[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mokkajava

Except that personality is subjective and Game play can be measured to some degree.
For example: I think Jocasta was the worst personality to ever come on the show, yet many people on this forum liked her personality. But, we can all agree that she had no game.


Hence, one man's Enzo is another's Dan or Donny, but for winners, there is only one a season and they usually (not always) played a good game.

Obviously personality is subjective, but "s/he played a good game" isn't a personality trait at all. If I don't like you, I won't care if you played a good game because I still don't like you. Similarly, if you have the worst gameplay in the world but I like you then I don't care. The notion of caring about gameplay above all else has always been perplexing to me because the personalities involved obviously matter a lot more. If you just care about X plotting to get Y out, you can watch a chess match or read about the season on Wikipedia without actually watching anything and it would have the same effect.

Essentially, as I've said repeatedly in other threads, it comes down to the fact that this is BBUS. This show is rigged and manipulated as ****, Grodner doesn't even try to hide it anymore, etc. You can be the best gameplayer in the world but if you don't make her pussy wet then it doesn't matter. The notion of liking people because "they played a(n ostensibly) good game" is just absurd to me when the real game goes on in the DR between you and the producers.