Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
Really? The simple truth is: no one should have anything rammed down their throats or forced to accept clientele that they don't wish to have on their premises. Very very few small businesses are so select that the public does not have an alternative choice. So it's only the 'consumer' or the 'end user' that is allowed the choice - going bywhat is going on here.
What about the human rights of the small business person then - who cater for and to a very specific market - clearly that means nothing then, as does THEIR own rights to cater to a specific market of their chosing. It's only the end user that gets the choice. Isn't that discrimination in reversal?
|
Funny thing is it all started of with the gay couple and the christian B&B naturally the gay couple didnt "entrap" the christians by ignoring the "married couples only" bit.
Now because someone has pointed out to the EHRC(Equality and Human Rights Commission) that they have to be balanced and fair, they are instigating an investigation into gay only businesses. Obviously this isnt just "being seen to be fair" or justifying their own existence.
The law is a double edged sword, sometimes it cuts the users.