[Jessica.]

He's only under investigation, not facing sack.

[Tony Montana]

Originally Posted by Jessica.

He's only under investigation, not facing sack.

Oops, I could've sworn it said facing sack at first.

[MTVN]

So it describes her as a patient but then says she was there about her child. I'm sure the doctor was quite capable of hearing her through the veil so I don't think there was a need for her to remove it in this case

[Ammi]

...I’m interested as to who the creator of the petition is...


“I believe he acted in the best interest of the child involved and there was no racist or religious discrimination in his actions.

“We need to ensure the General Medical Council treat this man fairly and look at all the evidence.

“Our NHS is severely understaffed and we cannot afford to lose doctors due to fabricated accusations of discrimination.”


...How could they possibly know whether something had been ‘fabricated’ or know that no discrimination had taken place..?...

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jessica.

He's only under investigation, not facing sack.

He is unable to work while under investigation as he is a freelancer and his agency won't send him out

[Cherie]

Difficult one to judge, on the one hand she is in his private office and with her husband and child and he may have had difficulty understanding how she was describing the childs symptoms and thought removing her veil might help him and her communicate better, why couldn't the husband have explained? was he in the room as he is the one who complained? so I'm thinking English may be a second language, on the other hand he might be a power mad pompous ass ...who knows.....its all a bit too vague, so I won't be signing the petition