[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Redway I don't mean to be grim here but the strength difference between men and women can't and should not be overlooked.

The vast majority of physically-able adult men if going all out, can quite easily beat a woman or child to death with their bare hands. It can, and does, happen.

It is almost impossible for the average woman to beat an adult man to death (or even severe injury) with their bare hands. They'd have to at the very least be combat trained, and against a below average strength man.

Can a woman severely beat a man, yes, but it will essentially always have involved a blunt instrument, not fists.

There is no comparison and anyone suggesting g that the average adult male is not a clear physical threat to the average adult female is sadly completely wrong.

Exactly and it's not insulting to state that as a fact. We can't protect people who need protecting in certain circumstances if we're not honest. Saying men (generally speaking) are physically stronger than women is not a "put down" it's just the way it is, we're just built differently to accommodate procreation

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by DemRed

If its a chick with a dick... NO
If its a chick who no longer has a dick... YES

Originally Posted by smudgie

.

No penis allowed in ladies toilets.

.

Originally Posted by Redway

In 2024, why are we still saying “women and children”?

what do you suggest we call women and children Redway?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by cherie

.




What do you suggest we call women and children redway?

we're all waiting to find out

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Cherie

.




what do you suggest we call women and children Redway?

All I’m saying is we need to do less of this lumping women and children together business.

[Maru]

Originally Posted by Redway

All I’m saying is we need to do less of this lumping women and children together business.

I'm fine with being lumped. Lump me with my little bisquit, anytime.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Redway

All I’m saying is we need to do less of this lumping women and children together business.

Yeah Mums and their children should never be considered together

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Redway

All I’m saying is we need to do less of this lumping women and children together business.

Every woman who's commented, your target audience, feel like "women and children" is a necessary grouping. Listen and learn Redway

[Redway]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Yeah Mums and their children should never be considered together

That’s not what I said.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Redway

That’s not what I said.

You keep ignoring the women commenting though.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Redway

All I’m saying is we need to do less of this lumping women and children together business.

who would you lump the children with Redway, children need an adult, and usually that adult is an adult female, some males in the main **** off and leave the women and children to it, hence the single mother tag

[Mitchell]

Somewhere between 3 and 4

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

Somewhere between 3 and 4

Are you a woman?

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Redway I don't mean to be grim here but the strength difference between men and women can't and should not be overlooked.

The vast majority of physically-able adult men if going all out, can quite easily beat a woman or child to death with their bare hands. It can, and does, happen.

It is almost impossible for the average woman to beat an adult man to death (or even severe injury) with their bare hands. They'd have to at the very least be combat trained, and against a below average strength man.

Can a woman severely beat a man, yes, but it will essentially always have involved a blunt instrument, not fists.

There is no comparison and anyone suggesting g that the average adult male is not a clear physical threat to the average adult female is sadly completely wrong.

I'm unintentionally being called out in the BIB.

[Swan]

This is why men need women....They're the bosses in this vid. Redway, men need women, way more than women need men, and most men understand that!

Strong women shape strong men!

Youtube video

[Swan]

Btw, Cheesy as hell

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Swan

This is why men need women....They're the bosses in this vid. Redway, men need women, way more than women need men, and most men understand that!

Strong women shape strong men!

Youtube video

I'm going to come out with a boring answer, and say that I think that it depends on the individual man or woman.

I'm going to use two examples.

1. Anita Sarkeesian - She married herself last year, so she clearly isn't in a strong mind without a man imo.

2. Synthetic Man (YouTuber) - Someone needs to seriously find this weirdo a girlfriend, he is probably more demented than Anita.

Just look at any of these three videos if you don't believe me.

Youtube video

Youtube video

Youtube video

But obviously on the flip side, Hillary Clinton I think seems to be just a strong willed woman with or without Bill Clinton.

And Tyson Fury for the men just seems like he'd be the same with or without women being in his Boxing career.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Swan

Btw, Cheesy as hell

Too true.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Cherie

who would you lump the children with Redway, children need an adult, and usually that adult is an adult female, some males in the main **** off and leave the women and children to it, hence the single mother tag

Agreed.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

Somewhere between 3 and 4

(Cue the Family Guy reference): “oh, my God; you’re a woman? (Or are you a horse?)”

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by Redway

(Cue the Family Guy reference): “oh, my God; you’re a woman? (Or are you a horse?)”

Apologies. I only read the periodic text-boldening.

[Redway]

https://youtu.be/izJbgzP1tRA?si=48c3Guy1CtkmlM8H