FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: Which would you do? | ||||||
Kill the 12 year old relative - and save millions of lifes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 29.41% | |||
|
||||||
Let the 12 year old relative live, and the future of an end to poverty/cancer be uncertain |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 70.59% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Judas
|
A kind of similar question to the question I asked earlier on, based on the value of life. Although this situation is kind of opposite.
Would you kill a relative, for example, your 12 year old brother if you knew this loss of life would, hypothetically, put an end to cancer and global poverty? This one life lost would stop the death of millions in the future but would still be murder - to you is it worth it?
__________________
![]() JUDAS Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|