[JerseyWins]

Originally Posted by Pro Sniper

Jurors: Ok, let's start tossing coins..

[Pro Sniper]

Originally Posted by JerseyWins

I honestly believe this is something that should be introduced to the Jurors arsenal. On any given season where there's 2 bits of floating trash bobbing in the f2(the example this season being any combo from the 3 stooges) each juror can express his/her disdain by opting to leave it up to pure chance.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Pro Sniper

I honestly believe this is something that should be introduced to the Jurors arsenal. On any given season where there's 2 bits of floating trash bobbing in the f2(the example this season being any combo from the 3 stooges) each juror can express his/her disdain by opting to leave it up to pure chance.

No.

who cares if two floaters are final 2, the moves have been meh this season and winning comps isn't that important for the win, social is important more than comp wins and if one of them had a better social game than the other then they deserved that win.

[Pro Sniper]

Originally Posted by LukeB

No.

who cares if two floaters are final 2, the moves have been meh this season and winning comps isn't that important for the win, social is important more than comp wins and if one of them had a better social game than the other then they deserved that win.

Only having a "social game" is what makes for terrible, rotten seasons. Why do they even bother having comps at all? They should all just have a group orgy and vote out the worst lover each week.

Only having a "social game" means you're never in control of your own destiny - let alone any group of people you keep promising to "have their back". It's embarrassing watching these type of weak morons float around deluding themselves that they're in control of what's happening. Even if I despise floating garbage, I can at least have a little respect for any player who makes it clear that this is all they have, as it's almost certainly their only shot at winning. The trouble is most are not content to be seen in such a way. So they start trying to take credit for any/every move that happens..pretending they're "throwing" every comp(so convenient) etc.. and all it ends up doing is make them look desperate and pathetic. Paras being the perfect example.

If all you have is pure social then fine, but OWN IT. Tell the jury members that's all you had and that's what ultimately got you sitting there. Paras to jury members: I couldn't win jack sh!t and floated my way through the game. But come on guys, did anyone suck ass as good as me? Jurors: Fair point. Also, we were dumb enough to believe your sweet pea bullsh!t crying routine. So here's the 100k.

What's up with that? Everyone is honest and we move on.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Pro Sniper

Only having a "social game" is what makes for terrible, rotten seasons. Why do they even bother having comps at all? They should all just have a group orgy and vote out the worst lover each week.

Only having a "social game" means you're never in control of your own destiny - let alone any group of people you keep promising to "have their back". It's embarrassing watching these type of weak morons float around deluding themselves that they're in control of what's happening. Even if I despise floating garbage, I can at least have a little respect for any player who makes it clear that this is all they have, as it's almost certainly their only shot at winning. The trouble is most are not content to be seen in such a way. So they start trying to take credit for any/every move that happens..pretending they're "throwing" every comp(so convenient) etc.. and all it ends up doing is make them look desperate and pathetic. Paras being the perfect example.

If all you have is pure social then fine, but OWN IT. Tell the jury members that's all you had and that's what ultimately got you sitting there. Paras to jury members: I couldn't win jack sh!t and floated my way through the game. But come on guys, did anyone suck ass as good as me? Jurors: Fair point. Also, we were dumb enough to believe your sweet pea bullsh!t crying routine. So here's the 100k.

What's up with that? Everyone is honest and we move on.

Big Brother is a social experiment and there's more to BB than comps, you don't have to win comps to win the game look at Dr will? Paul lost twice because his social was crap, he won a lot of comps but his social game let him down.

Winning comps gets you further and could you get your target out but that isn't enough, jury management is the key to winning which is where your social game comes in to it a player should be on good terms whoever is evicted. Paras doing that is hilarious and if it gets her the win the lol <3 All of the final 5 have done something right to be where they are so well done to them and there hasn't been any good gameplay at all so i wouldn't class any of them as good gameplayers, erica will be known as a comp beast rather than a good player she was doing so well, she was socially in a good spot and didn't need to win comps at that time.

[Pro Sniper]

Originally Posted by LukeB

Big Brother is a social experiment and there's more to BB than comps, you don't have to win comps to win the game look at Dr will? Paul lost twice because his social was crap, he won a lot of comps but his social game let him down.

