|
oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by minny03
I agree with everything that's been said by most people in here (Jack, Patrick, etc.) I mean seriously, what the **** are the producers doing?! I honestly don't get it. How do the producers benefit from getting all the big characters out in the first few weeks? How does this help the show? Do they not want their own show to be successful?
They know exactly what will happen with vote to evict and this is what initially killed the show in the first place. There is a reason why most US reality shows are STILL successful after being on the air for more than ten years. The producers in America know the importance of making significant changes to their show before it becomes stale and boring. Sometimes the changes work, sometimes they don't. But what matters is that they make a gamble and try to do something new or different to make sure viewers keep watching their tv show.
I just can't believe that they would do something like this. BB14 had the potential of being a fantastic series and the producers ****ing ruined it in one fell swoop. I honestly need a logical explanation on why they make so many stupid decisions like this. Even on a business standpoint, how does getting the polarizing housemates out first help this program? Do they not see the value in people like Gina and Sallie?!!
|
*applauds*
Great post.
|