[TomToWin]

I am all for this.

It is heartbreaking to see yet such an important medical issue.


yes/no?

[Niamh.]

For medical reason with no other viable alternative yes, for make up and stuff like that no

[smudgie]

Only for medical/drug testing, but not smoking related and definitely not for make up or toiletries.

[T*]

Absolutely not for cosmetics
It’s shameful

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Only for medical/drug testing, but not smoking related and definitely not for make up or toiletries.

.

[joeysteele]

I'd prefer no testing on animals.
Certainly no way just for cosmetics.

However for medical reasons,preferably with a controlled criteria,I can see at present a need.

[waterhog]

got to be done - to get where we are today it has to be done.

[Marsh.]

As long as the testing is restricted to vermin.

[DemolitionRed]

Medical yes, anything else no.

[Crimson Dynamo]

If yiu can't do it to a human then no to an animal. We are not more important.