| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
van der Woodsen
|
It's all socially constructed, but there's generally a universal understanding about what constitutes 'good' and 'bad'. However, as with everything, it's all labelled semantics.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
We see good as anything that contributes to survival of the process of evolution, and evil with anything that destroys the furtherment of the fittest. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
van der Woodsen
|
At it's basic level, yes - good point. But then some 'bad' things would be considered helpful to survival for the individual (stealing food when starving). It's all very subjective.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|