[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

You're missing the point, as per usual.

I wouldn't want either death because the method is irrelevant, it's still death either way. It's still butchering an animal for food that we do not even need. I'm not defending either method of execution, I'm saying that, in the end, neither is preferable to the animal, neither is painless and neither of them are REALLY humane. People just delude themselves into thinking that there's a humane way of doing it.

As a meat eater I don't see the difference between the two methods, it's only the bleeding hearts that are deluding themselves into thinking they are good people for preferring the stunning method. Eating meat is selfish and people do it because they like it, not because they need it. I'm not deluding myself into thinking that there's a good painless way to kill animals because there isn't.

It's funny that you're saying I'm being politically correct, surely the PC view of things is the view that you have in which you've fooled yourself into thinking that one method is better than another.

More like you're the one trying to be edgy and go against the grain as usual. Yes no animal NEEDS to die for food however it is human nature to eat meat and therefore if a method is in place where that can happen whilst causing as little suffering as possible to the animal that is only a good thing. I just find your view on the situation as negative and narrow minded and you need to get off your high horse judging people for trying to show some empathy.