[Amy Jade]

all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

[Beso]

If they didn't want to be in that lifestyle why would they want to continue working for the royals for certain things?

[Niamh.]

I would say I was baffled by it but I'm not at all, I can think of at least 3 reasons why

[Livia]

Hmmm not for me. I'm equally disinterested in them all. Andrew needs to get his arse over the the States and answer any question they ask him. If he doesn't he's guilty...that's what it'll look like, and I can't see any other reason not to face the music.

Meghan's been part of the royal family for just a couple of years. She married Harry, one of everyone's royal favourites. Everyone remembers the little boy walking behind his Mum's coffin and I think we all took him under our wing. Meghan arrives and Harry's personality seemed to change. Now they don't want to be part of the royal family any more, they don't want to take part in royal duties... but they DO want to keep the brand "Sussex Royal", even though neither of them is now an HRH. It's going to include clothes designed by Meghan, apparently. I don't need a TV actress from California to tell me how to dress and I don't need her to tell me how to save the world.

I'd be happy if all three of them disappeared from public life now.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by parmnion

If they didn't want to be in that lifestyle why would they want to continue working for the royals for certain things?

if you mean charity work then presumably because it's one of the things they enjoy about being in the royal family. they are both clearly very passionate about certain organisations they help

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

if you mean charity work then presumably because it's one of the things they enjoy about being in the royal family. they are both clearly very passionate about certain organisations they help

When you say "help", AJ... they travel first class and get their picture taken. Now I know it's great that they use their fame to raise important issues, but please don't ask me to believe that what they do is "work". It's just privileged people on a jolly.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Livia

When you say "help", AJ... they travel first class and get their picture taken. Now I know it's great that they use their fame to raise important issues, but please don't ask me to believe that what they do is "work". It's just privileged people on a jolly.

well I'm not denying mistakes were made around that situation, however the fact the replies here so far have been heavily negative of meghan while prince andrew the peado is not spoken of speaks volumes.

the charity I know meghan is a patron of and still will be is a dogs home in london btw

[thesheriff443]

Epstein is dead and will not face justice,but claims against his fortune will be made.

Can anyone see prince Andrew going to prison for these allegations against him?

People are not interested in this case or Andrew.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

Hmmm not for me. I'm equally disinterested in them all. Andrew needs to get his arse over the the States and answer any question they ask him. If he doesn't he's guilty...that's what it'll look like, and I can't see any other reason not to face the music.

Meghan's been part of the royal family for just a couple of years. She married Harry, one of everyone's royal favourites. Everyone remembers the little boy walking behind his Mum's coffin and I think we all took him under our wing. Meghan arrives and Harry's personality seemed to change. Now they don't want to be part of the royal family any more, they don't want to take part in royal duties... but they DO want to keep the brand "Sussex Royal", even though neither of them is now an HRH. It's going to include clothes designed by Meghan, apparently. I don't need a TV actress from California to tell me how to dress and I don't need her to tell me how to save the world.

I'd be happy if all three of them disappeared from public life now.

How is designing a clothing line telling you how to dress? Will you be forced to buy it?

Unless you're Maria Von Trapp turning your nan's curtains into clothes, someone else is designing the clothing you wear and making it.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by arista

Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by arista

Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Are you surprised?

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Are you surprised?

Yes!

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

We don't actually know he did do that, yet.

But no, I certainly would be more angry towards a child molester than a preachy woman. And I'd be equally as angry at anybody who knew about it and covered it up.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

well I'm not denying mistakes were made around that situation, however the fact the replies here so far have been heavily negative of meghan while prince andrew the peado is not spoken of speaks volumes.

the charity I know meghan is a patron of and still will be is a dogs home in london btw

You say Prince Andrew is a paedo. But there is no evidence to prove that except a photo, allegedly of him with his arm around a young girl. The picture is a copy of a copy... as evidence, it's pretty thin. I'm not making excuses for him, I'm merely pointing out that there is no hard evidence. I do think he should be speaking to the US police, though.

I think the feelings people had about Meghan at first were quite different from what they are now. The press is despicable. But you can't say we didn't all know that. Who here even reads the tabloid press? And who doesn't take it with a huge pinch of salt.

We have her self-indulgent "why aren't people asking me how I am?" interview with Tom Bradby, but not much more, because despite the privileged life she stepped into, one that she had been repeatedly warned about by her own admission, she's not been happy with it from the start. Now they want out. Great. Go.... And leave your royal brand behind you if you're going to do nothing to earn it.

Just my opinion of course.

Originally Posted by Marsh.

How is designing a clothing line telling you how to dress? Will you be forced to buy it?

Unless you're Maria Von Trapp turning your nan's curtains into clothes, someone else is designing the clothing you wear and making it.

What I mean Marshy, is that she's not a designer, but she's going to be offering her clothes to women. Like her "style" is all her own. And you know, if she wants to do that, great! I hope it works out for her. But she wants to do it under the "Sussex Royal" brand. But she doesn't want to be part of the royal family. Seems a little... Machiavellian to me.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

Yes!

You are young.....but you will learn

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Are you surprised?

I'm pretty surprised. Unless TiBB has unearthed some evidence?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

Yes!

Don't be, it's the way it is but by all means keep calling it out, it helps

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

I'm pretty surprised. Unless TiBB has unearthed some evidence?

Ohhhhh sorry I forgot, it couldn't have been him because he was eating Pizza and not sweating at the time or something

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

Why would they do that? What would be the point? If we were talking about William, fair enough. But we're talking about Andrew. A minor royal, and not a very popular one.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Ohhhhh sorry I forgot, it couldn't have been him because he was eating Pizza and not sweating at the time or something

I don't know why you're making a joke here. I'm telling you there is no evidence. Do you think there is some? Forget the interview.... Evidence.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

I don't know why you're making a joke here. I'm telling you there is no evidence. Do you think there is some? Forget the interview.... Evidence.

Sorry your honour

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

You say Prince Andrew is a paedo. But there is no evidence to prove that except a photo, allegedly of him with his arm around a young girl. The picture is a copy of a copy... as evidence, it's pretty thin. I'm not making excuses for him, I'm merely pointing out that there is no hard evidence. I do think he should be speaking to the US police, though.

I think the feelings people had about Meghan at first were quite different from what they are now. The press is despicable. But you can't say we didn't all know that. Who here even reads the tabloid press? And who doesn't take it with a huge pinch of salt.

We have her self-indulgent "why aren't people asking me how I am?" interview with Tom Bradby, but not much more, because despite the privileged life she stepped into, one that she had been repeatedly warned about by her own admission, she's not been happy with it from the start. Now they want out. Great. Go.... And leave your royal brand behind you if you're going to do nothing to earn it.

Just my opinion of course.




What I mean Marshy, is that she's not a designer, but she's going to be offering her clothes to women. Like her "style" is all her own. And you know, if she wants to do that, great! I hope it works out for her. But she wants to do it under the "Sussex Royal" brand. But she doesn't want to be part of the royal family. Seems a little... Machiavellian to me.

See I think there's a difference between the official duties required of them to fulfil for the public/country and the titles/family name that they own/inherit that is theirs to do as they please. The names/titles are just that.