[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…and it’s totally your prerogative to believe wherever your thoughts guide you, Mock…but for me I don’t see any substance in what Izaaz inferred…(…if that’s what he was inferring…)…Nathan wouldn’t be the first housemate to go for a ‘tricking the public gameplay of showmance’ is one thing but sexuality isn’t something that’s necessarily questioned in that ‘fake’….he also hasn’t showed/displayed any flirting or any type of attraction or particular admiration etc to any of the males in the house so far as I can see…so there is no substance or reasoning for Izaaz to contra that BP wouldn’t be his ‘type’….

I think it's just the vibe that Nathan is giving off if that makes sense?

I'm assuming that Izaaz probably picked up on it more living with him, like you said if he was even inferring that in the first place.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I think it's just the vibe that Nathan is giving off if that makes sense?

I'm assuming that Izaaz probably picked up on it more living with him, like you said if he was even inferring that in the first place.

…I think for me, the ‘vibe’ that Nathan is giving off is more that he’s creating a storyline of house romance as a way to maybe get through to the final…?…and because of their friendship, BP was the ‘partner’ he chose but there for me is no ‘chemistry’ because it feels forced into being something romantic, which it isn’t…if Nathan had never been revealed as not labelling his sexuality etc but actually had said that he was heterosexual…?…the fakemance soul surely not even be questioned or inferred to as ‘not his type’…it is for me showing a lack of understanding from Izaaz and himself having to try to put a label onto something…