FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
1.5x speed
|
I grew up in a vast majority black and brown area (a handful of white families)... but even we were like "This place is a dump!"
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Actually, if you read the article, the only person saying that Sparkbrook is a 'no go' zone is someone that sounds very much like an uncomfortable white person
![]() The full article is a story of an area that is prone to producing extremists and how the community comes together to try to prevent extremism from taking hold. The only times 'no go' zones get mentioned are in the opening paragraph and in a quote from an uncomfortable white person. An area being predominantly one race does not exclude other races from the area, if that was the case then the countryside would be mostly a no go area for non white people. You're not going to override what I'm saying with reaching examples from articles that aren't even relevant to what's being said. |
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|