[_Seth]

should of > should have
would of > would have
could of > could have

The grammatically-challenged users will soon learn and it won't annoy some members (including me) when we read this Earth-shattering mistake of grammar when it comes up.

Sorry to be a pr!ck.

[Locke.]

No.

[Jack_]

Sounds like a good idea to me

[Stacey.]

No *wants to correct people's bad english*

[_Seth]

Originally Posted by Harry!

We have been waiting for a new forum skin form skin for ages....

adding these to the censorship is much easier.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Stacey.

No *wants to correct people's bad english*

Actually, I've changed my mind, and I agree.

*English hehe

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Actually, I've changed my mind, and I agree.

*English hehe

That shouldn't even be caps

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Stacey.

That shouldn't even be caps

It's a nationality boo, it should

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It's a nationality boo, it should

Oh yeah :'(

But that wasn't the context you were using it in

[Shaun]

I approve of this.

And if I see one more apostrophe in a plural in Novo's posts I'm going to sacrifice a Rangers fan.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Shaun

I approve of this.

And if I see one more apostrophe in a plural in Novo's posts I'm going to sacrifice a Rangers fan.

[Locke.]

Originally Posted by Shaun

I approve of this.

And if I see one more apostrophe in a plural in Novo's posts I'm going to sacrifice a Rangers fan.

- hopes it's firewire -

[Harry!]

We have been waiting for a new forum skin form skin for ages....

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Harry!

We have been waiting for a new foreskin for ages....

wut

[Harry!]

Originally Posted by Chewy

wut

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Chewy

wut

[Stacey.]

I'd rather have a new forum skin than censoring things like this.

[_Seth]

Originally Posted by Stacey.

I'd rather have a new forum skin than censoring things like this.

yeah but it'd take two minutes to do this censorship.

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Phlip

yeah but it'd take two minutes to do this censorship.

But there's no point, a skin's a way better addition to the forum.

[_Seth]

Originally Posted by Shaun

I'm just wondering if there are any circumstances where 'should of' would be a correct form. The only example I can think would be something like:

"Yes, Lesley should of course be evicted."

but then again that should technically be:

"Yes, Lesley should, of course, be evicted."

of course could be censored to of course. lol maybe that'd work.

Originally Posted by Stacey.

But there's no point, a skin's a way better addition to the forum.

both can be added.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Stacey.

I'd rather have a new forum skin than censoring things like this.

This.

Stop complaining Phlip

You should OF PM'd an admin if its bothering you that much.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

lmao chewy

[Shaun]

I'm just wondering if there are any circumstances where 'should of' would be a correct form. The only example I can think would be something like:

"Yes, Lesley should of course be evicted."

but then again that should technically be:

"Yes, Lesley should, of course, be evicted."

[Locke.]

There is nothing wrong with writing things like should of, it is faster than writing it the other way.. An it's not like we're doing a test

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Locke.

There is nothing wrong with writing things like should of, it is faster than writing it the other way.. An it's not like we're doing a test

That's the most tenuous excuse for "I want to remain stupid" I've heard.