[MTVN]

Scott was more articulate with his and made better points but thought Luke S's was a lot funnier how he was rambling on about random stuff and going on about that book

So yeah, just judge it however

[Petershaw1984]

Scotts

[Locke.]

Luke's of course, definitely made more sense and made more of an impact to viewers around the Country.

[Shaun]

I prefer gameplayers but Scott made the better speech.

[Jordan.]

Luke >

Dozed off half way through Scotts.

[bbfan1991]

Scotts, although I prefer the concept of Lukes because BB is a gameshow and I am sick of this journey bull**** or being yourself because every single person in there has a gameplan to win the show.

[reece(:]

They both were awful to be honest

[joeysteele]

Luke S is my current favourite but Scott was amazing with his speech. Really good and it was a flowing speech too.

[Jamie585]

Scott was dull, Luke s was funny :P but every one is saying how he has a massive game plan now, but he didn't chose that category did he? he was given it with no choice!

[Sophiee]

I agreed with scott's points more, but luke s put his points across much better and didn't do it in such a boring way.

[AshesonMars]

I preferred the content of Scott's speech, but I thought Luke S' approach was better. Luke S came across as quite personable and showed he had a sense of humour. I thought he came across really well and, even though he was obviously embarrassed, he is good at public speaking.

I liked Scott's speech and agreed with the content more than Luke S', but he was rather dull and I laughed at his hypocrisy. The guy's working-class and from Macclesfield, but talks with a fake late 17th century foppish accent.

[Niamh.]

Scotts but tbf to Luke he got the harder topic to speak about, it's always going to come across badly in there as none of them want to be seen as game players

[Patricia4]

Luke

[HBB1508]

Scott

[Kate!]

Scott

[Livia]

Scott, because although his grammar is a bit iffy, he is quite eloquent and has a much wider vocabulary than Luke.