[Lex]

Originally Posted by Livia

Dexter doesn't need to make sleazy remarks. The fact that he's quite openly discussed paying for sex and using women as accessories... the fact that he calls himself "London's Biggest Sugar Daddy" (although he doesn't actually come from, or live in, London), the fact that he's a "dating coach" and thinks that he can pass on the skills to get women in to bed while his own approach to Hazel and Charlie would suggest he could do with a class himself... His whole persona is sleazy.

Sam probably shouldn't have said what he did. But he's naive, rather than a sleaze and for people to be acting all outraged at Sam makes me LMFAO.

Ok forget the Dexter rant...substitute his name for anyone else's that hasn't chosen the "edgy-persona gameplan"...let's say someone around Sam's age [24 ish] ...someone without the disability,...someone that, like Sam has been brought up in a normal family environment, and has travelled the world [he spent part of his life in America without his family don;t forget] a lad that claims to have had [apart from his hearing problem] a pretty normal life, with ...and yet you claim naivety for his comments? mmmmh...me smells double standards Livia!