[arista]

This List is Stupid
BBC Confirmed it is a Man
not a BBC Woman Worker

So Mishal
should not be on this list


Also Dan Walker
works for Ch5HDnews
now
Not the BBC.

[bots]

thats a joke graphic arista with Norton on 100%

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

thats a joke graphic arista with Norton on 100%

But, some presenters are getting Angry

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

We have no other choice as the BBC are protecting the perv I said time and time again its unfair on the innocent maile pressenters who have to go public to say it is not them... you like hard facts, I have suggested a few people it might be ...whats the big deal about that exactly

We have a right to know who this person is I dont know why the BBC are protecting them and you have victim blamed saying the family should have gone to the police first that is not your call to make

You can’t see your own hypocrisy

You are going on about the innocent people at the bbc but at the same time happy to throw innocent names about.

Try going into a police station and demanding to see the names of those who have been accused of a crime, you will get told to do one.

[arista]

Lucy Frazer KC MP
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,
is in contact with BBC CEO Tim Davie.

Legal Expert on SkyNewsHD
said one of the problems
is the suspended worker
may have lawyers telling him not to speak
to the BBC.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by arista

Lucy Frazer KC MP
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,
is in contact with BBC CEO Tim Davie.

Legal Expert on SkyNewsHD
said one of the problems
is the suspended worker
may have lawyers telling him not to speak
to the BBC.

The bbc are only his employer they not the police

[arista]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

The bbc are only his employer they not the police

Yes, many hope the Police soon Arrest him
then his name is Front Page


Dirty Bugger BBC Worker

[arista]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

You can’t see your own hypocrisy

You are going on about the innocent people at the bbc but at the same time happy to throw innocent names about.

Try going into a police station and demanding to see the names of those who have been accused of a crime, you will get told to do one.

Lol …I’m suggesting names on TiBB in a jokey way you are moaning about the family and how they handled the situation …look in the mirror

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lol …I’m suggesting names on TiBB in a jokey way you are moaning about the family and how they handled the situation …look in the mirror

No I won’t

If the family went to the police first you wouldn’t be joking about possible innocent people it could be.

Even those accused of a crime have rights.

Some how you think having a tv license gives you rights above and beyond the laws of this country.

[arista]

[arista]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

No I won’t

If the family went to the police first you wouldn’t be joking about possible innocent people it could be.

Even those accused of a crime have rights.

Some how you think having a tv license gives you rights above and beyond the laws of this country.

We do not know what the Mother knows.
The BBC are slow in process
And the Police can now Arrest
that BBC Dirty Bugger.

[bots]

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation

Yes the BBC claim the first contact
2 months back was brief?

[Cherie]

There was another payment made AFTER the mother went to the BBC, she went to the BBC to ask them to stop the payments being made, in my view that was the right way to go as the payments are funding the drug habit, so she wanted to cut off the source ....how anyone can argue with that is mind boggling

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation

I think you are forgetting the recent events with Philip scholfield

ITV asked the questions and the presenter told them the accusations/rumours were not true, the same could be said about this situation

Look what happened to cliff Richard

People made false accusations, his home was raided live on tv

He was cleared and was he not awarded a massive some of money?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

I think you are forgetting the recent events with Philip scholfield

ITV asked the questions and the presenter told them the accusations/rumours were not true, the same could be said about this situation

Look what happened to cliff Richar

People made false accusations, his home was raided live on tv

He was cleared and was he not awarded a massive some of money?

The complaint was made on the 19th May...how long do the BBC need... they victim blamed the mother saying she didn't give them enough information, its only after it came out in the press they have swung into action....shameful

[Cherie]

Did Kay Burley just confirm it was a boy there, she mentioned 'son' then backtracked.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The complaint was made on the 19th May...how long do the BBC need... they victim blamed the mother saying she didn't give them enough information, its only after it came out in the press they have swung into action....shameful

See reference to above post to bitontheside
Bbc ending up paying out 2 million to cliff Richard for getting it wrong

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

See reference to above post to bitontheside
Bbc ending up paying out 2 million to cliff Richard for getting it wrong

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

[arista]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-scandal.html

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

[Liam-]

I hope the people being accused do end up suing those spreading lies about them

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

the evidence will all be dated (phone logs) so that wont be a problem

[bots]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

it doesnt need to be a criminal case. Simply put, if the guy has tarnished the reputation of the bbc that is grounds for dismissal, end of. That's why this whole investigation drama is a joke. If they even have a sniff of impropriety, they can get shot of him