Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippy
seriously what the hell are you on about? I have no interest in trivialising anything. You're the pathetic one misreading peoples posts all the time and going off on some ridiculous rant.
My opinion about Glitter is that he is a hardcore paedo and Glee should not have chosen is work for the show. But now they have then he is entitled to the royalties. Is that clear enough for you?
seems you're the queen of deflection. So desperate to seize the upperhand you twist everything. Sad sad sad.
ps; you choose to believe that Wilde had no interest in young boys even though it's a very well known aspect of his life. At this point proof is impossible so it all comes down to how one chooses to interpret what they read about him. I suggest YOU are the gullible idiot if you can read about his life and not think he ever touched an underage boy!
|
A predictable rant from someone who believes in his own twisted logic.


I don't "
choose" to believe in anything - I base my opinions on tangible, solid proof or the evidence of my own eyes. Why don't you try it sometime? Has it occurred to you that a lot of the vitriol directed towards Wilde back in the day was based on homophobia? It's also entirely possible that there were attempts to accuse him of all sorts of aberrant behaviour in order to gain a conviction. Even in our so called enlightened times a lot of people still believe that homosexuals are also paedophiles.
Back on topic, I don't need to court your's or anyone else's approval before denouncing idiot producers of a crummy US show (which primarily appeals to a young audience) who have chosen a fairly average song by a convicted paedophile, when they had the option of choosing from thousands of other equally average songs - (in particular the title of the song is hugely inappropriate given GG's
proven predilection for sex with children).
Let's face it you just don't like being picked up on your random, ill thought out throwaway comments, to which I can only respond by saying "tough".