[Alf]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I hope you didn't mind, I though it was a typo but you used it a few times

Think Maxines trial will be interesting, where can we follow it?

Not at all. I remember Shaun once pointing out a spelling mistake I made once a few years back, I learnt from it and am now aware of it. I think it was "you're" when I was typing "your" I now know the difference in those words.

I probably did actually know how to spell trial, but I'm always capable of making errors, but now you've pointed it out I will think about it before typing it out.

Not sure if there will be any live coverage but if there is, I'll post a link.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Also unarmed people approached a racist with an automatic rifle,

They weren't unarmed.

One attacked him with a skateboard, another had a handgun. The paedo wasn't carrying a weapon, admittedly. But he had previously been brandishing and threatening people with a chain, and Rittenhouse thought that's what the paedo had when he attacked Rittenhouse for trying to put out a fire.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They weren't unarmed.

One attacked him with a skateboard, another had a handgun. The paedo wasn't carrying a weapon, admittedly. But he had previously been brandishing and threatening people with a chain, and Rittenhouse thought that's what the paedo had when he attacked Rittenhouse for trying to put out a fire.

Very Important facts.

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

'They weren't unarmed'

They were trying to disarm a murderer with an assault rifle.

They had no reason to disarm him, he didn't shoot anyone who didn't attack him first.

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

He went to a protest to stir up trouble and was brandishing an assault rifle. They had every reason to want to take a gun away from someone that looks like he's two steps away from shooting up a school.

He was trying to put out a fire when he was first attacked, I think it's clear the troublemakers of the riot were elsewhere.

[Liam-]

If someone opens fire and kills someone, they’re considered an active shooter, granted the first person he shot apparently lunged for his gun when it was pointed at him, whatever, if people didn’t see that starting altercation happen and just saw him shoot someone, those people that chased him, by the American law, were within their rights to try and apprehend an active shooter, what this verdict says to other wannabe private vigilantes is that you can get away with murder and the self defence laws only work one way.

And that’s why the judge through out the gun charge, because you can’t legally claim self defense if you’re into the process of committing a crime, which he was by being in possession of that gun, he was always going to get off, the entire thing was balanced in his favour from the beginning

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Liam-

And that’s why the judge through out the gun charge,

Why would it not get thrown out - the gun wasn't carried over state lines, and was of a legal type.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They had no reason to disarm him, he didn't shoot anyone who didn't attack him first.

He opened fire in a protest, you don't think people would be reactionary to that and immediately fear for their own safety? Did they not have a right to self defense?

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

He opened fire in a protest, you don't think people would be reactionary to that and immediately fear for their own safety? Did they not have a right to self defense?

He only "opened fire" at people who were attacking him though. He didn't spray bullets into a crowd or anything like that.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

[Christmas Dynasnow]

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

An assault rifle is not a defensive weapon, it can mow down a crowd of people and the rifle

And yet the only people he shot were in retaliation (and white). You'd think if he really was a racist murderer, a BLM riot would be a perfect opportunity to show how much of a racist murderer he was. But nope, not a single bullet left his gun, until he was attacked while trying to put out a fire left by the rioters.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Youtube video

Really nice kid

Thankfully he got good lawyers as the MSM went for him bad

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Youtube video

Really nice kid

Thankfully he got good lawyers as the MSM went for him bad

The MSM also gave a mauling to that kid who was doing wrong at all, but smirking while a weirdo banged a drum in his face a few years back, remember?

I wonder how the media chooses its targets for its hate campaigns...

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[Christmas Dynasnow]

this what we are dealing with on the extreme left...

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Youtube video