[user104658]

Discuss. Debate. Be serious about, etc.

I ask this because I received a warning for posting a well researched and to my knowledge 100% accurate thread about David Cameron being a robot joint of ham controlled by vegan activists (it was in the news yesterday, I just can't find the link right now) and yet, it seems to be perfectly ok for people to post wild, hysterical, nonsense-based statements about other politicians without a word being said about it .

So I'm wondering: hypothetically, where is the line drawn?

[Northern Monkey]

[Kizzy]

It's drawn on the right... * knocks table over*

[Christmas Dynasnow]

a warning?

seriously?

[Kyle]

Toy Soldier's gone rogue.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

a warning?

seriously?

Yes, not an infraction, I think they're different but I don't really know / care . Guess one of the mods must be a covert Tory. "Toy Soldier's stupid posts are a threat to you, your family, national security, The Queen, and you won't be able to get Doctor Who or Eastenders."

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes, not an infraction, I think they're different but I don't really know / care . Guess one of the mods must be a covert Tory. "Toy Soldier's stupid posts are a threat to you, your family, national security, The Queen, and you won't be able to get Doctor Who or Eastenders."

I think all politicians should be ridiculed equally

[ChristmasNeeve]

Closed - Serious debates is serious Debates not a place for threads about politicians who may or may not be robot ham joints

PS. A warning is just that, asking you not to do something, there are no points with it and it doesn't lead to a ban

PPS. Don't discuss your infractions/warnings on the main board