[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I love that comment.

But ironically he would've got a warning for that under Sampvt's rules that they'd apply to BB.

He wasn't a Rachel fan

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

He wasn't a Rachel fan

I don't get how anyone was tbh.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I don't get how anyone was tbh.

She put me to sleep But I did like Kat. She was great.

[JTM45]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Are they going to listen when someone gets glassed

Yep.....................i'm sure the injuries from being 'glassed' with a plastic 'glass' could be life threatning!

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

She put me to sleep But I did like Kat. She was great.

Rachel was so boring.

I know there's this weird myth going around that she was more fun on Live Feed, but I watched Live Feed that year she was basically Shell from BB5.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Winding people up is a valid strategy on BB.

We wouldn't have had BB6 or Rex Newmark at all if you took that strategy away from BB.

you're acting like not having Rex would be a bad thing

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

you're acting like not having Rex would be a bad thing

You'd want him ejected for winding people up though?

And personally Rex was the only one that did anything interesting in B-Block so I'd take him over the others in that group in that series.

[JTM45]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

you're acting like not having Rex would be a bad thing

I'd have trouble remembering BB9 without Rex.............and Sara!

[Macie Lightfoot]

I want him ejected from my memory, yes.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

I want him ejected from my memory, yes.

We all have Housemates like that so I do pity you.

[Daniel.]

Originally Posted by sampvt

So calling an obviously annoyed straight man my darling boy is not serious intimidation and starting arguments with no foundation hoping for a reaction is ok is it. I agree that arguments will happen but deliberate baiting is out of order.

I call my straight best friend darling and he calls me it back, maybe because he's comfortable with his sexuality unlike Joe

[Northern Monkey]

I'm one for as few warnings as possible but if they are going to hand them out then be consistent is all i ask.

[Tom4784]

So out of all the aggressive people in that house you only take issue with a gay man and a black woman?

[RhysJones]

You call Sue aggressive tonight when it was literally her vs Tom, Sam and Ellie

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

So out of all the aggressive people in that house you only take issue with a gay man and a black woman?

Someone said it!!

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by RhysJones

You call Sue aggressive tonight when it was literally her vs Tom, Sam and Ellie

Tbf Ellie didn't do much wrong tonight.

[pontyboi]

Originally Posted by sampvt

So calling an obviously annoyed straight man my darling boy is not serious intimidation and starting arguments with no foundation hoping for a reaction is ok is it. I agree that arguments will happen but deliberate baiting is out of order.

Look arguments don't happen for no reason....Andrew is an eccentric character and that's the way he talks to anyone.

Joe in your opinion took it as some sort of gay thing but why should that be an issue? Why would Joe feel less of a man?

It was purely the fact Andrew is a newbie and has the chance to steal money from the prize fund.

I think both me and you agree Joe is a scrotum?

[pontyboi]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

So out of all the aggressive people in that house you only take issue with a gay man and a black woman?

You're doing the same thing though lol lets stop calling out skin colour or what willy goes in a bum and judge on personality.

Am I the only sane person here?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by pontyboi

You're doing the same thing though lol lets stop calling out skin colour or what willy goes in a bum and judge on personality.

Am I the only sane person here?

How is it in any way, shape or form the same? Explain because I don't see the logic in that comparison.

It's an aggressive house, if you're gonna call certain housemates aggressive but then never mention anything about the likes of Tom or Chanelle then it's going to look suspect. Pointing that out isn't a case of me doing the same thing as Sam, that makes no sense. I just think it's hypocritical to mention aggression and then home in on certain housemates while ignoring more aggressive HMs just because they happen to be white and straight.

The desire to ignore racism and homophobia when it's staring you in the face is almost as disturbing as the racism and homophobia itself.

[pontyboi]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

How is it in any way, shape or form the same? Explain because I don't see the logic in that comparison.

