[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

A bit of evidence would be good in those tweets.

Rudi Gulianni claims he has all the evidence on hard drive. Every single media channel in the World should be asking him to prove it. But they don't. Let's get Gulianni in a court of law under oath and tell him to produce the evidence.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by arista

If she is underage
Arrest him.

Yes, that's what you'd expect to happen. But we're dealing with people who don't believe the rules and laws count for them. And we've put them people in positions of power where they can make that a reality. And we'll continue to put them there because we allow them to get away with it.

Hopefully there's some good people out there that are trying to put a stop to it. That's all we can hope for.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

This lady claims she's seen it

Youtube video

I watched the vid up until the 3 minute mark, so if I've missed anything explosive, then let me know.

A couple of things that stood out. Firstly she said they asked the police if anything had been reported, but American law is a lot stricter, so if these images were really as the innuendo is saying, then not actually reporting it once you've seen them, has a pretty strong chance of making you an accessory after the fact. See the way she curbed her language? Instead of making any accusations she plays in the grey area of just asking questions?

He dated his dead brothers wife, so I completely understand why a psychologist may have suggested him being in his nieces life through a relationship with her ma, at the time she was dealing with her own grief, may not be a healthy situation for a young teenage girl to be experiencing. Although I'm neither a professional or in possession of all the facts.

Again, she's seen the laptop and doesn't have one genuine accusation to make. If she says something explosive after 3 minutes in let me know and I'll have a further watch.

[arista]

"anything explosive,"


Under the legal age

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I watched the vid up until the 3 minute mark, so if I've missed anything explosive, then let me know.

A couple of things that stood out. Firstly she said they asked the police if anything had been reported, but American law is a lot stricter, so if these images were really as the innuendo is saying, then not actually reporting it once you've seen them, has a pretty strong chance of making you an accessory after the fact. See the way she curbed her language? Instead of making any accusations she plays in the grey area of just asking questions?

He dated his dead brothers wife, so I completely understand why a psychologist may have suggested him being in his nieces life through a relationship with her ma, at the time she was dealing with her own grief, may not be a healthy situation for a young teenage girl to be experiencing. Although I'm neither a professional or in possession of all the facts.

Again, she's seen the laptop and doesn't have one genuine accusation to make. If she says something explosive after 3 minutes in let me know and I'll have a further watch.

She goes on to mention Human Trafficking.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

"anything explosive,"


Under the legal age

Having a picture taken with an underage family member, doesn't automatically mean you are a predator. I daresay there are prob some pics of me lying down with an even younger family member.

She's seen all the pics and never says he's touching her, she's naked, he's got her posing in a suggestive manner - just that she's horizontal.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

She goes on to mention Human Trafficking.

In what context? You've just mentioned human trafficking, but I don't automatically think you have 37 eastern Europeans in a warehouse in Hull.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

In what context? You've just mentioned human trafficking, but I don't automatically think you have 37 eastern Europeans in a warehouse in Hull.

I didn't mention Human trafficking. I said that the lady in the video who claims to have seen the contents of the laptop mentioned it.

I've told you, I don't have your answers, I'm just sharing with you what's out there in the public square.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

I didn't mention Human trafficking. I said that the lady in the video who claims to have seen the contents of the laptop mentioned it.

I've told you, I don't have your answers, I'm just sharing with you what's out there in the public square.

Appreciate your efforts, Alf. Do you even see where I'm coming from about the innuendos and whispers versus actual facts or accusations?

It may turn out that there is a scandal here (who knows?), but it won't be based on any information in this thread or that Giuliani is peddling.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Having a picture taken with an underage family member, doesn't automatically mean you are a predator. I daresay there are prob some pics of me lying down with an even younger family member.

She's seen all the pics and never says he's touching her, she's naked, he's got her posing in a suggestive manner - just that she's horizontal.

You're absolutely right in your first point, I don't think anyone disagree's with that. You're basically stating the obvious. Suspicion isn't a crime.

