[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

who builds houses? who designs them?

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:

I wouldnt dispute that.

[Sam1994]

So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

[John.]

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star. [/quote]

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes??

[xDramatick]

Ridiculous.

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now.

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994
So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

no what i'm saying is they've
1. built the house,
2. decorated it
3. taken pictures
4. redecorated it

all in order too fool us. who knows what big brohter is up to.

plus they would spent thousands if they wanted this series to be successful!!

[Cody™]

Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

[Jase]

Iv had thought about fake pics being taken but they wouldnt go tru all the trouble

[Sam1994]

Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.

Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most.

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.

who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994
Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.

Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most.

nut you need to give the housemates a good place to interact in. and if C4 want to make BB9 a success they will spend the money.!!

!!this thread is about the possibility of fakes house pictures, not the interactions of housemates.!!

[Sam1994]

Originally posted by jad22247

who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother

So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

who builds houses? who designs them?

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

[/quote]

Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed.

[Tom]

The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.

[Sam1994]

Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.

Yes, I would agree with that.

But I doubt they would re-decorate the whole place

[Jase]

Originally posted by jad22247

who builds houses? who designs them?

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

[/quote]

I think they would do this only as a teaser the the papers a few months before the show starts

[Cody™]

Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.

Yea. They should have more furniture. Im expecting a larger sofa for the lounge area.

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994

So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994

So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994

So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

[Sam1994]

I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!

I feel more comfortable in the dark

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they may not be true, thus meaning they could be FAKE!!!

[/quote]

Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed. [/quote]

i can't hold my breath for 9 days!!

[John.]

Originally posted by Sam1994
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!

I feel more comfortable in the dark

the only colour would be the sky.
the grass would be grey.
everything black and white for 3months, i dont think so