[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Yes I did so why are you saying that for?

Because the reply you gave didn't really correspond with what I actually said

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Because the reply you gave didn't really correspond with what I actually said

Well you was basically saying that it's not alright to mock disabled children yet you don't really complain on here when any other group gets mocked.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Livia

I guess that's better than being small penises, sheriff.............

in that case you will love my thread,
meet my penis.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Well you was basically saying that it's not alright to mock disabled children yet you don't really complain on here when any other group gets mocked.

No I didn't, I said, there's a difference between mocking disabled people in general and mocking a specific disabled child (Harvey)

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

No I didn't, I said, there's a difference between mocking disabled people in general and mocking a specific disabled child (Harvey)

the problem with that is,
harvey was put in the public domain by jordan!,if she was not such a desperate show biz hoar, she would do anything and use anyone to get more exposure.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

the problem with that is,
harvey was put in the public domain by jordan!,if she was not such a desperate show biz hoar, she would do any thing and use anyone to get more exposure.

Maybe so but that's not his fault, as far as I know every other comedian has resisted the urge to take the piss out of him and his disability

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Maybe so but that's not his fault, as far as I know every other comedian has resisted the urge to take the piss out of him and his disability

its the shock factor!
you could say if jordan did not do so many drugs and not drink like a fish when she was pregnant he would have turned out normal!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Papers are meant to print facts, if they say that someone's a racist when they aren't then they're susceptible to lawsuits, comparing the papers to the content of a stand up act is a foolish comparison really as they aren't bound by the same laws.

Wrong, we are a democracy and Everyone is bound by the same laws.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by kizzy

Wrong, we are a democracy and Everyone is bound by the same laws.

your wrong on this!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

its the shock factor!
you could say if jordan did not do so many drugs and not drink like a fish when she was pregnant he would have turned out normal!

sick

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

your wrong on this!

Am I....how?

[the truth]

people get fined, jailed imprisoned for using abusive , discriminatory or racist language all the time, why should frankie boyle we allowed to get away with being a bigot any more than anyone else?

[Redway]

Maybe because he isn't a racist?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by kizzy

Am I....how?

the content of a stand up routine is purley for entertainment value,
whereas a paper printing that some one is a racist without proof is a different matter all together.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

the content of a stand up routine is purley for entertainment value,
whereas a paper printing that some one is a racist without proof is a different matter all together.

Whats that to do with the point you made about the law being different?
So like I've said before as long as you are grossly offensive and libelous in the name of comedy its fine...

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by kizzy

Whats that to do with the point you made about the law being different?
So like I've said before as long as you are grossly offensive and libelous in the name of comedy its fine...

yes!
you know what is being said is for entertainment value if you did not want to hear it you would not pay to see it!
the law is not the same for a stand up routine as it is for a news paper.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

yes!
you know what is being said is for entertainment value if you did not want to hear it you would not pay to see it!
the law is not the same for a stand up routine as it is for a news paper.

So in that case how did Katie Price sue Frankie Boyle for his comments relating to her disabled son?

[MTVN]

I'm pretty sure she didn't..

[the truth]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

yes!
you know what is being said is for entertainment value if you did not want to hear it you would not pay to see it!
the law is not the same for a stand up routine as it is for a news paper.

i didnt pay to see him discriminate against indivudal disabled people on tv, he shouldnt be allowed on there, he shou;ld be prosecuted for discriminating disabled people, period. the man is breaking the law

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by kizzy

So in that case how did Katie Price sue Frankie Boyle for his comments relating to her disabled son?

did she sue?
she was planning to sue but i never heard anymore!
channel four would not even give katie price an apology, for his remarks.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by the truth

i didnt pay to see him discriminate against indivudal disabled people on tv, he shouldnt be allowed on there, he shou;ld be prosecuted for discriminating disabled people, period. the man is breaking the law

if there is a warning before the program then he is not breaking the law!.
its the same as the disclaimer signs,

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

did she sue?
she was planning to sue but i never heard anymore!
channel four would not even give katie price an apology, for his remarks.

Ah, thats right she did attempt to as any rational person would do after that abuse.
I can't imagine having to contend with that, we will have to agree to disagree I think.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by kizzy

Ah, thats right she did attempt to as any rational person would do after that abuse.
I can't imagine having to contend with that, we will have to agree to disagree I think.

yes we will have to,lol
but jordan should have kept her family out of it,but her hunger for fame and money, means she would and will do anything to stay in the spot light.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

yes we will have to,lol
but jordan should have kept her family out of it,but her hunger for fame and money, means she would and will do anything to stay in the spot light.

nothing to do with it. boyle broke the law in his abuse of that disabld child. hopefully the bigot will soon be banned and jailed for his endless absusive discrimination.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by the truth

nothing to do with it. boyle broke the law in his abuse of that disabld child. hopefully the bigot will soon be banned and jailed for his endless absusive discrimination.

boyle takes the p*ss out everybody not just disabled people, if he was to say how great they all are it wouldn't be comedy, why are you only speaking up for diabled people do you think they have more rights than anyone else?
who's dicriminating now?