It's an aggressive house, if you're gonna call certain housemates aggressive but then never mention anything about the likes of Tom or Chanelle then it's going to look suspect. Pointing that out isn't a case of me doing the same thing as Sam, that makes no sense. I just think it's hypocritical to mention aggression and then home in on certain housemates while ignoring more aggressive HMs just because they happen to be white and straight.

The desire to ignore racism and homophobia when it's staring you in the face is almost as disturbing as the racism and homophobia itself.

I don't see the house more aggressive than BB3 back in 2002....I do however find the viewers getting constantly offended and shockingly the ratings have dropped....actually not shocking at all.

Why does Big Brother get so much more complaints when other shows with actual punch ups and full on sex is overlooked?

It's the BB fans they are so self destructive and killing the show.....my god ive said this atleast times now.

[pontyboi]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

How is it in any way, shape or form the same? Explain because I don't see the logic in that comparison.

It's an aggressive house, if you're gonna call certain housemates aggressive but then never mention anything about the likes of Tom or Chanelle then it's going to look suspect. Pointing that out isn't a case of me doing the same thing as Sam, that makes no sense. I just think it's hypocritical to mention aggression and then home in on certain housemates while ignoring more aggressive HMs just because they happen to be white and straight.

The desire to ignore racism and homophobia when it's staring you in the face is almost as disturbing as the racism and homophobia itself.

Because attributing a certain personality to someone who has a different skin colour or likes having sex with someone of the same gender is dumb.

And they do mention the likes of dicks like Tom....im Welsh and I think he's a knob.


There's you're proof I don't stick up for certain racies.

[Paula D]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I would say goading and intimidating amounts to the same thing...you are saying things in an attempt to get a reaction.

I think you need to look up a definition of intimidating.

[Paula D]

Originally Posted by pontyboi

Because attributing a certain personality to someone who has a different skin colour or likes having sex with someone of the same gender is dumb.

And they do mention the likes of dicks like Tom....im Welsh and I think he's a knob.


There's you're proof I don't stick up for certain racies.

I think you've missed the point ponty, Dezzy is not talking about you.

[sampvt]

I wasnt going to come back and explain myself but it now seems necessary.....You are all missing the point. I meant, or tried to convey, that extreme aggression or bad intimidation can make people to do things they cant help. God luv, 90 % of the worlds murders are commited over arguments using words.

If a man goes up against a woman, regardless of their gender or skin and gets right up into her face and personal space shouting, he will be either evicted or warned and severely. HOWEVER women can do the same thing pushing a man to the brink of insanity, and she gets away with it and the guy is supposed to sit down and brush it off.

Putting your point across and arguing is one thing, but when you get PERSONAL, thats different. I was using andrew and sue as examples because they were the last 2 fresh arguments in the house, just so happens they fit Dezzys profile of colour and gender which a lot on here want to label me with but you couldnt be farther from the truth. I supported dowling all the way through as a great HM and he was gay and Ive supported black or Asian contestants over the years.

Im not racist or homophobe, I might come across that way just because there are a lot of different types of people in the house. My issue is with people that go OTT with comments and phrases that are deliberately designed to hurt. Calling Joe and aggressive wanker of despicable miserable old man would be regarded as bad but acceptable, but calling him darling boy is OTT. Sue said yesterday that Sams relationship in the house was nothing to do with anyone and she encouraged it, then she comes out with this ****.

If Joe had have called Andrew a raving nancy boy or even darling boy, he wouldnt be here. I just cant seem to get my point across to some people as they will never listen to anyone they cant or wont like. My whole point is that BB needs to treat all hm,s the same, male or female, gender or colour, size or stature. This year they are loosing the plot and deliberately encouraging mayhem and its so plain to see. They are getting more blood thirsty because they think it brings the ratings but sadly it just disgusts most viewers. By the way, what is unacceptable language.....Using the C word obviously isnt, speaking about felation and spitting ejaculate out the window isnt, calling someone a darling boy isnt, so where do they draw the line. Certainly nowhere near the bounds of orality that other shows use.

[Niamh.]

How anyone could consider "darling boy" as serious intimidation is beyond me.