| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Health, Beauty & Fashion New forum to discuss health, beauty & fashion topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
The evidence against supplements continues to pile up. Recently I created a list of The Top 5 Vitamins You Shouldn’t Take. Now I’m expanding that list to include vitamin D, which is taken by almost half of older adults. Now, two new studies in latest issue of The Lancet show that most of these people are wasting their money.
The first study is a large review by Philippe Autier and colleagues, who found that taking supplemental vitamin D has no effect on a wide range of diseases and conditions. After looking at over 450 studies, the authors conclude: “The absence of an effect of vitamin D supplementation on disease occurrence, severity, and clinical course leads to the hypothesis that variations [in vitamin D levels] would essentially be a result, and not a cause, of ill health.” So it appears that we’ve been getting cause and effect backwards, at least as far as vitamin D is concerned. … Vitamin D supplements, to put it plainly, are a waste of money. … So here’s my expanded list of the Top Six Vitamins You Shouldn’t Take, with the newest entrant at the end: Vitamin C Vitamin A and beta carotene Vitamin E Vitamin B6 Multi-vitamins Vitamin D … What’s left? Well, if you don’t have a deficiency, there’s no reason to take any supplemental vitamins at all. … Save your money. Or better yet, if you must spend it, buy a bit more fresh fruit. You’ll be healthier for it. via The Top Six Vitamins You Should Not Take – Forbes. https://xenophilius.wordpress.com/20...not-take-hmmm/ |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|