 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 13,107
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 13,107
|
60/40 in favour of the man. Not necessarily for chivalrous reasons but for the fact that women typically do a lot more as regards childcare/housekeeping. Assuming a certain leadership in a financial sense only makes sense when women seem to do more in general without monetary reward. That’s all. It doesn’t have to be done on the basis of misogyny, patriarchal undertones or outdated chivalry. It’s just for the sake of levelling up overall. That’s how you achieve a 50/50 balance.
For those reasons I wouldn’t want to be with a woman richer than myself but that’s just me.
__________________

At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that.
Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers.
London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured.
|