Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier Boy
I'm going to leave this one alone because it just winds me up too much honestly.
I accept that people have their vices, and if accepting it for what it is and continuing to engage with and consume pornography is on balance something anyone wants to accept as a reasonable trade-off to keep doing something they enjoy, I can actually accept that for what it is. No one is without their vices, anyone who claims to be is lying.
However... to ignore the facts and argue that it's not an issue and not harmful, when it has been shown, indisputably, time and time again, to be an industry (both professional and amateur) that causes both direct and indirect harm, in order to continue to enjoy it with a guilt-free conscience, is something else entirely.
|
Porn has it's problems behind the scenes, I don't think that anyone is denying that.
It's just to me personally, I don't see how an entertainment product (which is what Porn is intended to be) turns normal children into rapists? To me that already tells me that these children were already broken, and Porn possibly gave them a method to act it out on this poor girl.
But my belief is that if it weren't Porn or Andrew Tate (whichever one that it's likely to be) then I think that they would've committed another criminal offense instead.
Damaged kids is always a sad scenario imo, but I would be looking at family members, Teachers, or Social Media Influencers maybe possibly teaching these kids dangerous ideology, and then they've taken it to the victim.
__________________
Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.