Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-03-2012, 01:52 PM #1
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Default Right-to-Die case gets the go to High Court

Quote:
A paralysed man who wants a doctor to help him die has won the right to have his case heard at the High Court.

Tony Nicklinson can only communicate by blinking his eyes and describes his life as "undignified and intolerable."

He is incapable of taking his own life and argued that a doctor should be able to intervene without fear of prosecution for murder.

The case is significant because it effectively requires a defence of mercy killing.

The judge, Mr Justice Charles, rejected an application from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ)that the case should be struck out because it could result in a change to the law - and only Parliament should do that.

He said it was an "exceptional case" and that it could be heard at the High Court in the coming weeks.

Mr Nicklinson welcomed the decision.

He said: "This is good news indeed. I am delighted that we can now move on to discuss the pertinent issues properly in a dispassionate court of law."

The judge allowed the case to proceed on two grounds. He said Mr Nicklinson's lawyers could argue that a doctor should be allowed to kill him on the grounds of necessity - in other words that Mr Nicklinson's situation is so desperate a doctor could break the law to intervene.

He also said lawyers should be allowed to argue that the current law of murder and assisted suicide is incompatible with Mr Nicklinson's right to a private life under the Human Rights Act because it criminalises voluntary active euthanasia.

Mr Nicklinson's solicitor, Saimo Chahal, said: "This is a very good result for Tony. It would be completely wrong if the arguments on Tony's behalf could not be fully argued on the grounds that we should wait for Parliament to change the law.

"The court has an active case before it and is fully able to examine the details in depth and to reach a decision having heard all of the facts, evidence and legal arguments."
Source: http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16186808

What are your thoughts on this? And in on many cases around the entire world regarding euthanasia?

Would you want to help a family member out if they were to [devastatingly] fall into the same situation?

Last edited by Marc; 12-03-2012 at 01:56 PM.
Marc is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
case, court, high, righttodie


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts