]

There's so many things WRONG with that title "Porn & children", should NEVER be put together EVER .

But there has to be a broader spectrum on sex education and lessons , when i was at school everything was described so basic and mechanical .

Everyone gets taught birth control and the medical aspect of sex and how the male and female body works . But there was never any important discussions about the emotional side or the consent side to it all ,which should have been a vital part.

[arista]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

There's so many things WRONG with that title "Porn & children", should NEVER be put together EVER .

But there has to be a broader spectrum on sex education and lessons , when i was at school everything was described so basic and mechanical .

Everyone gets taught birth control and the medical aspect of sex and how the male and female body works . But there was never any important discussions about the emotional side or the consent side to it all ,which should have been a vital part.

They need a video of 16 year olds
having sex.

[ThomasC]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Here's a wild, crazy, out-there idea:

How about ALL porn should cut out the violence, abuse and make it clear that true, comfortable, informed consent is vital and if sites don't do that, they get shut down entirely. We don't need "special porn that promotes consent" that's just aimed at young people FFS it should be a requirement if it's going to be made AT ALL.

Violence? in an ideal world, but some people have violence porn as a fetish, but it's still consenting.

Originally Posted by arista

They need a video of 14 to 16 year olds
having sex.

Oh god, you didn't just say that?

That's rape to start with.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by ThomasC

Violence? in an ideal world, but some people have violence porn as a fetish, but it's still consenting.

Bull**** is it, 99.9% of it is "a grey area" of consent at best and most of the women who make these videos are already in a bad psychological state, and victims of historic abuse, BEFORE they get into the industry, and come out even worse. The reports from indistry insiders, ex-"performers" and the data is staggering and shameful and frankly anyone who gets their rocks off watching women being abused, and are going to start complaining that they can't get choking porn any more, can **** right off permanently. "Sex work liberal feminism" is misogyny in a frilly hat.

[ThomasC]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Bull**** is it, 99.9% of it is "a grey area" of consent at best and most of the women who make these videos are already in a bad psychological state, and victims of historic abuse, BEFORE they get into the industry, and come out even worse. The reports from indistry insiders, ex-"performers" and the data is staggering and shameful and frankly anyone who gets their rocks off watching women being abused, and are going to start complaining that they can't get choking porn any more, can **** right off permanently. "Sex work liberal feminism" is misogyny in a frilly hat.

It's not bull****.

Maybe you're just close minded?

Hence there being a submissive and dominant partner etc.

whips, chains, tying up etc. It can be a fetish to be controlled and dominated during sex.

I'm not saying all and you're looking at it from a professional sex worker position

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Bull**** is it, 99.9% of it is "a grey area" of consent at best and most of the women who make these videos are already in a bad psychological state, and victims of historic abuse, BEFORE they get into the industry, and come out even worse. The reports from indistry insiders, ex-"performers" and the data is staggering and shameful and frankly anyone who gets their rocks off watching women being abused, and are going to start complaining that they can't get choking porn any more, can **** right off permanently. "Sex work liberal feminism" is misogyny in a frilly hat.

Imo if the Actresses consent to doing the work then I don't see the issue.

Obviously the industry does need to clean up it's act when it comes to abuse behind the scenes though.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

They need a video of 14 to 16 year olds
having sex.

No they don’t

[bots]

Originally Posted by arista

They need a video of 14 to 16 year olds
having sex.

Arista's middle name is "glitter"

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Arista's middle name is "glitter"

Yes Bad example
Gary Glitter former pop star, now Paedophile.



No one wants to be in his Gang.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by arista

They need a video of 14 to 16 year olds
having sex.

FFS arista even for you this is next level.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

FFS arista even for you this is next level.

Kids are watching Porn on their phones
How would you do this new Education plan TS?

[ThomasC]

Originally Posted by arista

Kids are watching Porn on their phones
How would you do this new Education plan TS?

Yes, but not of 14 and 15 year old children.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by arista

Kids are watching Porn on their phones
How would you do this new Education plan TS?

So you think the solution is kiddie porn?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by arista

They need a video of 16 year olds
having sex.

[user104658]

Here's a wild, crazy, out-there idea:

How about ALL porn should cut out the violence, abuse and make it clear that true, comfortable, informed consent is vital and if sites don't do that, they get shut down entirely. We don't need "special porn that promotes consent" that's just aimed at young people FFS it should be a requirement if it's going to be made AT ALL.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Here's a wild, crazy, out-there idea:

How about ALL porn should cut out the violence, abuse and make it clear that true, comfortable, informed consent is vital and if sites don't do that, they get shut down entirely. We don't need "special porn that promotes consent" that's just aimed at young people FFS it should be a requirement if it's going to be made AT ALL.

Absolutely

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Here's a wild, crazy, out-there idea:

How about ALL porn should cut out the violence, abuse and make it clear that true, comfortable, informed consent is vital and if sites don't do that, they get shut down entirely. We don't need "special porn that promotes consent" that's just aimed at young people FFS it should be a requirement if it's going to be made AT ALL.

What's wrong with Violent Porn?!

Seriously this idea is warped from whoever has come up with this idea.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Here's a wild, crazy, out-there idea:

How about ALL porn should cut out the violence, abuse and make it clear that true, comfortable, informed consent is vital and if sites don't do that, they get shut down entirely. We don't need "special porn that promotes consent" that's just aimed at young people FFS it should be a requirement if it's going to be made AT ALL.

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk

Clap all you want, but if half off tibb has to miss out on a good old fisting, dont you come running to me when the reports come flooding on from their bottom filling fingers.

[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

"Oh god, you didn't just say that?

That's rape to start with."


No its Consensual Sex , Thomas

Which is legal for 16 year olds in the UK

[ThomasC]

Originally Posted by arista

"Oh god, you didn't just say that?

That's rape to start with."


No its Consensual Sex , Thomas

Which is legal for 16 year olds in the UK

Yes, 16, you said 14-16 year old having sex.

14 and 15 is illegal.