Winning comps gets you further and could you get your target out but that isn't enough, jury management is the key to winning which is where your social game comes in to it a player should be on good terms whoever is evicted. Paras doing that is hilarious and if it gets her the win the lol <3 All of the final 5 have done something right to be where they are so well done to them and there hasn't been any good gameplay at all so i wouldn't class any of them as good gameplayers, erica will be known as a comp beast rather than a good player she was doing so well, she was socially in a good spot and didn't need to win comps at that time.

I'm well aware you "don't have to" win comps. Will treated the whole game as a joke and just fell into the win. But at least he never bullshat everyone about how "strategic" he was. His game was all about having fun and charming his way to the end. The point remains the players who win comps are the ones who drive the show. if you win nothing you're just backseat fodder. That's the whole trouble with players like Paras,, they're obviously not content with that. They're desperate to have viewers believe they're in the front seat driving the course. When all they're really doing is being "socially good" from a backseat position..and living in hope that the drivers don't kick them out at the next stop.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by LukeB

No.

who cares if two floaters are final 2, the moves have been meh this season and winning comps isn't that important for the win, social is important more than comp wins and if one of them had a better social game than the other then they deserved that win.

It's true that it's not all about the comps, but Paras, Will, and Maddy are all basically three Victoria's from BBUSA16.

[kay kay]

Paras played a good game until her man Jesse went home then it was downhill from there also i actually like Maddy i wish she got some kind of message from home

[Pro Sniper]

Yeah, don't believe a word of it girl. Your 2 special "friends" have always cared about you. The proof is HERE






You know,in such a joke season we've actually been hard done by in not seeing these 2 idiots make the f2. Their pitches for what they've done and why they deserve to win would've been comedy gold. Although, given the way Paras has stomped all over weak Maddy and turned her into an obedient little puppy, there's every chance that after Paras made her pitch for winning, Maddy would make her pitch for Paras as well. Maddy - don't worry about me, I've been hopeless all game. Paras is the only deserving winner here. She's drilled it into me and convinced me that she's protected me since day dot.. If it wasn't for her I'd have gone in Rozina's place. And for that she deserves 4x more than me. In fact, I'll probably hand her over my 20k as well, she deserves the full 120k and a whole lot more. I'm just sorry I disgraced myself and my family by having the audacity to try and better a couple of people that deep down I know don't give a sh!t about me. All I can do now is return home penniless and hope that the good lord - and more importantly - Paras.. can forgive my disgusting treachery. Paras - Oh Maddy(in that litttle patronising voice of hers) you're trying to set me up for a fall again, aren't you? trying to beat me by gaining sympathy votes? Maddy - No, honest, this is just how much you've broken me down and how ridiculous you've now made me..



Embarrassing. As if people would win power and then target people that would do anything but benefit their own game, opting instead to make moves for powerless, floating bits of dead wood.



.. As they were talking like that the controller should have immediately switched on the tannoy and played THIS.. and given them appropriate attire to wear to fit their discussion..like big ball noses and giant red wigs. They really are pathetic enough to believe they've been serious players Someone needs to print off that 3 stooges picture and give them each a giant portrait of it. THAT'S how they'll forever be talked about and be remembered.

And as predicted earlier, almost like reading a cheap foreseeable script, the "winner" of the crucial HOH is.. pathetic Paras. It was obvious they were becoming worried that her "Resume" consisted only of mythical moves dreamed up in her own delusional head..so it was only a matter of time before they helped her out and allowed her to finally get something on her blank canvas. A nice simple stand and answer questions one, made even easier when they give you the answers prior. What's her ratio now? 1/368? but don't forget she's "not been trying" in 364 of them..so she's really 1/4. During the latest ep in another 1 of her pathetic camera talks they even showed her conveniently predicting her win in the HOH and how she's happily going to put the only 2 deserved winners on the block. Similar feel to when they got their other pet to beg Canada for some sort of interference to help him out when he was all set to miss jury.. and then as if by magic..

It's all becoming very clear what their end game is. What's the odds that 1 of the stooges win the Veto? Normal odds would make it 50/50. Unfortuanely we're left with riggage - which makes it 100% certain.