FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tech, Movies & Video Games Discuss technology, movies and video games here. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I recently did a review on this old 1990 mini-series for Youtube that can be found here:
And it got me re-watching it. I was a big, big fan of the original 1986 novel and this just does a poor execution of it. I blame the Director. But anyhow, there's a remake coming out soon with the guy who wrote "The Invasion" penning the script. It's also supposed to be updated to take place in 2010 and having the flashbacks in the 1980s. Anyone else a fan of the book, original mini-series or just looking forward to the new film coming out soon? Last edited by Chilltown; 18-08-2010 at 04:35 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
V.I.P
|
It isn't as scary as everyone makes out, the end is complete bull.
I mean turning into a spider? Pathetic dull ending IMO. It started off great and slowly went downhill as the movie went on.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
For once, (other than our shared Marcus adoration), I do have to agree with you. I think most Stephen King books have weak endings but it's really evident here and the director doesn't help that at all.
Personally, I think it just suffers due to age mostly. Tim Curry was fine as Pennywise and a lot of people who find it 'scary' saw it when they were younger - so that could explain the mass appeal. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
REVIVAL
|
This
__________________
WALK ON WATER
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Time's done it no favours really, Only Pennywise really remains creepy. I heard they were gonna remake it and stick closer to the book but that was a few years back.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The novel is one of the greatest ever written, in any genre.
No movie adaptation will ever do it justice, as it would have to be about 5 hours long. The movie will just focus on the clown, there is a hell of a lot more to it than that though.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Too glam to give a damn
|
O.T: But I thought The Shining had a great ending.
Can't wait to see the remake of this though.
__________________
Last edited by Braden; 17-08-2010 at 04:00 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
Quote:
I enjoyed it when I was a kid, but saw it recently and didn't think much of it.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
It's an average movie at best. I don't have a phobia of clowns and that's probably the only reason why people thought it was scary. The spider was the lamest of lame and looked like something frrom a low budget 1980s film rather than the 90s
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
It was an early 90's TV miniseries though, in fairness the effects were never gonna stand the test of time.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
The effects weren't the problem, but the cliche characters and story and stilted acting.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Thanks, I plan on it. I had to replace the video though because Youtube removed it cause of the gangbang photochop.
![]() Anyhow, the acting is certainly not the best but I definitely do not think it's the actors faults. I think it's due to having a ****ty director behind the camera that the performances are so half-assed. On paper, the cast was pretty great for a TV movie. It was just poor production behind it. Also, I think most special effects other than say like...latex and make up, are due to be dated in time. CGI especially is the worst. I can't even begin to rant about how many movies from the late 1990's and early 2000's I used to love but are ruined now because of bad special effects. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|