[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

It is the responsibility of the state to enforced rules.
But id be ****ed if tax payers money is to be spent on putting in sprinkler systems
thats these people responsibilities, if they own the flat, or the landlords responsibilities.
at the end of the day, these people would most likely not have been for the price to install sprinkers as they wouldnt want to spend the money or see their rent go up.
Living a cheap life can have consequences.

Thats obviously not the case. The petitions from the residents about more fire safety are proof to that.
Are you suggesting all those people living in that now burnt out block were living a cheap life? These people were living in the richest borough in the country. Are they cheap because they couldn't afford to get out off Lancaster West, the only substantial council estate that Rotten borough has.

Then the government should have raised the rent higher than the cost to fit the sprinkler system and made us some good money.

What an incredibly insensitive suggestion. They haven't even found all the dead yet and you're suggesting they could of saved themselves if only they didn't want to live on the cheap and we could of made money out of them by screwing them over for the very thing that could of saved their lives.
UFB