[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

See reference to above post to bitontheside
Bbc ending up paying out 2 million to cliff Richard for getting it wrong

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

the evidence will all be dated (phone logs) so that wont be a problem

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

the evidence will all be dated (phone logs) so that wont be a problem

You don’t know that because it’s not the alleged victim making the claim it’s his mother

Who knows if the alleged victim will cooperate

Questions about Phil meeting the guy while under aged we’re asked the victim in that case gave no evidence to say any wrongdoing had gone on so no charge for mr Phil

[Crimson Dynamo]

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news...ries-list-full

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news...ries-list-full

Phil was on a lot more

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news...ries-list-full

They might as well just have said the name .

"I've heard that this presenter earned more than £411,288 last year!"

[rusticgal]

TIBB Force crack another case...

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

They might as well just have said the name .

"I've heard that this presenter earned more than £411,288 last year!"

That was the point surely to out him without naming him

[bots]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

it doesnt need to be a criminal case. Simply put, if the guy has tarnished the reputation of the bbc that is grounds for dismissal, end of. That's why this whole investigation drama is a joke. If they even have a sniff of impropriety, they can get shot of him

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

it doesnt need to be a criminal case. Simply put, if the guy has tarnished the reputation of the bbc that is grounds for dismissal, end of. That's why this whole investigation drama is a joke. If they even have a sniff of impropriety, they can get shot of him

I’m not disagreeing with that but if there is no criminal case he will be given a lump sum to go quietly