[Cherie]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Another example of 'The Truth That Dare Not Be Spoken' Before any CCTV pics were published, I predicted to my friend that when this twat was caught, they would not call him Bill Smith or Fred Jones -- if you know what I mean. I just dare not state as much on here.

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

However, I had not seen any such photo, nor had any previous knowledge, but was simply talking briefly with a neighbour who mentioned that 'another nutter was at it, attacking women in London'. He did not mention specifics, or give any description of the perpetrator, but then he did not have to, and I casually told him; "Odds on it will be a foreigner" Or words to that effect, and NO - despite what some on here may insist - I was NOT being xenophobic or racist, just realistic.



Much like if one went fishing every week in the same pond one had fished in for decades, but increasingly one now kept hooking 80% turds where it used to be mainly fish – then one is either mistakenly fishing in a cess pit, or those once well-stocked waters are becoming increasingly polluted.

Have a nice day.

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Not at all - I am referring specifically to CRIMINALS within the context of this thread - NOT 'PEOPLE OF COLOUR' or 'FOREIGNERS' per se.

.

So I guess 80% of London is full of criminals then ..the back pedalling .

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Cherie

So I guess 80% of London is full of criminals then ..the back pedalling .

I cannot help your skewed perception of what I CLEARLY wrote, nor does your personal opportunist axe-grinding come as any surprise to me.

I am not back-peddling at all, merely explaining what I meant to someone who I respect and do not wish to fall out with.

Perhaps YOU could explain how you educe that "London is 80% full of criminals" from what I ACTUALLY wrote?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I cannot help your skewed perception of what I CLEARLY wrote, nor does your personal opportunist axe-grinding come as any surprise to me.

I love how you apologise to Niamh but attack me, my perception isn't scewed if it were no one would agree with it, get over it, I normally avoid your posts but in some cases I just can't let them pass. Just have a look at how many of your posts I have actually commented on in the last month and find that personal axe you are talking about please. I will be waiting.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I love how you apologise to Niamh but attack me, my perception isn't scewed if it were no one would agree with it, get over it, I normally avoid your posts but in some cases I just can't let them pass. Just have a look at how many of your posts I have actually commented on in the last month and find that personal axe you are talking about please. I will be waiting.

There is a vast difference in my 'attacking' you, as you knowingly wrongly claim, and in my 'defending' myself against your attack, which is the true state of affairs.

Your specification of "the last month" as evidence that you have not "commented" on my posts is as disgenuine as your claim that you "normally avoid" my posts, because it was ME who told you that I was ignoring YOU about a month ago after you - once again - seized upon a minor disagreement which I had with young JoshBB and blew it up out of all proportion, milking it for all it was worth to satisfy your own agenda. THE TRUTH OF THIS IS THERE ON THE THREADS.

And I HAVE ignored you since.

And it is ironic that you write: "but in some cases I just can't let them pass." Because, you have forced me into a position where I cannot let your comments pass.

However, I suggest we leave it here, because I do not want to to be warned, infracted or banned and yet it IS impossible to defend myself against such 'personal' attack from the predictable 'usual suspects' WITHOUT getting personal in return.

I suggest we just continue to ignore each other.

Bye.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

There is a vast difference in my 'attacking' you, as you knowingly wrongly claim, and in my 'defending' myself against your attack, which is the true state of affairs.

Your specification of "the last month" as evidence that you have not "commented" on my posts is as disgenuine as your claim that you "normally avoid" my posts, because it was ME who told you that I was ignoring YOU about a month ago after you - once again - seized upon a minor disagreement which I had with young JoshBB and blew it up out of all proportion, milking it for all it was worth to satisfy your own agenda. THE TRUTH OF THIS IS THERE ON THE THREADS.

And I HAVE ignored you since.

And it is ironic that you write: "but in some cases I just can't let them pass." Because, you have forced me into a position where I cannot let your comments pass.

However, I suggest we leave it here, because I do not want to to be warned, infracted or banned and yet it IS impossible to defend myself against such 'personal' attack from the predictable 'usual suspects' WITHOUT getting personal in return.

I suggest we just continue to ignore each other.

Bye.

Find the thread Kirk because it was you who blew that out of all proportion, and if you don't I will, I made a mild comment to stop talking down to Josh because of his age, others had also commented on this, JoeyS and DemoRed but you chose to me to post a full 4 paragraph diatribe against, now who has the axe to grind. I told you then and I will tell you again now, don't tell me what or who to ignore I will please myself.