[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

When you show me where Aaron swore on his mother's life that he would share the winnings.... I'll address your point.

Not once did I say that Aaron did, that was never the claim I was making. What I am asking is; do you think an agreement doesn't need to be kept to unless they each swear on their mother's life, even if they shake hands on it and verbally agree?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Irony.

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Sorry, I must have missed the bit where Aaron swore on his mother's life that he would share the £50k winner's prize money.

Perhaps you'd like to put up a clip of him saying this.

Until then..... No irony I am right and you know it.

Originally Posted by MTVN

Not once did I say that Aaron did, that was never the claim I was making. What I am asking is; do you think an agreement doesn't need to be kept to unless they each swear on their mother's life, even if they shake hands on it and verbally agree?

See prev post of yours in which you stated Irony.... and quoted two very different situations. You still have to show me proof of where the irony lies.

Until you do, I am 100% behind my previous posts.... given that Jay went against the agreement that they did not buy gifts: then changed his mind without consulting Aaron... then that therefore means, Aaron is right to do the same if he choses. It is the exact same principle. There question has been answered ( indeed, I answered it earlier but you appear not to have noted it)

You cannot back up what you have said..... and what you have quoted, and resorted to personal slanging instead.

Now isn't this the point where a mod normally steps in and says, "Right you two, quit the arguing"......

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

See prev post of yours in which you stated Irony.... and quoted two very different situations. You still have to show me proof of where the irony lies.

Until you do, I am 100% behind my previous post.

You cannot back up what you have said..... and what you have quoted, and resorted to personal slanging instead.

Now isn't this the point where a mod normally steps in and says, "Right you two, quit the arguing"......

The irony is this:

You insist that Alex should split her winnings to share with Aaron as agreed

You are "delighted" that Aaron will not be sharing his winnings with Jays as agreed



And no this isn't that time, we're just debating. As you do on a forum ya know.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

The irony is this:

You insist that Alex should split her winnings to share with Aaron as agreed

You are "delighted" that Aaron will not be sharing his winnings with Jays as agreed

See my edit.

Yes. Both different scenarios. One was with all housemates swearing on their mothers' lives. The other situations were not.

You clearly are avoiding that crucial aspect: for no other reason that arguing.