[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Thanks Chuff. I was doing a little bit of reading on it and tbh I'm not sure the dogs prove anything :

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.ie/...s-are-not.html

Niamh you are on a pro site there, well known for lies ,this has links to unbiased reports on the dogs used in case please scroll down and read all the references to them ,not by Maddie defenders by police and F.B.I http://www.mccannfiles.com/id157.html

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Niamh you are on a pro site there, well known for lies ,this has links to unbiased reports on the dogs used in case please scroll down and read all the references to them ,not by Maddie defenders by police and F.B.I http://www.mccannfiles.com/id157.html

Yeah, there's so much stuff out there it's difficult to know which ones are accurate and which ones are not

[Josy]

I was reading something interesting earlier, on one of those websites they were claiming it was strange that the McCanns were so quick to have images ready to hand out and that that was suspicious behaviour etc...but then reading another link to witness statements (I think the one that Vicky posted) blew that accusation right out the water because one of the hotel managers actually says in her statement that she went to get her printer, carried it back and used the McCanns memory card to do the printouts.

That just shows how some of the websites fabricate things to further their own points.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Josy

I was reading something interesting earlier, on one of those websites they were claiming it was strange that the McCanns were so quick to have images ready to hand out and that that was suspicious behaviour etc...but then reading another link to witness statements (I think the one that Vicky posted) blew that accusation right out the water because one of the hotel managers actually says in her statement that she went to get her printer, carried it back and used the McCanns memory card to do the printouts.

That just shows how some of the websites fabricate things to further their own points.

The amount of misinformation and contradictory reports on the case is criminal in itself. I wish there was a way of prosecuting people for disseminating incorrect information it would stop a lot of the internet detectives in their tracks.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

[/B]

The amount of misinformation and contradictory reports on the case is criminal in itself. I wish there was a way of prosecuting people for disseminating incorrect information it would stop a lot of the internet detectives in their tracks.

Yeah that's why I'm finding reading all these websites so interesting, you can read something as absolute proof on one then the next one you read completely tears it apart with a rational explanation.

Originally Posted by Cherie

[/B]

The amount of misinformation and contradictory reports on the case is criminal in itself. I wish there was a way of prosecuting people for disseminating incorrect information it would stop a lot of the internet detectives in their tracks.

I know a lot of people are genuinely interested and asking questions to find out more information, but it's the certainty that the McCanns are guilty in some quarters of the internet that is sickening. They've already decided the outcome, so now they only read the information that gets them there, and call everything else lies, media spin, and government protection. Complete confirmation bias.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

I know a lot of people are genuinely interested and asking questions to find out more information, but it's the certainty that the McCanns are guilty in some quarters of the internet that is sickening. They've already decided the outcome, so now they only read the information that gets them there, and call everything else lies, media spin, and government protection. Complete confirmation bias.

Yep.