But there's a strong sense that there is more to this that what we're being led to believe.

So who is investigating these suspicions? What are they saying? What evidence do they have? Let's see and hear it. That sounds a sensible thing to do.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

You're absolutely right in your first point, I don't think anyone disagree's with that. You're basically stating the obvious. Suspicion isn't a crime.

But there's a strong sense that there is more to this that what we're being led to believe.

So who is investigating these suspicions? What are they saying? What evidence do they have? Let's see and hear it. That sounds a sensible thing to do.

Do you see any contradiction in the bits I've just bolded?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Do you see any contradiction in the bits I've just bolded?

No.

Suspicion isn't a crime. That's a fact. However being suspicious of something isn't a crime either and you are perfectly entitled to investigate those suspicions.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

No.

Suspicion isn't a crime. That's a fact. However being suspicious of something isn't a crime either and you are perfectly entitled to investigate those suspicions.

As BOTS pointed out, there are huge issues with the access that anyone could have had to this laptop making it almost impossible. The FBI have investigated already.

A co-ordinated attempt to make something appear suspicious, doesn't necessarily take it to the stage where it should be investigated again.

[Alf]

The Don

He told you everything

[Alf]

Here's Biden saying the laptop is Russian disinformation. Now that we know the laptop exists then what else has he excused on being Russian disinformation? Do you trust him with your safety?

The scary question is. Does Putin have the information of what is on the laptop? If so, how could he use it to his strength?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

As BOTS pointed out, there are huge issues with the access that anyone could have had to this laptop making it almost impossible. The FBI have investigated already.

A co-ordinated attempt to make something appear suspicious, doesn't necessarily take it to the stage where it should be investigated again.

Eventually. Slowly but surely

[The Slim Reaper]

You should rename the thread to "Alfs top 20 biden tweets that don't offer a genuine accusation or a shred of evidence countdown"

It's all theatre so when they take back congress later this year, they can spam the false investigations. Same playbook they used on Hilary.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You should rename the thread to "Alfs top 20 biden tweets that don't offer a genuine accusation or a shred of evidence countdown"

It's all theatre so when they take back congress later this year, they can spam the false investigations. Same playbook they used on Hilary.

And you should comment in Alf's Top 50 1980s film countdown and let me know where I've made mistakes.

[bots]

it's funny when Alf disappears down his own conspiracy rabbit hole. In one thread he will be saying ... don't believe that, not enough evidence ... and then you get this

[Alf]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

it's funny when Alf disappears down his own conspiracy rabbit hole. In one thread he will be saying ... don't believe that, not enough evidence ... and then you get this

It's not that funny.

[Alf]

This lady has written a book on Hunter Biden's laptop, so I assume she's seen the contents. Here are her opinions on the latest events and what needs to happen now. On the Tucker Carlson show last night.

Youtube video

[The Slim Reaper]

Another person, who even after writing a book about the scandal, refusing to say what the scandal actually is.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Another person, who even after writing a book about the scandal, refusing to say what the scandal actually is.

Correct. Well observed.

Is there a point with that observation?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

Correct. Well observed.

Is there a point with that observation?

I believe I've made my point already. All of these experts. including people who've seen the actual contents of the laptop, can't/won't even point to one crime that should be investigated. That fact should make folks think they've been had, but unfortunately within conspiracy circles, it is actually more likely to convince them that they are privy to something the rest of us aren't.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I believe I've made my point already. All of these experts. including people who've seen the actual contents of the laptop, can't/won't even point to one crime that should be investigated. That fact should make folks think they've been had, but unfortunately within conspiracy circles, it is actually more likely to convince them that they are privy to something the rest of us aren't.

Nah, do you know what makes people suspicious about all this? it's the lying about it saying it doesn't exist and is just Russian disinformation and the failure to report on it when for 3 years solid, day and night they bombarded the news cycle with a fake Russia hoax against Trump.

2 + 2 isn't making 4 right now.