[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Jarrod

It's not disgusting. I contacted the press office about Joel leaving the House and they told me they wouldn't be commenting on the subject. Maybe it was Joel that didn't want it broadcast for a certain reason and would rather have told people on his own terms - as he did.

"Joel has left the house for health reasons" would have been substantial enough. The fact that they ignored it all together was a bit strange. Let me have my opinions please.

Also, if Joel didn't want the public knowing, then why is he making a news article out of it?

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by AshRley

"Joel has left the house for health reasons" would have been substantial enough. The fact that they ignored it all together was a bit strange. Let me have my opinions please.

Also, if Joel didn't want the public knowing, then why is he making a news article out of it?

He probably wasn't ready to tell the story while in the house

[Jarrod]

Originally Posted by AshRley

"Joel has left the house for health reasons" would have been substantial enough. The fact that they ignored it all together was a bit strange. Let me have my opinions please.

Also, if Joel didn't want the public knowing, then why is he making a news article out of it?

Your opinion is there, I'm not stopping you having one. I'm entitled to my opinion and to debate the topic. The show was under no obligation to tell the public what happened to Joel. It was his personal problem. Just because he's on Big Brother doesn't mean we have to know everything. Joel leaving the house had no effect at all on what happened during the highlights or tasks, so I don't see the need to tell everyone what happened. If Joel has left for a trivial reason then fair enough but this was a private medical condition.

Also, he didn't make an article. He tweeted and an article was made by someone else.