FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Announcements / Suggestions / Help Announcements from Admin, member suggestions and forum help |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
should of > should have
would of > would have could of > could have The grammatically-challenged users will soon learn and it won't annoy some members (including me) when we read this Earth-shattering mistake of grammar when it comes up. Sorry to be a pr!ck. ![]()
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" Last edited by _Seth; 16-04-2011 at 07:09 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
No.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Sounds like a good idea to me
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
No *wants to correct people's bad english*
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
I approve of this.
And if I see one more apostrophe in a plural in Novo's posts I'm going to sacrifice a Rangers fan.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Frozen
|
We have been waiting for a new forum skin form skin for ages....
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
|
|||
Senior Moment
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
adding these to the censorship is much easier.
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Frozen
|
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
I'd rather have a new forum skin than censoring things like this.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
-
|
lmao chewy
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
yeah but it'd take two minutes to do this censorship.
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
I'm just wondering if there are any circumstances where 'should of' would be a correct form. The only example I can think would be something like:
"Yes, Lesley should of course be evicted." but then again that should technically be: "Yes, Lesley should, of course, be evicted."
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
There is nothing wrong with writing things like should of, it is faster than writing it the other way.. An it's not like we're doing a test
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
both can be added.
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
That's the most tenuous excuse for "I want to remain stupid" I've heard.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
<_<
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|