FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Safe cycling
SIR – Your correspondent D F G Dobson (Letters, February 26) states that when dual-use pavements are provided (for use by cyclists and pedestrians), cyclists must use them. The Highway Code is quite clear on this. Rule 61 states: “While such facilities are provided for reasons of safety, cyclists may exercise their judgment and are not obliged to use them.” As a keen but cautious cyclist I am often more nervous when cycling on dual- use pavements. Not only do I have to be careful around pedestrians, but I also need to watch out for cars coming out of driveways, as well as for traffic exiting or turning into side streets, which requires me to scan 360 degrees at every junction with a minor road. Far safer, in most circumstances, to simply cycle on the road. Ian Thomson Nantwich, Cheshire SIR – Cyclists riding on pavements with impunity are a menace, but added to that danger is the increasing number of riders wearing headphones. I recently remonstrated with a cyclist who was wearing a pair of these as well as a mask, while speeding along the pavement, by saying: “Why don’t you go the whole hog and wear a blindfold?” Needless to say, he couldn’t hear me. Guy Bargery Edinburgh |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|