[Beso]

rachel liked chickpeas:sleep :

[VanessaFeltz.]

nothing they both sucked.

Lisa was robbed

[Macie Lightfoot]

They're both two of the best winners ever <3

[Nancy.]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

They're both two of the best winners ever <3

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Nancy Littlebottom

It's their opinion

[Headie]

One won BB9 and the other won BB16

[BENDERBOY]

Rachel was nice, dull but nIce, Chloe was nastily dull.

[just thinkin]

wasn't too gone on gilberta grape - she was too sweet to be wholesome

chloe on the other hand was completely natural - fun loving, cheerful, but showed her strong side when she had to. The best person to win this year - her or Harry.

[Black Dagger]

Rachel Rice was an absolute phenomenal human being that doesn't get the respect she rightly deserves. People seem to forget she was the only person that actually stood up to that grotesque beast that was Alexandra and put Luke firmly in place

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by _LucasMichael_

Rachel Rice was an absolute phenomenal human being that doesn't get the respect she rightly deserves. People seem to forget she was the only person that actually stood up to that grotesque beast that was Alexandra and put Luke firmly in place

Thank god someone else knows the truth.

This "Rachel never spoke her mind" thing is a complete and utter fabrication. As you say, she was one of the only people (the others being Stephanie and Kathreya) to actually speak up during Chipgate (despite obviously being intimidated by Alexandra), while most of the others were happy to just sit back in silence.

As for the comparison with Chloe, I don't see it at all. They're not even slightly similar.

[Patricia4]

Both bores.

[Trasadkel1]

Whether she was boring or not Rachel was actually just a lovely girl.

The same cannot be said about Chloe. I found no redeeming qualities in her at all. She was pretty much forced on us through good edits whilst a lot of the rest were getting slaughtered. A lot of the voters only watch the highlight shows and, this year more than any, they were very biased towards certain housemates in the edit, tasks etc. it's a case of "if your face fits".

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Trasadkel1

Whether she was boring or not Rachel was actually just a lovely girl.

The same cannot be said about Chloe. I found no redeeming qualities in her at all. She was pretty much forced on us through good edits whilst a lot of the rest were getting slaughtered. A lot of the voters only watch the highlight shows and, this year more than any, they were very biased towards certain housemates in the edit, tasks etc. it's a case of "if your face fits".

This for me.

Some really good observations and points you make here,I agree particularly, this last week we did have Chloe thrust on us in the highlights, all done in a positive light too.

[ThriceShy]

Rachel wasn't a lying criminal.

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Rachel wasn't a lying criminal.

Slander. She could use some of her winning to take you to court and be an even bigger cash winner.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by bananarama

Slander. She could use some of her winning to take you to court and be an even bigger cash winner.

Rachel could take me to court for saying she isn't a lying criminal?

[Iceman]

One had a lisp, the other didn't.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Eoin

One had a lisp, the other didn't.

which one cause i'm sure both them have, unless chloes is a cleft gob.

[Calderyon]

Rachel was the more entertaining, nicer and the prettier one, imo.

[bots]

I liked Rachel, Chloe i didn't

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by parmnion

rachel liked chickpeas:sleep :

They aren't even remotely alike as housemates. Chloe was her own woman, got stuck into all the tasks, argued her corner, viciously supported her friends, was liked by all the housemates, showed strength honesty and maturity. She didn't pretend to be anything she wasn't

Rachel sat on a fence in the happy happy house, smiling sweetly and for the most part hardly having any opinion on anything. This is possibly the first year in ages I liked the winner and was happy she won

[Beso]

Originally Posted by rionablue

They aren't even remotely alike as housemates. Chloe was her own woman, got stuck into all the tasks, argued her corner, viciously supported her friends, was liked by all the housemates, showed strength honesty and maturity. She didn't pretend to be anything she wasn't

Rachel sat on a fence in the happy happy house, smiling sweetly and for the most part hardly having any opinion on anything. This is possibly the first year in ages I liked the winner and was happy she won

how can you say chloe was her own woman when she was to scared to take the 20g because of how the others might have reacted, thats not being yourself!

Plus she needed dannys approval for everything she did.

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by parmnion

how can you say chloe was her own woman when she was to scared to take the 20g because of how the others might have reacted, thats not being yourself!

Plus she needed dannys approval for everything she did.

She never sat on the fence she DOES have a conscience. She argued her points and she certainly did not need Dannys approval she fought with him didn't she. My opinion only Parmy. You have yours. Peace

[waterhog]

i am right behind blue on this one - think eaxactly the same - how anyone can compare the 2 beats me.


have a good day blueyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

[Black Dagger]

~Confronting all of Alexandra, Luke, Bex and Jennifer is now construed as fence sitting~