[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Marc hadn't done the show, he has done other shows which includes contracts and assumed he knew everything to ever know about it, if he did say he had done the show (which I'm sure he didn't) then he was only lying to win the argument because he has not done the show.

My only argument was that Marc has no idea about an ITV contracts or a Judge Rinder contract, and he was out of line to assume he knew it all and scream down at a woman for being a liar, when really he has no ****ing idea. This is still my only argument.

Marc doesn't need to be nostradamus or a media barrister to know that the contract must contain the details of who would be paid by who at the ending of the case.

You really don't seem to understand what a contract is. It isn't an IOU, scribbled on the back of a fag packet. It is a very detailed and precise document, drawn up and inspected by expert lawyers in the field.

I will ask you again. If Aisleyne's contract did not contain the detail of ITV being the one to pay her, then what would be the point of the contract? How could aisleyne enforce a contract that didn't stipulate who would pay her and when?