[user104658]

Originally Posted by Swan

People make out he's a danger to women, i've never seen that from him. Trump and Tate on the other hand, they genuinely are a danger to women. Morgan probably isn't a danger to women, but he's a complete slimeball and only out for himself.

Tate's rhetoric is foundationally based in Peterson-style (if not directly Petersonian) psychology/social philosophy though. You'll find a lot of his thinking at the core of a tonne of reddit/incel/redpiller stuff. Did he intend that? Probably not, but people have taken his thinking and run with it to dangerous conclusions, and he's never attempted to correct them.

That he can present it in intelligent, interesting and compelling ways is actually what makes him so dangerous IMO. Only teenagers and gym bros are listening to someone like Tate ... Peterson has more influence than that.

I agree on Morgan, he's just a populist who knows his crowd.